Apache gunship takes out insurgents
- Thread starter cisco
- Start date
HELL YEAH!!!!!!
Those iraqi's just exploded. How would you like to be the last dude, KNOWING your ass is toast!!! :scared
Those iraqi's just exploded. How would you like to be the last dude, KNOWING your ass is toast!!! :scared
so THAT's where video games come from. crazy cool!
I hate being suspicious that everything online is fake though.
I hate being suspicious that everything online is fake though.
HOt damn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HOt damn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
outfreaking standing !!!! woo hoo
smoking da sand dwellers :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:
HOt damn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
outfreaking standing !!!! woo hoo
smoking da sand dwellers :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:
I am not sure how far away they are but it seems to me that these thugs could hear and maybe even see the chopper and thats why they tried to ditch the rpg.
The only thing that bothers me is what happens at the end. When they see that guy that is clearly injured there is not a command to finish him off with a bullet and this is what puzzles me. The order is to shoot "forward of the truck". It seems that this is to finish killing the wounded dude but be able to cover their ass by saying that the final shot was just to blow up the enemy vehicle. That seems like PC bullshit to me. By that I mean that it is my understanding that we don't kill wounded enemies, we take them prisoner but I guess if you are just disabling a truck and someone gets killed they were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Now I am not a warhawk but what is the ****ing difference. This guy obviously wanted to harm US forces with that RPG why bother blowing up the truck. Just "smoke" that dude.
Maybe it is just that I don't understand the command or something and it is preferrable to blow up a truck to make sure the insurgent is roasted. Who knows. Anyway, crazy stuff.
The only thing that bothers me is what happens at the end. When they see that guy that is clearly injured there is not a command to finish him off with a bullet and this is what puzzles me. The order is to shoot "forward of the truck". It seems that this is to finish killing the wounded dude but be able to cover their ass by saying that the final shot was just to blow up the enemy vehicle. That seems like PC bullshit to me. By that I mean that it is my understanding that we don't kill wounded enemies, we take them prisoner but I guess if you are just disabling a truck and someone gets killed they were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Now I am not a warhawk but what is the ****ing difference. This guy obviously wanted to harm US forces with that RPG why bother blowing up the truck. Just "smoke" that dude.
Maybe it is just that I don't understand the command or something and it is preferrable to blow up a truck to make sure the insurgent is roasted. Who knows. Anyway, crazy stuff.
I'm guessing they had a .50 cal in the whirly bird they were shooting with.
If that is the case, you can't shoot at unarmed people, only equipment/gear. the size of the round determines what you can and cant shoot at.
rules of war and crap like that.
that being said... its an easy work around to just pop someone off with a 50 cal. "sorry sir, I was aiming at his canteen, that's gear ya know sir"
If that is the case, you can't shoot at unarmed people, only equipment/gear. the size of the round determines what you can and cant shoot at.
rules of war and crap like that.
that being said... its an easy work around to just pop someone off with a 50 cal. "sorry sir, I was aiming at his canteen, that's gear ya know sir"
YYZ, I agree, that video is old. Saw this about a year ago. I myself in my opinion, believe this is not a genuine video. I saw a video a year ago that has some of the same footage that this one does.
Had to go seven pages deep to bump this back to the top.On this Memorial Day Weekend,for those that have died for our country and the freedom that we have today I have four words for you THANK YOU and SMOKE-EM!
Awsome footage!
Awsome footage!
That video here has been edit-ed(sp?)
Correct me if Im wrong, but I think its almost 2 yrs old :shrug:
Franky
Oh, I forgot to add, I watched "Private Ryan" last night again(for the umptienth time) with a 25 yr old who told me he would be the first one to Canada it they institute the Draft again :SIB Needless to say, after 20 minutes, on TNT no less, he had to leave :sadwave:
WTF :shrug:
Correct me if Im wrong, but I think its almost 2 yrs old :shrug:
Franky
Oh, I forgot to add, I watched "Private Ryan" last night again(for the umptienth time) with a 25 yr old who told me he would be the first one to Canada it they institute the Draft again :SIB Needless to say, after 20 minutes, on TNT no less, he had to leave :sadwave:
WTF :shrug:
Last edited:
