Effort to dump income tax gains steam

Turfgrass

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 26, 2002
1,153
5
0
Raleigh
Please Read.....

Here is the link

By Ron Strom
? 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

An effort to do away with federal income tax and replace it with a national consumption tax is gaining steam, as activists strive to get at least 100 members of the House of Representatives on board by Independence Day.

"We think we'll be at 100 co-sponsors by July 4," Tom Wright, executive director of Americans for Fair Taxation, told WND.

Wright noted the House bill, H.R. 25, added its latest co-sponsor this week ? Republican Rep. Barbara Cubin of Wyoming ? bringing the total to 44.

"We're working with our grass-roots people across the country" to get to the goal, Wright said. H.R. 25, the Fair Tax Act, is sponsored by Rep. John Linder, R-Ga., who has sponsored similar legislation for the last several years. The latest version of the bill was introduced Jan. 7, 2003.

"The current federal income tax system is broken. Patching up the existing code is pointless. It's time for a fresh approach, a fair approach. It's time for the FairTax," says the group's website.

"From its humble beginnings, the income tax has grown like a cancer by taxing our hard work and discouraging savings and investment."

H.R. 25 would eliminate the federal income tax and replace it with a 23 percent consumption tax paid by the end user. That means business-to-business purchases for the production of goods and services would not be taxed. The organization estimates consumer prices will drop by an estimated 20-30 percent as a result of the change.

The group's website describes how the bill's rebate function works. It assures that those living in poverty would not pay any tax.

"Under the FairTax, no American will pay taxes on necessities. The rebate will be equivalent to the tax paid on essential goods and services. The rebate will be mailed before the tax is actually paid [and] will be paid in equal installments at the beginning of the month. The size of the monthly rebate will be determined by the federal poverty level for a particular household size."

Wright touted the support of the American Farm Bureau. The organization has been educating its membership on the bill, and many state chapters have given the bill legislative priority.

Dumping the income tax has become a campaign issue in many political races this year, Wright says.

"All over Texas, House candidates are supporting it," he said, mentioning races in other states as well.

Wright noted the bill's cause is helped every time Social Security reform is discussed, since, under the plan, the entitlement program would be supported by the consumption tax instead of what he calls the "regressive" Social Security tax.

Americans for Fair Taxation says the first year the plan goes into effect, revenue to the federal government would remain the same. From there, the group claims, revenue will grow due to increased economic activity.

H.R. 25 is pending in the House Ways and Means Committee and has not had a hearing. Once the sponsorship level grows to 100, however, Wright thinks Chairman Bill Thomas, R-Calif., will take action on the bill.

The bill's Senate version is S.1493, sponsored by Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., which was introduced in July.

WND columnist Neal Boortz is a supporter of the plan. In an August column, he addressed the issue of why the idea hasn't been enacted already.

"And just why hasn't it passed?" he wrote. "Because the idea is so bold that many politicians, while personally praising the concept, just assume it can't pass.

"It can pass, my friends. It can pass if the people of America learn the details and then let their elected officials know that they want some action."
 

Marco

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 29, 2003
793
0
0
Surprised no one here has replied to this yet.....

Looked at it some and mulled over it a bit....some of my own thoughts:

1.....just so long as, like they say, create this consumption tax and not hang on to the income tax in some form or another....

2.....have to watch cheating closely......there are already those out there who hold back tax payments.....more incentive to hold back when you can pocket 23%.....awful tempting to sell a $1000 item, keep it off the books, and pocket the $230 the buyer paid as tax.....providing a SERVICE even more tempting as then there is less physical evidence.....or essensially, a plumber would get away with it easier than a car dealer or someone with more inventoried goods....

3.....cheats buying more foreign and trying to skip the import tax.......

4.....eliminate all the tax shelter scams that accounting firms dream up to save big business all those billions? Am I missing something here?

5.....being that this is mainly and largely a gambling forum.....then gamblers who gain income by gambling would only by pursued by the moralistic zealots and not prosecuted for not paying an income tax that has now been aborted? How does the gambling issue fall into the "end user" scheme of things?

6.....people that bitch about working overtime only to see the government take most of it now get all of it? Let me work 20 hours one week, then 60 the next week with overtime after 40...

7.....still trying to determine how I'd fare under this new proposal, right now I'm thinking I'd like it.....
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top