Sorry whiney libs: Tapes prove Saddam WMD Deception

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
I know this will upset the liberals... :violin:

Anyone watch Nightline last night? It finally looks like the lid is slowly starting to come off. Saddam deceived the world.


"We did not reveal the volume of the chemical weapons that we had produced. We did not reveal the type of the chemical weapons. We did not reveal the truth about the volume of the imported materials. Therefore sir, if they want to create problems, I see that our argument now is that biological is everything." -Saddam's son-in-law


link:

http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Investigation/story?id=1623307&page=1
 

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
"I go back to the question of whether we should reveal everything or continue to be silent. Sir, since the meeting has taken this direction, I would say it is in our interest not to reveal. Not just out of fear of disclosing the technology we achieved, or to hide it for future work. No. The game has gone on for too long. And now it has become clear to many officials of countries that are coerced to work with America?"
 

Heyward

Registered User
Forum Member
May 12, 2002
767
0
0
54
NC
Sorry to disappoint a whiny conservative, but this doesn't upset me. I don't think anybody disagrees with the possiblity that Saddam had chemical or biological weapons at some point. The real debate is over whether or not Saddam's WMD ambitions were an immediate threat to the U.S., and whether or not this WMD line was the real motivation for the invasion.
 

Heyward

Registered User
Forum Member
May 12, 2002
767
0
0
54
NC
CHARLESMANSON said:
I guess Saddam didn't want nukes huh?

"As for the nuclear, we say we have disclosed everything but no."


Nobody with any sense ever said Saddam didn't want nukes. Sure he did. Almost every nation probably has some desire for that capability. No news there.
 

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
If you don't think Saddam was a threat then that's your problem not mine. Nice way to spin things. Typical whiney liberal living in partisan denial.

Oh yeah, and I guess we invaded Iraq for Halliburton!!

:142lmao:

This is exactly why I don't post in here anymore. It's like a moveon.org convention. Have fun guys!!!
:fingerc:
 

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
Evidence coming out about Saddam's deception and Kosar yawns. Iraq is the most important issue that has been debated. Priceless. The truth hurts. :violin:
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
CHARLESMANSON said:
Evidence coming out about Saddam's deception and Kosar yawns. Priceless. The truth hurts.

Is it really news that Saddam was deceptive and that he wanted nukes? (yawn)
 

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
You just hate the fact that Bush was right all along Kosar!!!!!!

Obviously to a liberal like you, it is not news. You guys hate seeing stuff like this and I think it's great!! I was expecting this type of response.

Looks like "Bush lied, people died"...crashes and burns!!!!

:fingerc:
 
Last edited:

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
CHARLESMANSON said:
You just hate the fact that Bush was right all along Kosar!!!!!!

Obviously to a liberal like you, it is not news. You guys hate seeing stuff like this and I think it's great!! I was expecting this type of response.

Looks like "Bush lied, people died"...crashes and burns!!!!

:fingerc:

It's not news because anybody with half a brain knew 15 years ago that Saddam was deceptive and would have loved to have nukes.

What was Bush right about, exactly?
 

Heyward

Registered User
Forum Member
May 12, 2002
767
0
0
54
NC
CHARLESMANSON said:
You just hate the fact that Bush was right all along Kosar!!!!!!

Obviously to a liberal like you, it is not news. You guys hate seeing stuff like this and I think it's great!! I was expecting this type of response.

Looks like "Bush lied, people died"...crashes and burns!!!!

:fingerc:

Who said Bush was wrong about Saddam wanting nukes? Of course he wanted them. So does South Korea, Iran, etc. What are you even talking about?
 

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
Again, this is why I don't waste my time in here anymore. You liberals are a joke. Don't play dumb Heyward. If you don't know what I am talking about then click on the link I posted. It's plain and simple.

This isn't just about nukes.

It's about Saddam hiding chemical and biological weapons and programs and lying about it. He deceived the world. Thank god Bush removed him from power. And all you guys said "Bush lied"!!!!

Whenever you liberals are proven wrong you just play dumb and yawn and act confused lol. This thread is a perfect example!

"We did not reveal the volume of the chemical weapons that we had produced. We did not reveal the type of the chemical weapons. We did not reveal the truth about the volume of the imported materials." :fingerc:
 
Last edited:

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
Hell Heyward even your good buddy Bill Clinton said the best solution to Saddam's deception is REGIME CHANGE.

