Week 6 Systems Plays

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
The systems ended last week going 10-7.

The breakdown:
System #4: 1-1
System #5: 0-1
System #7: 1-0
System #8: 2-0
System #10: 1-0
System #16: 1-0
System #18: 3-3
System #21: 0-1
System #22: 1-0
System #23: 0-1

That's a lot of plays! I don't play them all, but I use it as just one more thing to keep in mind when handicapping.

This week we have a bunch more. We've also got a number of potential plays which are only in effect if the right line and/or total occurs. Also, this is the third straight week where none of the systems go against each other. Unreal.

Two teams come out overwhelmingly strong on these systems this week - Dallas and the NY Jets. Please, don't anyone go crazy on these just because each of these teams appears in multiple systems. I still refuse to bet more than 1 unit on any team 98% of the time. When I do break that rule I might go 1.5 or 2 units, that's it. There are no sure things!!

Ok, here are the systems which are in effect this week...

System #3 - Play on a home dog if they won their last game outright, and their opponent was at home last week (90-44-6, 67.2% since '90).

Play on: Green Bay (if they are the dog), Dallas (if they are the dog)

System #4 - Play on a home team that won it's last two games, both on the road (59-36-5, 62.1% since '89).

Play on: Indianapolis

System #5 - Play on the home team when both teams have won 2 straight SU (74-47-2, 61.2% since '89).

Play on: Indianapolis, Green Bay, Dallas

System #7 - Play on a home favorite of 3 or less that won outright on the road last week (61-37-7, 62.2% since '91).

Play on: Cleveland (if line stays at -3 or less)

System #8 - Play against a home favorite coming off their bye week (39-21-1, 65% since '98). **updated**

Play on: Atlanta

System #14 - Play on any home dog of 3 pts if the total is 37 or less (31-19, 62% since 1983).

Play on: Washington, Jacksonville, NY Jets (in all cases line must stay at +3, and total must be 37 or less, or no play)

System #16 - Play against a team that won but failed to cover last week, and is favored again this week. (23-3, 88.5% since start of '02, including 13-2, 86.7% when the team in question was favored on the road). **updated**

Play on: Dallas (if dog), NY Jets

System #18 - Play the Under when the road team is playing their second road game in a row (Since the start of '01: O/U 50-77-5, 60.6% Unders --- O/U 24-41-3, 63.1% Unders when the road team covered the spread in the prior game). **updated**

Play the Under on: Oak/Clev, Miami/Jax

System #19a - Play the Under when the home team is favored, coming off their bye week (37-21-1, 63.8% since '98). **updated**

Play the Under on: StL/Atl

System #20 - Play on a home underdog after 4+ consecutive losses (72-42 ATS since '92). **updated**

Play on: NY Jets

System #22 - Play on a home underdog that is winless for the season (minimum 3 losses). (41-21 ATS, 66.1%). **updated**

Play on: NY Jets

System #27 - Play against a road fav off a SU win but ATS loss. (11-1 ATS since '02) (same as rule #16 except this must be a road fav) **updated**

Play on: Dallas (if Philly is favored), NY Jets

System #33 - Play against a road favorite which allows less than 4.5 yds/play (38-19, 66.7% since '92).

Play on: NY Jets

...That last one (#33) I really don't understand why this system would work. I don't know, I didn't discover it... ;) It's probably the strangest system I have in my records.

Good luck everyone!

.
.
.
.

(Just a note on the records - If it says **updated**, the record includes every game up to present. If it doesn't say that, then there may be games missing from the record for last year and early this season. In some cases a little data went missing, and it's difficult to go back and track it. The database I use can only search for certain parameters. For example, I can easily search to see if a team won after winning/losing/being at home/being a favorite/playing on a Monday/having a total under 37, etc. But the database is not programmed to do searches on records based on how many consecutive wins or losses a team had. Anyways, that explains the discrepancies.)
 
Last edited:

JEFF

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 30, 2001
2,165
0
0
Fantastic info Greg. Thanks for sharing it. Was already lening toward the Cowgirls...Jets, well, gonna have to sack up to put money on those bums.
 

spottig

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 20, 2000
88
0
0
Tempe & Louisville
I really appreciate the info & the hard work Greg...and you're right, its just one more thing to put into the equation when handicapping any game... but they sure do help:D

SPOT
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Thanks guys.

Only thing that bugs me is the records that aren't up to date. Some systems will stop working over time. I don't want to be posting anything that hasn't been productive recently. But I guess I'll weed those out as we go along.

Cheers.
 

Skanoochies

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2001
784
7
0
Canada
You the man G.M. Hope everybody at M.J.s appreciates your time and input and willingness to share.

Thank you sir,

Skanoochies.:) :) :)
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Naw, I've only got 34. I've seen Jeremy with more than 34 women in just ONE movie. (Damn fine movie, I might add :) ).
 
Last edited:

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,581
229
63
"the bunker"
looks like

looks like

the jets are gettin` alotta` love here...i can see it ....apparently,so can the books....making you lay anywhere from -125 to -140.......

i think i may have to take a look at the jets based on your angles....appreciate the info....very helpful....
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Glad you appreciate it guys. I've just gone over my initial set of picks and I am going against most of these. :lol: What am I thinking...?? Not that I didn't consider these, but after looking at the games I started to see them going the other way.

I guess I'm either going to be richer and have systems that didn't work, or I'll be poorer and have learned my lesson. :)
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
If only I had the discipline to actually play these. I go to the effort of posting them, and then I either ignore or go against half of 'em. Sheesh, what am I thinking.... :banghead: At least I was on Dallas.

No plays on System #3 (neither GB nor Dallas went off as the dog)
No plays on System #14 (total was over 37 in the Wash & Jax games, and the line dropped below +3 on NYJ)
Only one play on System #16 (Dallas not the dog)
Only one play on System #27 (Dallas not the dog)

So for the week, the record of these systems is 9-3. Not that I'd have bet the Jets 5 times...but hey, it's all good.

System #4: 0-1
System #5: 1-2
System #7: 1-0
System #8: pending play on Atlanta
System #16: 1-0
System #18: 2-0
System #19a: pending play on Under on MNF
System #20: 1-0
System #22: 1-0
System #27: 1-0
System #33: 1-0
 
Last edited:

hogman14

HBD Sports!
Forum Member
Nov 24, 2002
2,876
33
0
44
Franklin, MA
MNF

MNF

Hey GM...don't mean to overstep boundaries here...but a few more trends for tonight's matchup:

Bet on teams that have covered 3 straight, and bet on teams that have failed to cover in 3 straight.
Play = Atlanta

St. Louis team trends:
10-1 ATS as DD favs v. opp off DD loss
1-7 ATS as favs of less than 11 on MNF
1-7 ATS home on MNF
Last 6 as fav of 6+ pts, 0-5 ATS


Not much movement on the line....opened at 12, quickly went to 11, and just recently moved down the hook. Atlanta very overdue for a win...tough to lay DD's in the NFL, let alone on the MNF game...Atlanta's OL is like a sieve...public pounding the over of 45.5, which has been bet dead.

GL fellas. :cool:
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top