Four dead Americans and Obama didn't help them, they were in the Situation Room, watching and rooting for the Muslims.
JMO
:shrug:
JMO
:shrug:
White House knew about Libya attacks
- Thread starter Skulnik
- Start date
4 dead Americans.
7 hour attack.
Requests from CIA and Spec Ops to assist were denied.
4 dead Americans - one being the ambassador - who is treated as a surrogate for the President himself and is considered a 4-star.
/Ambassador in peril is the language that will come across...
The only more desperate msg would be:
/Ambassador missing
Now, you guys want to say this is not a story?
A spontaneous "riot" would not be using rocket propelled grenades and mortars.
7 hour attack.
Requests from CIA and Spec Ops to assist were denied.
4 dead Americans - one being the ambassador - who is treated as a surrogate for the President himself and is considered a 4-star.
/Ambassador in peril is the language that will come across...
The only more desperate msg would be:
/Ambassador missing
Now, you guys want to say this is not a story?
A spontaneous "riot" would not be using rocket propelled grenades and mortars.
First of all Skul, the lone and only source for this entire ruse is a Fox News source. A source that says he "spoke to those that were close to the exchange", yet cannot identify this source, only to say it is an active agent in the CIA speaking out anonymously.
So let me get this straight, you believe that a Fox news reporter was able to "get in touch with CIA operatives who were on the ground during the time of the attack"? So, operatives who now would run the risk of having their safe houses compromised, their identity compromised and if that isn't enough, they have decided to forego their oath with the threat of imprisonment and worse by releasing sensitive information. Information that has a direct impact on National Security. These operatives risked all this, suddenly, now after years of service, now? Correct? That is what you believe? Mostly because we know how truthful Fox News is and how much integrity they have in their professional responsibility to report nothing but the facts. Funny how this vital and now viral information only came out a week before Willard the liar is about to get his ass handed to him don't you think?
You forget Skul, I am not your average stooge. I do the research. You should do the same and when common sense tells you to question everything you don't personally see, feel, taste, hear or touch, listen.
Hope that helps,
FDC
So let me get this straight, you believe that a Fox news reporter was able to "get in touch with CIA operatives who were on the ground during the time of the attack"? So, operatives who now would run the risk of having their safe houses compromised, their identity compromised and if that isn't enough, they have decided to forego their oath with the threat of imprisonment and worse by releasing sensitive information. Information that has a direct impact on National Security. These operatives risked all this, suddenly, now after years of service, now? Correct? That is what you believe? Mostly because we know how truthful Fox News is and how much integrity they have in their professional responsibility to report nothing but the facts. Funny how this vital and now viral information only came out a week before Willard the liar is about to get his ass handed to him don't you think?
You forget Skul, I am not your average stooge. I do the research. You should do the same and when common sense tells you to question everything you don't personally see, feel, taste, hear or touch, listen.
Hope that helps,
FDC
FatDaddyCool
You forget Skul, I am not your average stooge. I do the research. You should do the same and when common sense tells you to question everything you don't personally see, feel, taste, hear or touch, listen.
I'll try to remember that.
Mostly because we know how truthful Fox News is and how much integrity they have in their professional responsibility to report nothing but the facts.
I forgot that FOX News doctored the Trayvon Martin 911 Tape.
You forget Skul, I am not your average stooge. I do the research. You should do the same and when common sense tells you to question everything you don't personally see, feel, taste, hear or touch, listen.
I'll try to remember that.
Mostly because we know how truthful Fox News is and how much integrity they have in their professional responsibility to report nothing but the facts.
I forgot that FOX News doctored the Trayvon Martin 911 Tape.
- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
FDC you appear to be a smart individual. The administration screwed the pooch on this one. Backing the non action when needed with American lives dead in the end does not lead me to think you have done the research necessary to be a leading voice of clarity on this one. Try again bud.
