LORD OBAMA

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,494
304
83
52
Where it is real F ing COLD
PETTY!
Because it's about NOT CIRCUMVENTING THE RULE OF LAW!!!!

Are we just going to PICK & CHOOSE what LAWS are to be ENFORCED... :facepalm: GOD HELP YOU!

1. I don't believe in fairy tales.

2. Presidents have been PICKING & CHOOSING what LAWS are to be ENFORCED for years.

3. If you want to look at city ordinances and laws, you would be amazed at how many laws are ignored.

4. Just because something is law does not mean it is not ignorant. With your thinking Abraham Lincoln was acting like the LORD because he decided that slavery was unconstitutional
 

greggraffin

Progressing
Forum Member
Feb 23, 2005
6,744
129
63
1. I don't believe in fairy tales.

2. Presidents have been PICKING & CHOOSING what LAWS are to be ENFORCED for years.

3. If you want to look at city ordinances and laws, you would be amazed at how many laws are ignored.

4. Just because something is law does not mean it is not ignorant. With your thinking Abraham Lincoln was acting like the LORD because he decided that slavery was unconstitutional
:0074
 

greggraffin

Progressing
Forum Member
Feb 23, 2005
6,744
129
63
if its okay for homosexuals to be married, whats stopping someone from marrying their pet? marriage has to be defined somehow. If lesbians and homosexual men want to live together, I could care less, they should not be able to marry under any circumstances. And since when has Obama become King Obama? That is the bigger question

one man one woman

marriage is between two people that agree to the union

a pet cannot consent to love the way two people can, homosexual or straight

and i really don't understand how two people getting married is anyone else's business and how it affects the proverbial you
 

Cie

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 30, 2003
22,391
253
0
New Orleans
if its okay for homosexuals to be married, whats stopping someone from marrying their pet? marriage has to be defined somehow. If lesbians and homosexual men want to live together, I could care less, they should not be able to marry under any circumstances. And since when has Obama become King Obama? That is the bigger question

one man one woman

Comparing homosexuals to animals now? Ridiculous, even for you.......
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
Comparing homosexuals to animals now? Ridiculous, even for you.......

Are you really surprised? I'm not. It actually makes me think that Hedgy has thought about fucking animals quite a few times in his life if this has actually crossed his mind.
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,494
304
83
52
Where it is real F ing COLD
Are you really surprised? I'm not. It actually makes me think that Hedgy has thought about fucking animals quite a few times in his life if this has actually crossed his mind.

:mj07:

I spit out my coke after reading this.
I know me and Hedgie are worlds apart politically but I still like him.
I don't think he can help it. I think it was his upbringing.
 

greggraffin

Progressing
Forum Member
Feb 23, 2005
6,744
129
63
Are you really surprised? I'm not. It actually makes me think that Hedgy has thought about fucking animals quite a few times in his life if this has actually crossed his mind.

lol, i thought he made that animal comment tongue in cheek, am i wrong?:shrug:
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
He has said before that he only gives to charities that help out animals. It makes complete sense to me now.
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
:shrug:

Fat%20man%20and%20dog.jpg
 
P

PRO190

Guest
right back at you


I don't need to change anything ..The LAW yes the LAW is IN FORCE...

Oh that's right, guess it isn't IN FORCE because the PRESIDENT WHO SWORE AN OATH TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION ISN'T!!!



"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
 

greggraffin

Progressing
Forum Member
Feb 23, 2005
6,744
129
63
I don't need to change anything ..The LAW yes the LAW is IN FORCE...

Oh that's right, guess it isn't IN FORCE because the PRESIDENT WHO SWORE AN OATH TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION ISN'T!!!



"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

aren't laws that are unconstitutional, ie ban on gay marriage and slavery, laws that need to be taken up and by citizens like you and I?

and what of BP's points?
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
I don't need to change anything ..The LAW yes the LAW is IN FORCE...

Oh that's right, guess it isn't IN FORCE because the PRESIDENT WHO SWORE AN OATH TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION ISN'T!!!



"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

hypocrisy.jpg
 
P

PRO190

Guest
1. I don't believe in fairy tales.

2. Presidents have been PICKING & CHOOSING what LAWS are to be ENFORCED for years.

3. If you want to look at city ordinances and laws, you would be amazed at how many laws are ignored.

4. Just because something is law does not mean it is not ignorant. With your thinking Abraham Lincoln was acting like the LORD because he decided that slavery was unconstitutional

1) Why not, You are living one supposedly ....

2) Really, Names,dates and Laws ignored please

3)So it's OK to Ignore Laws

4)Didn't say some Laws were not "Ignorant "
the Fact still remains there is a Legislative system in place.. So in Anything THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS...
So any Law the President sees as Ignorant he should just have unenforceable...

President 190 declares NLRA Unconstitutional..No More CB.. Get to Back to Work!

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++




3)
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,494
304
83
52
Where it is real F ing COLD
1) Why not, You are living one supposedly ....

2) Really, Names,dates and Laws ignored please

3)So it's OK to Ignore Laws

4)Didn't say some Laws were not "Ignorant "
the Fact still remains there is a Legislative system in place.. So in Anything THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS...
So any Law the President sees as Ignorant he should just have unenforceable...

President 190 declares NLRA Unconstitutional..No More CB.. Get to Back to Work!

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++




3)

1. Well I think you are the one living in the fairy tale. Times are a changing and people are evolving.

2. I am not posting any links but you can google Bush and Ignored laws and you will find a bunch.

3. I ignore laws everyday. I speed like hell and I jay walk.

4. Don't think they should for all laws but for human rights maybe.
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
Bush on the Constitution: 'It's just a goddamned piece of paper'

I bet Pro didn't have a problem with that. Stop fighting blindly for a party.
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
1)

2) Really, Names,dates and Laws ignored please

3)

G.W. Bush:

Law ignored: 4th Amendment of the Constitution, to wit:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Violation: Warrantless searches, see the so-called Patriot Act.

Law ignored: Violation of the Nuremberg Principles defining "War Crimes"
Principle Vl of the Nuremberg Principles states:

The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under; international law:
a. Crimes against peace:
i. Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression

There are many, many more, but since the two above, which are clear and indefensible, have penalties of life imprisonment and execution, they will do.

You're welcome.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top