Week 16 System Plays

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
The plays went 11-6 last week.

Going into this week...a word of caution about teams who have given up on their seasons. My theory is that teams that are out of it and on the road may not perform as well as they normally would, whereas teams with nothing to play for but at home may at least give an honest effort in front of the home fans.

Also I'd expect teams that have just been eliminated from contention to come up lame the most often. A team that had their playoff dreams end last week, in my recollection, tends to stink it up immediately after. However, if a team has been out of the running for weeks the "mourning period" is over, and they may actually start to improve, playing for jobs next year or just for pride. Again, just my theories, but I always try to keep these things in mind this time of year, and I've done alright by it.

On to this week's plays....

Two teams come up three times: the NY Jets and Houston. Personally, I cannot play Houston as long as their injury situation is what it is. Their offence has been virtually non-existent the past two weeks. I really see them struggling to score any more than 7 points against anybody at this point.

A couple other teams come up twice: Cleveland and Cincinnati.

And we have a pretty unusual situation come up this week not once, but twice, on System #36.

Here we go....

=============================================

System #3 - Play on a home dog if they won their last game outright, and their opponent was at home last week (90-44-6, 67.2% since '90).

Play on: NY Jets

System #5 - Play on the home team when both teams have won 2 straight SU (74-47-2, 61.2% since '89).

Play on: Indianapolis

System #9 - Play on the home dog on Monday Night football (58-36, 61.7% since '83).

Play on: Oakland

System #14 - Play on any home dog of 3 pts if the total is 37 or less (31-19, 62.7% since 1983).

Play on: NY Jets, Cleveland (as long as line stays at +3, and total stays at or below 37)

System #16 - Play against a team that won but failed to cover last week, and is favored again this week. (29-5, 85.3% since start of '02, including 15-4, 78.9% when the team in question was favored on the road). **updated**

Play on: Cincinnati, Detroit, Houston

System #18 - Play the Under when the road team is playing their second road game in a row (Since the start of '01: O/U 67-102-5, 60.4% Unders --- O/U 32-52-3, 61.9% Unders when the road team covered the spread in the prior game). **updated**

Play the Under on the games involving: Atlanta, Baltimore, Detroit, NY Giants, San Francisco, Green Bay

System #20 - Play on a home underdog after 4+ consecutive losses (77-45-1 ATS, 63.1% since '92). **updated**

Play on: Cleveland

System #21 - Play against a road favorite on a 4+ game win streak. (51-32 ATS, 61.4% since '92). **updated**

Play on: NY Jets

System #27 - Play against a road fav off a SU win but ATS loss. (15-2 ATS, 88.2% since '02) (same as System #16 except this must be a road fav) **updated**

Play on: Houston

System #31 - Play on home dogs of 7 pts or less who allow 4.5 yds/play or less. (14-5-1 ATS, 73.6% since '92) **updated**

Play on: Buffalo (if they become the dog)

System #35 - Play on any team that has scored fewer than 30 pts in it's past three games.

Play on: NY Giants, Houston
Note: The Giants have repeatedly qualified for this system or come close to qualifying for it, and have repeatedly failed to cover. Also see notes regarding Houston above.

System #36 - Play against any team that has scored more than 90 pts in it's past three games.

Play on: Minnesota, Cincinnati, Denver**
Note: Two more teams - San Fran & Philly - qualify for this system, but they play against each other, so obviously they cancel each other out.

On top of that, Denver has scored exactly 90 points in the past 3 weeks, while Indianapolis has scored 101 points. So, if you want to get super-technical about it, since the rule states "more than 90" points must be scored, Denver is a play (a play-against on Indy), but Indy is not. However, it could probably be argued they also cancel each other out here.


Good luck.
 
Last edited:

hogman14

HBD Sports!
Forum Member
Nov 24, 2002
2,876
33
0
44
Franklin, MA
Thanks GM!

I have a file w/a ton of these, and most of them are these numbered systems, but obviously not as updated, some of them are a little too general for me, but many help the trend player. They are at least something to consider. Appreciate the hard work week in and week out w/these posts!

:hail :hail :hail

GL
 

Superbear

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 23, 2002
696
1
0
61
New England
Play On - All teams where the line is +3 to -3 (CLEVELAND) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record in the second half of the season. (28-8 over the last 10 seasons.) (77.8%, +19.2 units. Rating = 3*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (29-11 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Opponent favored by 1.3
The average score in these games was: Team 24, Opponent 19.2 (Average point differential = +4.8)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 17 (43.6% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-1).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (8-2).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (14-2).
Since 1983 the situation's record is: (42-24).

Play Against - Favorites of 3.5 to 10 points (CHICAGO) - after having won 2 out of their last 3 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (45-14 since 1983.) (76.3%, +29.6 units. Rating = 4*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (25-34)
The average line posted in these games was: Opponent favored by 6.1
The average score in these games was: Team 19.1, Opponent 21 (Average point differential = -1.9)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 21 (36.8% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-1).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (3-1).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (7-7).
Over the last 10 seasons the situation's record is: (22-9).

