Haven't seen the numbers... Is Oakland an obvious trap?

[thadchr]

I haven't seen a reliable side breakdown on who's betting once, but I know this opened at -6, and my guess even at that number was that Oakland would get the majority of bets. Now I see it all the way down to 4... is this a classic Vegas-likes-their-own-side (KC) game? opcorn2

 

[IX_Bender]

yes, but its still a 60/40 bet at best.


many times seen this one come in right above the late public number but ahead of the initial move.

a.k.a. BW

where Oakland wins by exactly 4 or 5. This sharp/square discussion usually falls to the ground with most of the knuckleheads here, but choose to respond to you based on the fact that you 'get it'

GL

 

[Smitty]

just an fyi, the game didn't open at 6. it opened around 3.5 or 4, but got driven up to 6 when it was announced that palmer was starting. now that it appears like he's not starting, the line fell back to where it opened.

 

[thadchr]

Thanks man. Out of curiosity, who do you like?

 

[vinnie]

just an fyi, the game didn't open at 6. it opened around 3.5 or 4, but got driven up to 6 when it was announced that palmer was starting. now that it appears like he's not starting, the line fell back to where it opened.

yep that's what I thought too :shrug:

 

[ageecee]

KC or no play for me


Boller is fukin terrible

 

[thadchr]

Ah good call Smitty. Like I said, hadn't really seen the numbers as I've had less time than usual to cap this week. Regardless, something just feels wrong with this game...