He is another fine example of why the Bush administration has lost my vote for 04. I just dont get it, why is it that anytime anyone disagree's with anyone in the Bush administration they are called out as either being a "terrorist group" or "unpatriotic", what has become of the main issue that our forefathers fought for freedom of speech? What is wrong with a disagreement on any issue, through disagreement we are able to alter ideas and see the other side and hopefully meet in a middle ground that leads to a productive soloution. When GW ran I really bought his line that he was a Uniter and not a divider, but in my brief lifetime I have never seen a administration that is som committed to partisan lines.
