SEC 2006 Schedules

Status
Not open for further replies.

The Judge

Pura Vida!
Forum Member
Aug 5, 2004
4,909
29
0
SJO
SEC Feasts on Football Cupcakes
By: Paul Finebaum
The Mobile Register
Saturday, February 11, 2006


The SEC officially released the 2006 football schedules recently, and don't be surprised if season-ticket holders across the South start demanding their money back. There ought to a revolt. There should be class action suits. Yes, it's that bad.

Instead of scheduling quality games with the advent of the 12th game, many league members -- most notably Alabama -- have put together a woefully embarrassing slate that should universally turn off fans in record numbers.

The following is an analysis of the league members and a ranking of each team's four non-conference games. Stealing a page from the recruiting gurus, I have rated the non-conference opponents using the star system -- with five stars signifying a must-see game and a one-star rating the equivalent of watching a test pattern on your television screen.

Honestly, some of these games don't even rank one star but, in the spirit of fairness, every opponent will qualify for that distinction.

Here are the best and worst of the SEC's schedules with the star-ranking average in parentheses after the school name and the actual star ranking by the opponent:

-- 1. Tennessee (3.5*): California (5*), Air Force (3*), Marshall (3*), Memphis (3*) -- If there was a ever a year Phil Fulmer could have copped out and played a bunch of tomato cans, this would have been it, coming off a brutal 5-6 season (his only losing season). However, give Tennessee credit for a very strong non-conference slate, headed by California.

-- 2. Georgia (3.25*): Western Kentucky (1*), Colorado (4*), UAB (3*), Georgia Tech (5*) -- Another very nice slate, highlighted by Colorado early and Tech late.

-- 3. Florida (3.0*): Southern Miss (3*), Central Florida (3*), Western Carolina (1*), Florida State (5*) -- Considering the Gators traditionally end the season against FSU, one couldn't blame them for taking the easy way out with the rest of the schedule. Yet it's respectable with Southern Miss and upstart Central Florida (both 2005 bowl teams).

-- 4. (tie) LSU (2.75*): Louisiana-Lafayette (1*), Arizona (4*), Tulane (2*), Fresno State (4*) -- Certainly a solid non-conference slate with two dregs and two quality and interesting opponents.

-- 4. Mississippi State (2.75*): Tulane (2*), UAB (3*), West Virginia (5*), Jacksonville State (1*) -- Another school, considering its ineptitude in recent years, that would probably have been wiser to line up the four worst schools it could find (see Alabama's schedule). However, State has only one sure win in the lot and one sensational matchup with West Virginia at home.

-- 6. Ole Miss (2.5*): Memphis (3*), Wake Forest (2*), Missouri (4*), Northwestern State (1*) -- Ole Miss has been known for avoiding quality opponents for years, so the addition of Missouri is a step up. Memphis is an annual bloodletting, and playing Wake Forest is better than playing Duke.

-- 7. (tie) Arkansas (2.0*): Southern Cal (5*), Utah State (1*), SE Missouri State (1*), Louisiana-Monroe (1*) -- The Hogs clearly have the best non-conference game in the SEC (against the Trojans), but the other three are so putrid it might be hard to notice.

-- 7. Auburn (2.0*): Washington State (4*), Buffalo (1*), Tulane (2*), Arkansas State (1*) -- The opener is a quality matchup (although WSU has fallen on hard times since Mike Price took it to the Rose Bowl three years ago). The rest of the games should be flushed down the disposal.

-- 7. South Carolina (2.0*): Wofford (1*), Florida Atlantic (1*), Middle Tennessee (1*), Clemson (5*) -- Not much to look at here until you get to the end.

-- 7. Vanderbilt (2.0*): Michigan (5*), Tennessee State (1*), Kent State (1*), Duke (1*) -- Playing Michigan is big-time, but the rest are beyond woeful. However, it gives Vandy more time to study and defend its SEC championship (league's smartest athletes).