Live in denial. The life of a crybaby complaining liberal. :142crying
 

ctownguy

Life is Good
Forum Member
Jul 27, 2000
3,065
16
0
SoCal
Heyward said:
Who said Bush was wrong about Saddam wanting nukes? Of course he wanted them. So does South Korea, Iran, etc. What are you even talking about?


What he is talking about is that after 9/11 occurred this country had to take these middle eastern terrorists states much more seriously than before. AND YES IRAQ WAS ONE OF THEM.

NOT ONLY WERE THEY KNOWN FOR TRAINING TERRORISTS AND HARBORING THEM, THEY WERE TRYING TO GET OR ALREADY HAVING WMD'S, WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE, THEY WERE A THREAT.

Then add in at the time we had pretty much neutralized Afghanistan, we had this dictator snubbing his nose at the UN (bubba's great foreign policy makers) time and again. What was it, 15 to 16 last time resolutions broken and they did nothing. WHAT A JOKE.

WE COULD HAVE PICKED ANY COUNTRY OVER THEIR TO PURSUE THESE HEAD CUTTING OFF ANIMALS, BUT Bush picked Iraq because of ALL THE INTELLIGENCE AT THAT TIME, believed by both sides. AND YES WE HAD A HISTORY THERE, WE HAD BEATEN THEIR ASS BEFORE.

Couple that with all the so called snubbing of world opinion by hussein thru the Fuc****** UN, it was needed to show that someone meaning us would stand up to these terrorists states.

That's what Bush did and I know you on the left don't, didn't and never will like it but he made a stand and whether the left likes it or not We have shown the world that we will not be intimidated or take anything from these terrorists pigs and will pursue them anywhere we feel is necessary.

This is what was needed to help stabilize this region and Bush has not punked out like bubba did in Mogadishu sic whatever when he pulled out.What an embarrassment that was to the world. Think that had anything to do with bin laden thinking he could get away with 9/11.

All Bush is doing is staying the course and thank God for that.
 

Heyward

Registered User
Forum Member
May 12, 2002
767
0
0
54
NC
CHARLESMANSON said:
Again, this is why I don't waste my time in here anymore. You liberals are a joke. Don't play dumb Heyward. If you don't know what I am talking about then click on the link I posted. It's plain and simple.

This isn't just about nukes.

It's about Saddam hiding chemical and biological weapons and programs and lying about it. He deceived the world. Thank god Bush removed him from power. And all you guys said "Bush lied"!!!!

Whenever you liberals are proven wrong you just play dumb and yawn and act confused lol. This thread is a perfect example!
[/B] :fingerc:

How old are you, 12? You calling people crybabies is funny after reading the maturity level of your posts. I'm not playing dumb. Your third post implied that there was somebody in the world who thought Saddam didn't want nukes. That's not me playing dumb, that's you sounding dumb. Big difference.

Also, there aren't any liberals who claim that Saddam never had chemical or biological weapons. Hell, the US may have given him some of them to fight against Iran.

What Bush lied about was his motivation for invading Iraq. It wasn't because he found out that Iraq had chemical weapons back in 1995 (the article you cite), it wasn't because Iraq was going to attack the US, it wasn't because Iraq was involved in 9/11, and it wasn't because he felt a compassionate desire to liberate the poor, oppressed people of Iraq. He did lie. People continue to die. You calling people crybabies or saying we have "cooties" or whatever your next intelligent post is doesn't change that.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
I guess the tapes prove Clinton and that long list of Democrats where right. Thank you for bring it to our attention.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Saddam told us in 90 a possible attack may come. That it was not from him. That was when we were still in love with him. He had not invaded Kuwait yet. Is this true like rest of this story or just more BS.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Charles posts - twice - in this thread that "This is why I don't waste my time posting in here anymore"...and then goes on another time-wasting tirade or 20.

I guess you are just "staying on course", like your Eminency, eh?

Ah, it is strangely good to have you back, Charles. It will be tougher to wade through the 30 quote posts a day again, but hey, we all have time to waste here, right?

;142loser:
 

larryowen

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 21, 2005
82
0
0
Face it Charlie the dems have to find a way to discredit Bush if the want Hillary in 2008.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top