<iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/K8E_zMLCRNg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
The Obama's plan is to continue to spend $4.1 billion per day (yes, that is a real number representing how much our debt goes up everyday). Thankfully we got a Republican House or he'd be spending twice that.
The Congress' plan is to continue to spend $4.1 billion per day (yes, that is a real number representing how much our debt goes up everyday). Thankfully we got a Republican House helping to spend that money.
Wall Street bankers & hedge fund managers, defense contractors, subsidized oil and mining companies and corporate farmers, et. al. might disagree with you, Bob.Duff, maybe that makes you feel better but, it doesn't do anything for the country.
OK then...The Obama's plan is, UNDER HIS LEADERSHIP and with both houses controlled by democrats for two years, spending has jumped to $4.1 billion dollars per day based on The Obama's sign-off on every dollar spent and every budget approved.
Duff, maybe that makes you feel better but, it doesn't do anything for the country.
Not sure where your debating skills went, SDD. :shrug:Who says capitalism doesn't or can't provide those things, Trench? You - an avowed Socialist?
You guys are a real comedy team.
No sooner do I have to correct you as to who controls expenditures, you're right back making another bogus claim. Our deficit, a bit over one trillion dollars for 2010, is almost entirely the result of expenditures put in place by Bush and republican controlled congress.
First off, The Obama(as you call him) hasn't signed off on any budget since congress hasn't sent him any.
Bush inherited a Federal budget in surplus from Clinton. If Bush hadn't fucked it up, we were on track to pay off the entire debt.
He then proceeded to piss that surplus away plus almost another trillion per year.
Here is is, you add it up:
$373 billion/yr for Medicare part D, enacted under Bush with not one penny of increased revenue or one penny of spending cuts to pay for it.
$171 billion/yr for unnecessary wars in Iraq and Afghanistan without one penny of increased revenue of one penny of spending cuts to pay for them.
$250 billion/yr for the Bush tax cuts without one penny of increased revenue, or one penny of spending cuts.
A $10 billion/yr subsidy to ethanol producers which has driven food prices up by many billions, without one penny of increased revenue or one penny of spending cuts.
Which of those do you wish to blame on Obama?
Duff, maybe that makes you feel better but, it doesn't do anything for the country.
No, azbob, it doesn't make me feel well at all that we are running a huge deficit.
But it pisses me off even more when Republicans pretend that they are fiscally responsible, when, in fact, they are just the opposite.
Facts, azbob, facts. Try them sometime in place of fiction.
Who thinks the TSA does a better job than a private company?.
...Fed Express vs. the Post Office...
Please stop posting, Skulnik.
Duff...it is obvious that you need to be taken care of so The Obama can crowd you into his baby buggy and make your decisions, finance your needs and rule your life.
Some how, this country was able to grow and thrive utilizing the talents and ambition of its people to create companies and offer opportunities. It's nice that you can cite the TSA and Post Office as shinining lights of success for government control but, 90% of the people who read that will quietly laugh and move one...so will I.
$0.42 just isn't cutting it.
http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/business/news/article_1647048.php/FedEx-profits-soar-while-US-public-post-service-stops-pensions
Just like Borders, the USPS is a failing business model. Borders is done. Unless the USPS can revamp, it should be done as well.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.