-- 11. Kentucky (1.75*): Louisville (4*), Texas State (1*), Central Michigan (1*), Louisiana-Monroe (1*) -- This schedule was saved only by a quality opener against Louisville.

-- 12. Alabama (1.25*): Hawaii (2*), Louisiana-Monroe (1*), Duke (1*), Florida International (1*) -- This might be the most embarrassing schedule of non-conference opponents any school has put together in the history of college football. Alabama is the only school in the SEC, according to this ranking, that doesn't play a non-conference team ranked above a two-star. Everyone else plays at least a four-star. As a matter of fact, the home schedule -- including SEC games -- might be the Tide's worst ever. It begins with Hawaii and is followed by Vanderbilt, Louisiana-Monroe, Duke, Ole Miss, Florida International, Mississippi State and is only salvaged by the finale against Auburn. Overall, of the 12 opponents Alabama will face in 2006, only three schools had winning seasons last year.
 

DerekNJND

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 21, 2005
2,022
4
0
44
Jersey
The Judge said:
SEC Feasts on Football Cupcakes
By: Paul Finebaum
The Mobile Register
Saturday, February 11, 2006


-- 12. Alabama (1.25*): Hawaii (2*), Louisiana-Monroe (1*), Duke (1*), Florida International (1*) -- This might be the most embarrassing schedule of non-conference opponents any school has put together in the history of college football.

If I was a 'Bama fan, give me my money back. I'm not joking. That is pathetic
 

Double Two

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 18, 2001
33,784
627
113
61
Pelham, Alabama USA
First, to answer your question DerekNJND, Auburn won the National Championship in 1957. Secondly, there are a couple of things everyone needs to know about the reporter who wrote this piece. Paul Finebaum went to college at University of Tennessee so rating Tennesse's non-conference schedule as the best and "hated" Alabama's as the worst should not come as a shocker. Living in the Birmingham, Alabama area since 1976, I saw Paul start out as reporter for the Post-Herald. Now he has a statewide radio show and is well known in the southeast. His style is to "rock the boat" or "shake things up" especially when it comes to Alabama Football. Having said that he does makes some good points in this piece. I just thought that everyone here at MJ's needed some background on this reporter.DT:)

PS(DerekNJND)--War"Damn" Eagle!!!;):D
 

DIRTY Diapers

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 13, 2005
2,670
5
0
47
Indianapolis
Double Two said:
First, to answer your question DerekNJND, Auburn won the National Championship in 1957. Secondly, there are a couple of things everyone needs to know about the reporter who wrote this piece. Paul Finebaum went to college at University of Tennessee so rating Tennesse's non-conference schedule as the best and "hated" Alabama's as the worst should not come as a shocker. Living in the Birmingham, Alabama area since 1976, I saw Paul start out as reporter for the Post-Herald. Now he has a statewide radio show and is well known in the southeast. His style is to "rock the boat" or "shake things up" especially when it comes to Alabama Football. Having said that he does makes some good points in this piece. I just thought that everyone here at MJ's needed some background on this reporter.DT:)

PS(DerekNJND)--War"Damn" Eagle!!!;):D


Yeah - The writer made a huge mistake. Hawaii, WSU, Lousiana - Monroe, Duke, and Florida International are powerhouses. Thanks for clearing that up double two. LOL.
 

dlvlsu

Registered
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2002
588
2
0
Actually I think Auburn won NC in 1959 year after LSU in 1958. Pretty sure about that but havent got time to look it up.
 

DerekNJND

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 21, 2005
2,022
4
0
44
Jersey
Double Two said:
First, to answer your question DerekNJND, Auburn won the National Championship in 1957.

I just thought that everyone here at MJ's needed some background on this reporter.DT:)

PS(DerekNJND)--War"Damn" Eagle!!!;):D

I dont understand your need to disrupt someone's thread to comment on my "signature profile". That is really irrelevant to the forum in general. Email me if you have a problem with what I say, dont put it in the public domain where it is off-topic. But congrats to Auburn for their title in 1957! One title definately solidify's their status as "elite".

