saturday 9/13/03 college football plays w/short-writeups......

Status
Not open for further replies.

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
season: 6-2 (+8.4 units)

one stands out for now. will add to this list periodically throughout the week as the lines run their course and become more favorable.

1 unit....miami, ohio (-3.5) over northwestern

on the surface, this goes against the capping maxim of laying road chalk to a power conference team, but i think the redhawks are well justified to be laying some points here. the two teams come in with very different mindsets. northwestern is in off of a down-to-the-wire loss to air force on saturday where they flat out gave the falcons the game (cats led 21-7 going into the 4th quarter only to lose 22-21 after air force had a rushing TD, returned an interception to the house, and then eventually won it on a short field goal on a later possession). miami comes in and will be very well prepared, having a full 2 weeks off to make adjustments following their loss in iowa. roethlisberger had a tough time vs iowa (4 INTs) but facing iowa and facing northwestern are two entirely different things. northwestern has a perenially porous defense that is susceptible to the big play. with miami having 2 weeks to prepare for this one, i think this one has points galore from both teams, and miami quite honestly is a much more sound football team- even though the cats are a power conference program. also, its worth noting that northwestern is going to have to adjust to a completely different scheme from last week to this week. air force was an exclusively option team where northwestern could gear for the run every play. now they have to make a quick turnaround and scheme for a redhawk team thats probably going to throw 40-45 times. and i dont think the cats are good enough to stop miami. also, it seems like the line is telling me something here- its rare to see a mac team other than marshall lay anything on the road to a power team. roethlisberger and the redhawks bounce back and should win a high scoring game by 7-10 points.
 

mjbarley

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 9, 2001
65
0
0
SD, CA
gman,

I'm with you on your reasoning here. I just posted to a thread started by Master Capper, and totally agree with your logic on this game.

mj
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
1 unit.....louisiana tech (+11) over michigan state
really think this is a spot where michigan state can struggle. while the spartans are scoring and moving the ball well on offense this year, their defense leaves a lot to be desired, especially against the pass- and thats latech's bread and butter. although its just 2 games in, it appears msu just doesnt have that killer instinct. they had a chance to cover both games this year, but they seem to allow teams to stick around. tech should be able to hang within a touchdown. also worth noting that michigan state has two huge games on deck and this could be a big time flat spot. this is their 3rd of three games vs inferior teams (western michigan, rutgers, and now latech) and the spartans have games with #14 notre dame and #19 iowa coming up the next two weeks. msu has never been a real "disciplined" team in terms of taking care of business and not looking ahead. i think this game will stay very close throughout.
 

hellah10

WOOFJUICE
Forum Member
Oct 24, 2001
7,958
0
0
44
Toledo
you like miami
I like miami

I dont think weve ever lost when we agreed on a game..

here`s to both of us! :toast:
 

najeff

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2003
28
0
0
totally disagree wit you on mich st. smoker is greatful to be back and will play his a$$ off every week. the bottom line is that you have a big time program on the upswing against a small program.

betting 101 says it's msu or no play at all!
 

buddy

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 21, 2000
10,897
85
0
Pittsburgh, Pa.
"Don't know much about hi-sto-ry,
don't know much biology,
don't know much about algebra,
don't know what a slide rule is for,

But I do know that I like Tech,
And I do know what lies on deck,
What A Wonderful Game This Will Be."
 

Got5onIt

MeanGreen
Forum Member
Oct 20, 2002
1,177
0
36
45
MeanGreen Nation
najeff said:
totally disagree wit you on mich st. smoker is greatful to be back and will play his a$$ off every week. the bottom line is that you have a big time program on the upswing against a small program.

betting 101 says it's msu or no play at all!

I wouldn't call these wins a blowout:
Mich St. 26 Western Michigan 21
Mich St. 44 Rutgers 28


I think La Tech keeps this one close. I'm on 'em! :D
 

najeff

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2003
28
0
0
i said upswing, never mentioned blowouts. msu feels good about itself compared to year ago. plus a new coach has a lot to proove. msu will be in this game emotionally. just don't see la tech staying close on the road!
 