First of all, you are basing your argument on supposition as the only news organization reporting what Skul's story was Fox. Now, when the conflict started and authorities were notified I imagine it was handled according to protocol, and not being personally familiar with their protocol I cannot possibly begin to tell you where the failures started. The problem I have with all this bullshit is that none of this is news unless it is a week before the election and the GOP is desperate, as it is. The partisan news organization that is reporting it make far too many assumptions for my liking and I don't willingly allow myself to be duped just because something is repeated time and time again regardless of fact.
So let's look at some facts;
There was an attack on the Libyan consulate.
The initial attack and subsequent deaths all happened within the first hour, the rest of the the "attack" chronicled by your own heroes at Fox to be a total of just over 7 hours. Unfortunately, Fox doesn't delineate between the time elapsed during the Libyan rescue operation, looters, protesters that showed up later. As long as there were Libyans entering the consulate and leaving the consulate, it's good enough. I know of no administration that would send troops in to any armed conflict on foreign soil in a reaction time of 7 hours do you? Should we have sent in troops to a hostile area without recognizance and strategic planning? I find it hysterical that you provide a body count of 4 to drive the point home on how bad the President is but you haven't attached that same rate of failure for all the deaths in two unnecessary wars that G. W. put us into on false intelligence, yet republicans are so quick to defend his motives.
My point is this, if you want to provide the undecided with thoughtful and factual posts to stimulate them to think about who would be best to serve all citizens of our country than I would applaud the efforts. Unfortunately, this is a misguided attempt to skew public perception and obfuscate the facts in order to degrade the Presidents record and resolve. The problem with that is, and this is clearly evident when Skul replied to me with some completely off topic remark without defending my attack on his position, your candidate has no position in this conflict. This isn't even an object of contention as Willard has never ever ever had to lead anyone anywhere in any armed conflict. Unless of course he has had some Mormonic celestial battle in a former life on planet Kobol.
Hope this helps,
FDC
Tramp, I think this is a good time to post up that video u made of this nitwit being interviewed :mj07:
What the hell does that have to do with this bullshit you are posting? Skul, you and I both know you cannot defend this nor can you defend Glenn Beck and his record of responsible journalism because there isn't one and you know I would eat you alive on here if you did. Period, end of argument. You know exactly what this story is and it is pundit rhetoric and supposition. To insinuate that the entire staff sat around and watched American's die based solely on the word of an unnamed Fox News source is what is problematic if not downright treason. The fact you try to pass it off as fact is very telling to me.
Look dude, I know you hate Obama more than you like the Republicans but don't you think that every United States citizen should be responsible of their own actions? Don't you think it is every adults responsibility to society to ensure the prosperity of the nation's children through any means necessary? So why would you purposely post slanderous statements based on supposition of our President. Can't you find anything about Willard Romney that informs us of his policies and stances on issues that would help someone to make an educated decision on who they are going to vote for? All your posts scream the same shit, "my guy doesn't suck as much as your guy". You then sling as much mud at the President as you can, regardless of fact, and then say "see I told you so?" I mean, that is the campaign plan for Romney right, so you are just following suit? I hope not bro. I really truly hope not. Be more responsible with your posts bro, try to make some positive changes rather than negative ones. No format is too small to have an effect on others.
Hope that helps,
FDC
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/a9tXekIVTsc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
I wish I had Superior Research like other people, it turns out I was WRONG about FOX NEWS.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/72zJvVQWutA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
That father had no right to talk bad about Obama , Biden and Clinton. :shrug:
No, he got his ass handed to him from someone that knows better, much like you do pretty consistently. We are talking about Skul right? I noticed, and so does everybody else, that there are no, none, zero replies defending this bullshit so go get your shine box.
Their #1 line of attack in the final stretch of the campaign has been to exploit an attack a diplomatic outpost(which happened 12 times on Bush's watch).
I am not saying he didn't have a right to talk bad about anybody but you are trying to use the video as some sort of evidence to support your position when this is all just conjecture. It provides nothing in the way of support to your argument or accusations.
Hope this helps,
FDC
- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
