I am coming up with 42.5 thru 48 points on my calculations and that's with Kanell factored in, or Plummer factored out, however you want to look at it (half empty/half full). Here's what I am coming up with...
Calculated Numbers versus Actual Numbers
Calculated Line=New England -1.25
Actual Line=Denver -3.00
Calculated Line Range=6.28 Points
Calculated Score= New England 24.77 Denver 23.52
Calculated Total=48.29 Points, when I factor in other numbers to give the UNDER the benefit of the doubt the number I come up with is 42.5 on the nose.
Actual Total=35.5
My question is can the Total be off by that many points. Is this one of those games where they are testing bettors to look too deep into this game? When you say New England people think Defense, when you say Denver, people think Danny Kanell. I believe the OVER should be the Contrarian play tonight. And I cannot find an angle or enough trends to suggest playing the Under. And with my Total calculations being as high as they were this number, 35.5, looks very low.
I am playing OVER 35 (bought the hook)
240 to make 200
Good Luck tonight,
Mick
Calculated Numbers versus Actual Numbers
Calculated Line=New England -1.25
Actual Line=Denver -3.00
Calculated Line Range=6.28 Points
Calculated Score= New England 24.77 Denver 23.52
Calculated Total=48.29 Points, when I factor in other numbers to give the UNDER the benefit of the doubt the number I come up with is 42.5 on the nose.
Actual Total=35.5
My question is can the Total be off by that many points. Is this one of those games where they are testing bettors to look too deep into this game? When you say New England people think Defense, when you say Denver, people think Danny Kanell. I believe the OVER should be the Contrarian play tonight. And I cannot find an angle or enough trends to suggest playing the Under. And with my Total calculations being as high as they were this number, 35.5, looks very low.
I am playing OVER 35 (bought the hook)
240 to make 200
Good Luck tonight,
Mick