Play Against - Favorites of 3.5 to 10 points (CHICAGO) - after having won 2 out of their last 3 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team in the second half of the season. (32-11 since 1983.) (74.4%, +19.9 units. Rating = 3*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (19-24)
The average line posted in these games was: Opponent favored by 6
The average score in these games was: Team 19, Opponent 21.2 (Average point differential = -2.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 15 (36.6% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-1).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (2-1).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (5-6).
Over the last 10 seasons the situation's record is: (14-7).

Play Against - Home favorites of 3.5 to 10 points (CHICAGO) - after having won 2 out of their last 3 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (34-11 since 1983.) (75.6%, +21.9 units. Rating = 3*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (17-28)
The average line posted in these games was: Opponent favored by 6.4
The average score in these games was: Team 19.5, Opponent 21.6 (Average point differential = -2.1)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 13 (30.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-1).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (2-1).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (5-7).
Over the last 10 seasons the situation's record is: (19-8).

Play On - Home teams where the line is +3 to -3 (JACKSONVILLE) - good team (outgain opp. by 0.4 to 1 YPP) against an average team (+/- 0.4 YPP) after 8+ games. (36-12 since 1983.) (75%, +22.8 units. Rating = 3*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (39-12)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 1.4
The average score in these games was: Team 23.2, Opponent 15.6 (Average point differential = +7.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 21 (42% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-1).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (5-1).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (9-2).
Over the last 10 seasons the situation's record is: (17-4).



69% - 74%
(2003 regular season 44-48-1)

Play Against - Road favorites (BALTIMORE) - with a good passing D - allowing 5.5 or less passing yards/attempt, after allowing 5.5 or less passing yards per attempt last game. (57-21 over the last 10 seasons.) (73.1%, +33.9 units. Rating = 4*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (40-42 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Opponent favored by 5.4
The average score in these games was: Team 20.1, Opponent 21.6 (Average point differential = -1.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 32 (39.5% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-3).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (14-7).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (26-11).
Since 1983 the situation's record is: (87-52).

Play Against - Road teams where the line is +3 to -3 (BALTIMORE) - off 1 or more consecutive unders, a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 8 or more games. (48-21 since 1983.) (69.6%, +24.9 units. Rating = 3*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (50-22)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 0.2
The average score in these games was: Team 22.6, Opponent 18.1 (Average point differential = +4.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 29 (40.8% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-1).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (8-2).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (16-3).
Over the last 10 seasons the situation's record is: (26-8).

Play On - Any team (CLEVELAND) - after 4 consecutive games where they forced 1 or less turnovers. (58-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.6%, +32.7 units. Rating = 3*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (51-32 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Opponent favored by 2.2
The average score in these games was: Team 22.3, Opponent 19.8 (Average point differential = +2.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 32 (40% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (12-5).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (30-10).
Over the last 10 seasons the situation's record is: (101-69).
Since 1983 the situation's record is: (149-107).

Play Against - Favorites of 3.5 to 10 points (CHICAGO) - after having won 2 out of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (50-20 since 1983.) (71.4%, +28 units. Rating = 3*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (28-42)
The average line posted in these games was: Opponent favored by 5.9
The average score in these games was: Team 18.4, Opponent 21.3 (Average point differential = -2.8)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 24 (35.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-1).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (3-3).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (8-10).
Over the last 10 seasons the situation's record is: (25-12).

Play Against - Favorites of 3.5 to 10 points (CHICAGO) - after having won 2 out of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% in the second half of the season. (36-13 since 1983.) (73.5%, +21.7 units. Rating = 3*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (21-28)
The average line posted in these games was: Opponent favored by 5.8
The average score in these games was: Team 18.7, Opponent 20.9 (Average point differential = -2.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 17 (36.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-1).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (2-1).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (5-7).
Over the last 10 seasons the situation's record is: (16-8).

Play On - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 10 points (CINCINNATI) - after scoring and allowing 30 pts or more last game.
(32-12 over the last 10 seasons.) (72.7%, +18.8 units. Rating = 3*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (17-28 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Opponent favored by 6.1
The average score in these games was: Team 20.7, Opponent 24 (Average point differential = -3.3)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 15 (33.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-2).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (11-7).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (18-7).
Since 1983 the situation's record is: (50-32).
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Week 16's been pretty much the opposite of Week 15 .... much more of a dog week.

2002: 8 Favs, 8 Dogs. 5 Overs, 11 Unders.
2001: 4 Favs, 10 Dogs, 1 Push. 8 Overs, 6 Unders, 1 Push.
2000: 5 Favs, 10 Dogs. 4 Overs, 11 Unders.
1999: 6 Favs, 8 Dogs, 1 Push. 9 Overs, 5 Unders, 1 Push.

61% Dogs, 55.9% Unders

Home dogs are 17-5-1 (77.3%) in Week 16 over the past 4 years.
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top