George Bush !

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
how far we have fallen in the politics forum that we have to resort to name calling


yu neocon worthless sadsack pussychop rat bastids
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
You stupid piece of yesterdays garbage. So you attack who is in. What are you as simple as you think we are. Why don't attack the Republicans in congress who put a stop to everything. You want to go back to the policies that got us into this mess because you attack whoever is in power. You are truly a simpleton. Truly. At least Skulnuts doesn't try to defend his defenseless position. Unlike you, you stupid hunk of crap.

So say's the guy who can't write and or type in complete and coherent sentences.

So say's the guy who needs constant government assistance.

So say's the very same guy, who again blame it on the Repugnican Congress, yet the CHOSEN ONE had both houses for 2 years and couldn't get his way on every Socialist Program !

I certainly don't see you complaining about the NDAA. Why is that? Because the Mickey Mouse, sorry Mickey, news organizations that carry O's water don't even talk about the NDAA, why is that? I will answer it for you snapper head. Because the NDAA cannot be defended.

INDEFINITE MILITARY DETENTION !
NO TRIAL, NO LAWYER ! NO RIGHTS !

DEFEND THAT ! CHOWD !

Yeah, I know the Repugnicans voted yes on this POS ! It's your Boize Act !
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
So say's the guy who can't write and or type in complete and coherent sentences.

So say's the guy who needs constant government assistance.

So say's the very same guy, who again blame it on the Repugnican Congress, yet the CHOSEN ONE had both houses for 2 years and couldn't get his way on every Socialist Program !

I certainly don't see you complaining about the NDAA. Why is that? Because the Mickey Mouse, sorry Mickey, news organizations that carry O's water don't even talk about the NDAA, why is that? I will answer it for you snapper head. Because the NDAA cannot be defended.

INDEFINITE MILITARY DETENTION !
NO TRIAL, NO LAWYER ! NO RIGHTS !

DEFEND THAT ! CHOWD !

Yeah, I know the Repugnicans voted yes on this POS ! It's your Boize Act !

I am sorry that I have ADD and it causes my spelling and typing to be terrible. Maybe you can have me shot. I most certainly did attack Obama during his first two years. You see shithead, that is difference between me and you. I attack, whoever is wrong, not just whoever I am told to hate. Carry on simpleton.
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
I am sorry that I have ADD and it causes my spelling and typing to be terrible. Maybe you can have me shot. I most certainly did attack Obama during his first two years. You see shithead, that is difference between me and you. I attack, whoever is wrong, not just whoever I am told to hate. Carry on simpleton.

hey shitferbrains !

Maybe if you do some searching,
you might accidentally stumble upon
my posts where I attack GWB.

I have continuously called him GEE WIZ,
posted my opposition to the Patriot Act,
which, your homey was against, but now for ! :shrug:

I have posted threads about the book, Family of Secrets, by Russ Baker.

Who said, not I, that those with ADD should be "Aired Out"?
ADD is no excuse for not using speel chek
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
hey shitferbrains !

Maybe if you do some searching,
you might accidentally stumble upon
my posts where I attack GWB.

I have continuously called him GEE WIZ,
posted my opposition to the Patriot Act,
which, your homey was against, but now for ! :shrug:

I have posted threads about the book, Family of Secrets, by Russ Baker.

Who said, not I, that those with ADD should be "Aired Out"?
ADD is no excuse for not using speel chek

True I could use spell check. But I don't find it too important.
I have been all over Obama for a variety of reasons. So why do you get off saying I blindly defend him. The problem, and it is a big problem, is do we want to go back to the policies of Bush, that Romney and Ryan support? The problem is that those are the policies that got us into the mess.
Has Obama been as advertised, off course not. In my opinion the guy has been a failure. For various reasons. But he is better than going back to Bush. Romney is not bringing anything new to the table as far as I can see.
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
True I could use spell check. But I don't find it too important.
I have been all over Obama for a variety of reasons. So why do you get off saying I blindly defend him. The problem, and it is a big problem, is do we want to go back to the policies of Bush, that Romney and Ryan support? The problem is that those are the policies that got us into the mess.
Has Obama been as advertised, off course not. In my opinion the guy has been a failure. For various reasons. But he is better than going back to Bush. Romney is not bringing anything new to the table as far as I can see.

so what is new and fresh about Pimp Daddy "O" ?

all of his policies are a rewind to Marx, Stalin, Alinsky, Sanger, Darwin.

hmm maybe you should see how Sanger and Darwin feel about da black folk, an shit

So,

I axt you to look those shit heads up
 

ssd

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 2, 2000
1,837
53
48
Ohio
WOW.

Almost 4 years removed and Dubya still pulling in 4 pages of hate.

FEEL THE LOVE, BITCHEZZZZ!

:mj07:
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
I am sorry that I have ADD and it causes my spelling and typing to be terrible. Maybe you can have me shot. I most certainly did attack Obama during his first two years. You see shithead, that is difference between me and you. I attack, whoever is wrong, not just whoever I am told to hate. Carry on simpleton.

Maybe you can have me shot

You have mistaken me for the Clinton's and you being Vince Foster
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top