Everything people are saying about Pedro in game #5, the same handicappers thought the same in game #1 and Pedro was not vintage Pedro, giving up 4 walks, only K'ing 3, and throwing 130 pitches... the most he has all season.
Don't let the "Pedro mystique" cloud your judgement I keep telling people! The linesmakers hiked this line all the way up b/c JohnQ public and even pro cappers can't see past the Pedro of the past.
Zito is 2-0 vs. Boston this year, Pedro is 0-2, Pedro is .500 pitcher on the road, Boston is .500 team on the road, Oakland has won L6, and 59-24 at home.
Everyone talks about Manny & Nomar breaking out big this game, etc. based on one inning in game #4. That was only one inning! And the same argument can be made in reverse for Tejada and Chavez who are 2-for-37 this series! Yet the A's should've won both games #3 and #4. So maybe Manny & Nomar start hitting... but maybe Tejada and Chavez break out. How do you discount that? How do you lay the wood for a road team with a pitcher throwing the most pitches he has all year, and his last start he was sloppy?
Everyone "believed" in Pedro in game #1 and it didn't work out. Why make the same mistake twice? Just b/c he's "the best pitcher in baseball" ?? Is he really the same Pedro? What did game #1 tell you?
Just my 2 cents. Good luck.