BBMF

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 28, 2001
495
2
0
68
Hopkins, MN USA
Gotta agree with najeff: Michigan State, while only a mediocre Big 10 team is home. I make it MSU 27 LaTech 17.

Too close a game for me to lay 11. May better games on the board.:cool:
 

hornsfan2

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 20, 2002
72
0
0
no offense BBMF, but if you agree with that score you are predicting I think you should lean towards La. Tech and not Smoker the Coker. I understand, it is very close to lay 11 and also to take 11, but if that is what you think the score will be you should probably start leaning to the Bulldogs, right?

either way, I like La Tech in this spot. I watched their game against Miami and yes they were not impressive, but if I remember 2 TDs in the first half were off of a punt and and int return. La Tech put together about 3 drives that were impressive and got in scoring position, but they couldn't stick it in against the tough Miami D. Does MSU have that kind of D this year? Not even close. McCown can be the real deal if he avoids making the dumb pass that has led to all of his career INT's. I do agree Smoker has been impressive and this could be a tough spot for the Bulldogs, but I don't think they should be getting 11 and will gladly take the points.

good luck
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
"najeff" (i still get a kick out of this alias you picked, since youre too ashamed and dont have the balls to bash me under the same one youve used for the last 2 years)

just so i can plan ahead- will you be offering your "football betting 101" strategies for the entire year?

last i remember, you were tapped out of your carib account and banned from 2 forums for starting sh1t with people.

like i said, im not too worried because its only a matter of time before you lose all your money to carib (again) and then start bashing in full force again- thus putting the noose around your own neck and basically banning yourself.

but hey- if you want to keep giving my post hits, go for it. its flattering.
 

najeff

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2003
28
0
0
you are very immature. i said i did not agree with your la tech pick. HOW IS THAT BASHING?

i do believe this is a forum where differing opinions are welcomed! please grow up and stop trying to cause trouble or start something that's not here.

good luck with your plays
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
"najeff" (my god i cant even type that with a straight face, seeing as we know who you are)

why is it that many others have recognized the same thing that i mentioned- that youre a sh1t starter. take a look at your posts in the last week.

seriously- what amazes me is that after 2 yrs, you still havent gotten bored with following me from forum to forum and starting sh1t in my threads.

of course your MO is to come in, bash, and start sh1t. then when the forum tells you to shut your mouth and grow up, you come with the "who? what? me?" line.

you need to become more original.
 

Patron

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 19, 2003
60
0
0
48
Parkersburg, WVA
najeff, I wouldn't pay gman any mind, he has some nerve talking about anyone being banned at forums this is about his 6th forum, had to leave the last one for stiffing people.
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
same ol same ol.

ill keep doing what ive done for years. ill post plays, post good information, and keep winning 53-56% of my games.

really amazes me that guys will come into my threads to flame me. they figure if they make up enough sh1t about me maybe people will believe it.

it doesnt take a genius to realize im here doing my best to help, and assimilating information from other guys here as well.

theres always gonna be guys who have self-esteem issues. always amazes me when i see guys who are out simply to start trouble.

oh well. thats life.
 

JEFF

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 30, 2001
2,165
0
0
gman, don't even waste your time dude. This site seems to track a lot of nutjobs. BTW, nice start and GL this weekend.
 

najeff

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2003
28
0
0
gman, good luck on your plays! you will probably find a bash in that statement! (lmfao). funny how my posts to you concerned msu/la tech and all yours to me are the nonsense

remember we are all her to beat the man!
 

bvinnieb

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 5, 2002
511
2
18
NJ
gman2

gman2

FuK these guys. I have never posted to you, but I have followed you and made money. People are wacked to say the least.

Put them on the pay no mind list and they will go away. By the way, thanks for your selections and continued success.

Regards,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Bet on MyBookie
Top