What about Wisconsin?
What about Wisconsin?
Win the Big 10 tourney - ranked #10 in the polls, #16 in RPI, winners of their last 5 games (all on the road or neutral floors) ..
<B>and get a #6 seed????</B>
Illinois - #13 in the polls, #21 in RPI - and lose 2 out of 3 to Wisconsin - and both blowouts - and they get a #5 seed???
<B>How in the world can anyone justify Illinois having a better seed than Wisconsin???? </B> The game yesterday backed up what the RPI already showed prior to the game..... Is the committee just plain stupid?
If the Big 10 championship doesn't play a role in seeding, why even play it? Why take the chance of an important player for either team getting hurt in a meaningless game????
Yes, Pitt could have had a #2 seed potentially - instead of a #3...
But you could argue, fairly easily, that Wisconsin was deserving of a #3 - #4 seed.... yes, the Big 10 had a down year - but that is factored into the RPI ranking... heck, they were 24-6!
Instead of looking at playing #3 Pitt in the 2nd round, they should be playing a #5 in the second round - a huge difference, even if folks think they are playing at "home"....