a friend bet a 3 team parlay last night. LAD/NYM/NYY & balt Under 9.... WHAT DOES HE GET PAID ON ????
Last edited:
parlay ruling
- Thread starter bryanz
- Start date
I would think he would get nothing. If he picked the under in the Bal/NY game it has 14 runs and still needs to complete 1 and a half innings.
The Yankees game is an official loss for ML and parlays. The total (or a RL play) is a no play.
J
J
Last edited:
the way you wrote it looks like a 3-team parlay and a straight bet on the under...
NYY Under/NYM/LAD parlay becomes a straight wager winner on the Dodgers...
NYY Under/NYM/LAD parlay becomes a straight wager winner on the Dodgers...
The parlay is reduced to the games where action is complete(d). In this case, just the dodgers bet.
I had the Yankees in that game. So far it looks like the official ruling is that it's no game. I thought they had changed the rules this year to where they finished the game the next time they met. I know they did it in a Fla game but can't find anything but the it's a no-game at this point. The league has no winner and no loser. Regardless, it would have to go the full game for the total either way.
I had the Orioles in a parlay w/ Cards last night and was happy to see game suspended as I got my $$ back on what was probably going to be a loser. Then this morning I had more $$ in my account than expected and I discovered that my off-shore book has a rule that if game gets suspended after 6 the score reverts back to the last full inning played and they pay on that basis. Thus, Orioles bet wins. Finally, I catch a break. Obviously, run-line and total bets are cancelled since game didn't go 8.5. Other off-shore books may have this rule as well.
As Wahoo posted above, even though the league has it as "no game" this year the books still have the old "revert back to last full inning" making the NYY side a loser and, as always, the total a no-play.
The par therefore pays as just a stright LAD play.
J
The par therefore pays as just a stright LAD play.
J
I really don't understand why this rule is so hard to understand...
"for betting purposes"...not for mlb rules...the last completed inning counts...betting rules state the game has to finish on the date it was scheduled...therefore, the last completed inning had the Orioles winning. We've all been on the wrong side of these kind of games. That's just the way it goes.
moneyline winner=orioles
run line either side=no action
total=no action
"for betting purposes"...not for mlb rules...the last completed inning counts...betting rules state the game has to finish on the date it was scheduled...therefore, the last completed inning had the Orioles winning. We've all been on the wrong side of these kind of games. That's just the way it goes.
moneyline winner=orioles
run line either side=no action
total=no action
Last edited:
