Nutter: NRA's Ad Attacking Obama's Children, Must Be Removed Immediately
- Thread starter MadJack
- Start date
:mj07: :mj07:
You had problems with Obama using kids the other day.
And yet have no problem when the NRA uses the president kids to further their agenda.
:shrug:
A little consistency be nice from you in the future skull.
Shawn, is this you?
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VKXhCGjCOh0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
:lol:
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VKXhCGjCOh0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
:lol:
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/p4eTX96se_w" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
So idiot its alright for the NRA to use children as props but not Obama?
I personally think neither should but I am not a hypocrite like you.
Hey post some more stupid videos.
Ask the twenty kindergarten children in Newtown how THEY feel about assault weapons.
Go ahead, Skulshithead, ask them.
Go ahead, Skulshithead, ask them.
And the 5 people murdered with one yesterday including 3 young children.. ridiculous
Now duff.. Didnt you once tell me you had a large gun collection?? You dont have any assault rifles?
Look PussyChop, call the fucker that did it names and stop BLAMING LAW ABIDING CITIZENS for the Crimes of NUTBAGS.
TIA
I see nothing wrong with the ad? Its the truth :shrug:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/miSjgv1MH7s" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/miSjgv1MH7s" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
NRA's spokesman.
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/T5WrYMcaKfQ?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/T5WrYMcaKfQ?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Q2opf44tS_s?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qymUVjmHCZA?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
I find it interesting in this debate that people who want more gun control say that the way to stop violence is not with more violence.
Why does the presence of a gun connote violence?
I think it is pretty obvious that the presence of a police officer with a gun is a crime deterrent.
The issue with Pres Obama and his children and their school is that the school has 11 armed guards not counting the Secret Service protection.
So, having armed guards at an elite school for rich kids is not a 'violent' action but having armed guards at public schools would be?
Rich elite kids are better able to comprehend the difference between armed security staff and violent gun wielders?
Such a crock of horseshit yet at least half of America buys into it.
:facepalm:
Why does the presence of a gun connote violence?
I think it is pretty obvious that the presence of a police officer with a gun is a crime deterrent.
The issue with Pres Obama and his children and their school is that the school has 11 armed guards not counting the Secret Service protection.
So, having armed guards at an elite school for rich kids is not a 'violent' action but having armed guards at public schools would be?
Rich elite kids are better able to comprehend the difference between armed security staff and violent gun wielders?
Such a crock of horseshit yet at least half of America buys into it.
:facepalm:
