thursday ncaa basketball plays.......

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
========================================
virginia (+16.5) over georgia tech
========================================
georgia tech has come down to earth a little bit. i think they were starting to buy into their own hype a little bit. theyre vastly improved, but i still think the georgia tech and st.joes are still two of the most overrated teams in the top 25. (them aint fightin words meant to stir up loyal joes or tech backers, its just my opinion). i know tech has been lights out at home this year and perhaps the common perception is that theyll bury virginia since theyre coming off 2 losses in a row. but i dont see it. i think its awfully tough to lay a ton of pts with a team thats coming off two poor defensive performances in a row. gotta make a commitment to defense if they want to be an elite acc team. i know 'acc defense' is an oxymoron, but still think tech lacks the defense to cover these high #s now that conference play is here. techs opponents have outshot them at the line 80-47 the L2 gms. certainly not making virginia out to be a gem, but they do have enough talent to hang in this one. they score enough points where i think tech will have trouble pulling away. i think were looking at a 10 or 11 pt tech win. jackets with maryland and wake on deck.
============================================
pepperdine (+3.5) over santa clara
pepperdine (+150) over santa clara
============================================
pepperdine has owned this series (winning 8 of the last 10 straight up). not trying to talk outta both sides of my mouth (cracking on tech for their recent defense and then playing a "whats-defense?- never-heard-of-it" waves team). but i think pepperdine is just the superior team and i dont think santa clara has anyone to stop mcgowan. broncos have been a nemesis for me this season. maybe theyll screw me again, but ill take my chances. waves have a real chance to play themselves back into the wcc race before their rematch with gonzaga. after this one, they go to san diego (winnable) and then have a 3 gm homestand before their zags rematch. santa clara loves to play games down to the final minute. pepperdine actually better fundamentally than one would think. good FT shooting team and they turn the ball over very infrequently - a bit surprising given the fact they play at a breakneck pace. only 24 turnovers their L3 gms. waves might be turning the corner a little bit.


not playing these as of yet, but lean to:

washington (im a sucker for this team as a dog. i like that conroy kid. huskies turn the ball over too much though- and oregon is a team that can go on sustained runs to knock tms out)

southern cal (i dont think usc is as bad as some make em out to be. but trojans could get hurt on the glass here. thats my hesitation. not particularly worried about "zona off a loss will be out for blood". trojans talented enough to hang, but hate the way they rebound)

butler (if i played these clowns, it would be strictly a line play. lost 5 in a row and 7 of 8 and laying 8.5? siena covered a big number in a similar spot 2 nights ago). fundamentally, butler has failed in a handful of situations this year. worth noting that these are two extremely contrasting styles. loyola wants to play in the 90s, butler in the 50s. if bulldogs didnt suck so bad right now, id say their discipline would pick loyola apart all night long)

detroit (detroit simply a tougher team. uic the class of the conference but detroit at essentially a pick 'em at callahan is tough to pass up. only hesitation is titans have been inexplicably shaky at home lately, which is unheard of considering their home court edge is as good as any team in the entire country)
 
Last edited:

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
you know ive been reading your book on 'betting exclusively dogs'. but that number in the butler game is fu/ckin stupid. honestly, i DONT like them in that game. if they were layin 3 or 4, i wouldnt even give it a passing thought. but that line says to play 'em. i think you know what im alluding to. theyre 4-9. lost 5 in a row and 7 of 8. but theyre laying 8.5. :confused: loyola has been on the wrong end of some ass-whooping at finkle, albeit vs better butler teams.

(if i did back em, it would probably be a 1h play. if theyre gonna lay it on em, itll be early. theyre not good enough this year to make their 2nd half "pull away" runs)
 
Last edited:

Sun Tzu

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 10, 2003
6,197
9
0
Houston, Texas
I certainly agree about the line. If the line is too good to be true it probably is. reason I pulled the trigger on another rare fav tonight in OSU
 

The Big Tease

DUKE SUCKS
Forum Member
Mar 9, 2000
2,788
1
0
46
Columbus,OH USA
gman....you read my mind on virginia. That line is insane......I am starting to realize that this is the part of the year to really cash in.....if you can separate the contenders from the pretenders.

I think Georgia Tech is a pretty good team......but the lines they are getting are UCONN and Duke-like.....this team is the 3rd or 4th or maybe even 5th best team in the ACC when all is said and done......

Virginia is game enough to keep this one close
 

vinnie

la vita ? buona
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2000
59,163
212
0
Here
Glad to see you on Virginia :D nice run keep it going. How you doing so far this year ? I see you don't have units played any more does that mean there all one unit ?
GL2U
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
vinnie:

hit a cold spell that bridged the new year. not as consistent as i was during college football. too much hot/cold fluctuation. yeah- for now everythings a unit unless its overtly stated otherwise. ;)
 

TJBELL

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 22, 2001
14,651
6
0
66
Port Richey, Florida
Maximum Wager: 3000.00 USD 2000.00 USD 2000.00 USD
Thu 1/15 513 Virginia +16 -103 +1264 :eek: :eek: OVER 155 -108
04:00 PM 514 Georgia Tech -16 -107 -1824 UNDER 155 -108


Virginia will probably not win, but that ML would be sweet!

Good luck G!
 

SANKS

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 24, 2003
513
0
0
Ohio
I live in Atlanta and i have been to many of the georgia tech games this year and i always see one trend, even against mediocre teams i always see them get up by around 10 points early in the first half but always seem to struggle in the last few minutes of the first half so it is close at halftime and they end up blowing the team out in the 2nd half by 20-25 points so ill take the 9 points in the first half hoping this trend continues.
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
virginia players probably betting on themselves. line down to 14
 

johnnyb.

Authentic
Forum Member
Mar 3, 2002
3,814
92
48
O.C.
www.johnnybhaircarecom
whats crackin friend???
alot of west coast hoops today, friend of mine all over csun tonite... did you take a look at that one? matadors playing good ball lately. good luck with your plays!
 

the_fix_is_on

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 23, 2002
901
0
0
Western Maryland
Gman,
GT gave UVA every chance in the world to get back in the game, only UVA coudn't throw the ball in the ocean. . . from the field or from the charity stripe. UVA hit their first 6 out 7 three's. I don't think they hit another one for the rest of the game. :shrug:

Tough loss. I thought 16 was way too many point too. That's what I get for thinking. :mad:
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
fix:

yep- win some of those kinds of gms, lose some of those kinds of gms. like you said, uva had plenty of chances. not gonna sweat that one too much. conversely, had virginia snuck inside the number- i wouldnt have felt like a capping genius for winning. game coulda gone either way. a true coin flip.
 

ChuckyTheGoat

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 18, 2000
2,868
6
0
Sun Tzu wrote handicapping books? Back in 500 BC? The NY Times Bestseller "Art of War" was the only Sun Tzu work with which I was familiar.
 

fatback

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 23, 2002
661
7
18
G, was it you, I think last year, that said to be leary of away favorites that are 3 points or less because those teams are good enough to be favorites but are not good enough to overcome a road game?

I'm trying to remember because If it is true I want to start tracking the win/lose percentages of the home team.
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
chucky:
lol, good to see you around these parts. yeah, i think ST might have authored both war and capping books.

fatback:
your memory serves semi-correct; however, it was actually home favorites of 2 or less. the road team is often the superior team in that kind of spot and the small 1, 1.5, or 2 point chalk is just there for a perceived home court advantage- and the chalk in that spot is often a faux favorite imo. for awhile, i made good money betting dogs in that spot. i cant say ive been tracking the #s lately.


sidenote:

looks like i should have played all my leans instead . unbelievable. every single one of those cashed. :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top