A
azbob
Guest
Some of the mouthbreathers here had to wash out their wet panties when Obamacare was upheld but, now we are starting to understand the impact.
Hospitals have been penalized based on their rate of readmission. This is done under the guise of "quality" but is really a way to stop payments for services and fund Obamacare...just another tax.
Here's an example...a patient is discharged from the hospital after a heart attack. He or she is readmitted to the hospital FOR ANY CONDITION, within 30 days...that is a penalty.
The reality of that situation is that people who have heart attacks tend to have other conditions (diabetes, high blood pressure, obesity) that causes them to use more services. Hospitals don't get paid if they return in that 30-day window.
Still not convinced...poor patients tend not to be compliant with drug regimens, aftercare instructions, seeing their private doctor etc. so they tend to be readmitted more. Hospitals that serve these populations will suffer higher penalities. You can expect those hospitals AND DOCTORS to re-examine their ability to serve these populations. Some hospitals are already closing or, in states where it is legal, not building or closing emergecy departments.
Two out of three hospitals are now paying the penalty. Check out the list and consider that the large majority serve urban areas.
Want more...research hospitals tend to take on sicker patients. Those patients tend to return to the hospital more often because they are sicker. Reduce funding for those facilities and they reduce research. You can throw training hospitals into this category too which will be especially impactful as we are facing a shortage of primary care doctors.
Consider this...you got out of the hospital after a heart attack and you feel some discomfort in your chest. When you go to the ED within 30 days of that discharge, just remember the hospital now has incentives to not readmit you. Some of the hospitals with the lowest mortality rate for heart failure are now paying fines for readmitting those heart patients. You figure that out.
Hospitals have been penalized based on their rate of readmission. This is done under the guise of "quality" but is really a way to stop payments for services and fund Obamacare...just another tax.
Here's an example...a patient is discharged from the hospital after a heart attack. He or she is readmitted to the hospital FOR ANY CONDITION, within 30 days...that is a penalty.
The reality of that situation is that people who have heart attacks tend to have other conditions (diabetes, high blood pressure, obesity) that causes them to use more services. Hospitals don't get paid if they return in that 30-day window.
Still not convinced...poor patients tend not to be compliant with drug regimens, aftercare instructions, seeing their private doctor etc. so they tend to be readmitted more. Hospitals that serve these populations will suffer higher penalities. You can expect those hospitals AND DOCTORS to re-examine their ability to serve these populations. Some hospitals are already closing or, in states where it is legal, not building or closing emergecy departments.
Two out of three hospitals are now paying the penalty. Check out the list and consider that the large majority serve urban areas.
Want more...research hospitals tend to take on sicker patients. Those patients tend to return to the hospital more often because they are sicker. Reduce funding for those facilities and they reduce research. You can throw training hospitals into this category too which will be especially impactful as we are facing a shortage of primary care doctors.
Consider this...you got out of the hospital after a heart attack and you feel some discomfort in your chest. When you go to the ED within 30 days of that discharge, just remember the hospital now has incentives to not readmit you. Some of the hospitals with the lowest mortality rate for heart failure are now paying fines for readmitting those heart patients. You figure that out.
Last edited:

