nhl weds

cooz3

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2002
6,026
2
0
boston
1.) boston/nj over 5..plus 110..

i'll take the over in this game at plus money....i dont care if boston had hasek in net...with defensive corps they have they are going to give up shots ...scoring chances and make mistakes in thier zone as well as the neutral zone...that being said ..i think potvin (or whoever is in net..never a good sign on opening night)..will give up a few ...i also think with a healthy samsanov the bruins offense will be harder to maintain in a trap like defense...regardless he will help the power play ..there is no doubt about that...

last season a total of 5 in the bruins game was almost a sure play for me regardless of who they were playing..of course with the nj defensive style of play there is always a chance of a very low scoring game....first few games of the season however is never the most crisp....defensive lapses happen more often ..assignments are missed..and there is no way goalies are at the top of thier game ..

with all that being said...there are a ton of reasons to play the under here...but i just dont think boston has changed enough defensively for me not to give this line a serious look...


cooz
 

cooz3

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2002
6,026
2
0
boston
2.) ducks plus 190....

this line is ridiculous...i dont care who dallas has ...the ducks beat this team last year in the playoffs ..in a 4 game series ..they certainly have a shot at winning one game ......if this line wasnt so high i probably would lay off of it....but at this price i simply cannot pass up a team who made it to the stanley cup finals ...i know how good dallas is but they lost a little defensively...again not much analysis because it really is based on the value here


cooz
 

trademaster

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,703
0
0
Vancouver BC
ducks +190 i was all happy bout stealing quacks +182:eek:

ducks are a value play for me...looks like the public is on the stars:D



GOOD LUCK COOZ:D


hmmm everyone is here today except for iconmaster:shrug:
 

cooz3

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2002
6,026
2
0
boston
3.) BLACKHAWKS ...MINUS 137 (PINNACLE)....

MINNY WITHOUT SOME WEAPONS....AND DONT FORGET CLIFF RONNING IS GONE AS WELL...HE ONLY HAD 30 POINTS LAST YEAR BUT ON THIS TEAM THATS LIKE 60 SOMEWHERE ELSE...WITHOUT THESE PLAYERS THIER OFFENSE WILL BE EVEN WORSE...AND MOST LIKEY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO FEAST ON MISTAKES BY A QUICK OFFENSIVE TRANSITION...WHAT WORRIES ME IS THAT THIS TEAM HAS BOUGHT INTO THE DEFENSIVE PHILOSOPHY...WHICH COULD BE TROUBLESOME FOR CHICAGO....IM REALLY HOPING THAT THE MISSING PIECES THAT MINNY HAS WILL HURT THIS TEAM EARLY ON UNTIL THEY ARE ABLE TO ADJUST

COOZ
 

Terryray

Say Parlay
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2001
9,629
1,656
113
Kansas City area for who knows how long....
good luck cooz

good luck cooz

if it is Potvin, over looked better after I read this at rototimes:

Felix Potvin
Bruins coach Mike Sullivan hasn't named his starting goalie for the season opener, according to the Boston Globe. Felix Potvin had a rough preseason (1-3-0-0, 5.00 GAA, .853 SV%), while Andrew Raycroft was consistent (1-1-0-0, 2.30 GAA, .931 SV%). It's possible the two could split time in net for a while, though Potvin should emerge as the regular starter eventually.
 

Spock

Vulcan Visitor
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2001
7,577
0
0
66
Canada
good luck coozer

was looking @ boston Under 2 1/2 .. but brodeur has not played well against Boston .. :eek:

Cheers !!!
Spock
 

cooz3

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2002
6,026
2
0
boston
THANKS KICK....

2-1 ...LIKE I SAID DUCKS WHERE A VALUE PLAY ONLY...AND THEY SHOWED WHY THEY WERE SUCH BIG DOGS..LOL

COOZ
 

Spock

Vulcan Visitor
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2001
7,577
0
0
66
Canada
good stuff coozer ..

I almost made a prop bet in the NJ game .. no goals in the first 11 mins @ +100 .. but stuck to the one i had capped ..

glad the over hit :D
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top