This is exactly why you cant respond to someone's "signature" in a thread that has NOTHING to do with it!

dlvlsu said:
Actually I think Auburn won NC in 1959 year after LSU in 1958. Pretty sure about that but havent got time to look it up.

before you know it, every SEC fan comes out from under their rock to start debating Auburn's national title history when that has NOTHING to do with the schedules of the upcoming year!

:mj22:
And I dont think the background is that important. Alabama's schedule speaks for itself. Maybe this guy beefed up Tennessee's schedule a little, but the point of the post is the general mediocrity, and downright PATHETIC nature of some schools at the bottom, such as Bama.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AU2001

dlvlsu

Registered
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2002
588
2
0
Sorry Double Two it was 57 Ole miss was 60 must have been what I was thinking of! Sorry SEC was strong those few years(AS always!!!!)
 

dlvlsu

Registered
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2002
588
2
0
SEC bother you Bo-Derek??? When you play tough teams in your conference you need a few patsies(SEC is strongest football all around conference)as I have stated before but must admit bama taken it alittle to far!!
 

blgstocks

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2005
3,181
12
0
So. Cal
I dont know when these guys made the schedules because i saw a peice on VT scheduling 12 years ahead of time to fit WVU back in their schedule! So on one hand some of these teams might have been decent at the time the scheduled them.

On another hand even if they werent that respectable, If you are a fan f one of those cupcake schools that dont ever see anybody but cupcakes I think it is good that they get to play a major name from the SEC. So I think it is good that powerhouses schedule some of the teams off the beaten track. U never know you might have a matchup like Fresno St and USC last year, which was 1 of the most exciting games of the year. Not saying any of these teams is fresno st, im just saying its good for their programs and gives everyone a chance to prove what they got.
 

oldschoolcapper

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 3, 2004
417
0
0
I thought he was still banned.

The SEC bashers can talk all they want, but no other conference is as tough week in and week out. Why not throw in a few patsys when you're going to have to play 4 or 5 ranked teams every year?


osc
 

DIRTY Diapers

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 13, 2005
2,670
5
0
47
Indianapolis
oldschoolcapper said:
I thought he was still banned.

The SEC bashers can talk all they want, but no other conference is as tough week in and week out. Why not throw in a few patsys when you're going to have to play 4 or 5 ranked teams every year?


osc

SEC = Average teams who play a horrid OOC schedule.
 

DerekNJND

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 21, 2005
2,022
4
0
44
Jersey
Double Two said:
No offense intended DerekNJND. I will never post a reply to one of your threads again.

Its not my thread to start with, and you didnt reply to my POST, you replied to my SIGNATURE that goes on the bottom of ALL MY POSTS...but why start making comments about my profile? Then before you know it, you have people chiming into the thread with NOTHING to say about the SEC schedules, just comments about Auburns national titles and their personal grudges against me.

See: Taoist, Dlvlsu, OldschoolIdiot
 
Last edited:

DerekNJND

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 21, 2005
2,022
4
0
44
Jersey
oldschoolcapper said:
The SEC bashers can talk all they want, but no other conference is as tough week in and week out. Why not throw in a few patsys when you're going to have to play 4 or 5 ranked teams every year?


osc

Wow a post with information, inaccurate as usual, but at least you arent posting about my "joke" of a legal career anymore. I guess you saw my reply and took my advice.

FYI, most competitive teams in major conferences play 4 ranked teams a year. I dont see how that justifies a team playing 4 of the worst teams in the country..

oh, did I mention HOME GAMES against 4 of the worst teams in the country?? :talk:
 

DIRTY Diapers

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 13, 2005
2,670
5
0
47
Indianapolis
blgstocks said:
This guy sure doesnt know football if thats what the SEC equals in his book


2005/2006 Bowl Record Win/Loss SEC teams

Bowl Record
3 Wins
3 Losses

SEC vs Out of Conference BCS Eligible teams

2 Wins
6 Loses

Looks like an average conference IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Bet on MyBookie
Top