F 9/11

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Republican network FOX has no shame. Has little if any good to say about 9/11. But was advertising it last few days. Took that money to the bank.
9/11 does tell a story about a rush to no where before completing our first job.
I think we better get to Sudan fast. Rumor there hiding Saddam WMD's there. And since we went to Iraq to save the people. Lets see they think about 45000 were killed due to Saddam. Well in Sudan another killing dictator. Estimates 85000 maybe more. And not back 12/15 years ago. In last 3 years.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
DOGS THAT BARK said:
Only sure thing that has been obvious is conservatives have been adamantly questioning it--the liberals-aljazeera and yesterday Hezalah (spl) climb aboard with their endorsement.Now,what can one draw from that conclusion?
P.S. I would not be surprised to see Saddam throw in an endorsment either as his analysis of Bush and Coalition pretty much mirrored the above. :)

Well of course the Arab press is endorsing it. And if DJV is correct, FOX is taking ad money for it. Not sure what the point is. Have you seen it, DTB?

If at all possible(doubtful, but you never know), i'd be interested in even one of our friendly pro Iraqi war neo-cons (chicken hawks?) to give some thoughts about it, dispute some of the points or even just admit that they have seen it. There hasn't been any of that in this, or any other, thread.

We have a book review from a year ago and an 8,000 word article that was posted here last week that tries very little to dispute much in the movie.

I have a lot of thoughts on it, but I don't feel like talking to myself.
 

Chanman

:-?PipeSmokin'
Forum Member
Kosar, just because someone questions your rationale does not mean they are accountable to you on your terms. You raise excellent points, but personally I beg to differ and try to use information available to back up my reasoning. I know some will have that 'Bunker Mentality' in that they refuse to listen to opposing views and frankly so be it. I'm not out to challenge or belittle anyone- just asking questions that I have. I like this board and would banish myself if I started to offend some, even if I thought I was in the right.

All I'm saying is that WE got upset, and rightly so, @ Hellah10's accusations against our Govt. But ppl like Moore believe, or panders to those that do, that Bush lied to the American ppl and started a war over oil and/or revenge for his father- (Saddam's Assasination attempt). Hmmm, Seems racial dontcha think?

Even you supported the military action in Afghanistan. What sorta Chicken Hawk is that? Remember when we defeated saddam the first time... and then years later everyone was up in arms as to why we didn't take him out at that time. Easy to criticize after the fact.

I'll watch F 9/11 when its on cable, but I don't want to spend $ on it anymore than you would watch this
MMHAPosterforWeb2.jpg


In the meantime I think its interesting that reviews such as this one come out:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5335853/site/newsweek/site/newsweek/

Lets see a few months ago the public was dumbed down, REAL TV watching morons who followed NASCAR & drank beer, etc., etc. (I think this desciption comes close). Now they are enlightened masses ready to take back the WhiteHouse.

Well its only gonna get worse and if Kerry/Billiary win- more power to them & you. Guess we'll be the ones kicking off and you'll be receiving. :thumb:
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
Channie:

Speaking for myself, if the majority of the American electorate votes for Kerry (as they did for Gore), I will not change my opinion that the majority of Americans are dumber than a box of rocks. To me, who wins this election, or any election for that matter, is generally based upon who has the larger coffer and who gives a better perception.

Substance means little or nothing any more. My point here is that despite our conservative friends endless mantra about the liberal media, that is just plain out and out spin. Moore and Franken represents a different perspective on Bush. That is refreshing.

Considering the uproar this movie has caused with the conservatives, my only take on it is that maybe its hitting a little close to home. If its all lies and Moore self-promotion, then I'm sure the truth will come out. Right?

The bottom line is that Bush will win in November. Even if he retains Mr. Evil as vp. He has the money and the backing of the money. That coupled with a moronic American electorate = Bush/Cheney win. Again, God help this country.

With that said, it still amazes me how Bush can get re-elected after his entire basis for invading another country and directly and indirectly causing the deaths of some 20,000 people has been proven to be false. If Clinton took the same actions as Bush, with a republican legislature, I have no doubt that he would have been impeached (again).

Eddie
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
Chanman said:
All I'm saying is that WE got upset, and rightly so, @ Hellah10's accusations against our Govt. But ppl like Moore believe, or panders to those that do, that Bush lied to the American ppl and started a war over oil and/or revenge for his father- (Saddam's Assasination attempt). Hmmm, Seems racial dontcha think?

Even you supported the military action in Afghanistan. What sorta Chicken Hawk is that? Remember when we defeated saddam the first time... and then years later everyone was up in arms as to why we didn't take him out at that time. Easy to criticize after the fact.

I'll watch F 9/11 when its on cable, but I don't want to spend $ on it anymore than you would watch this- (Moore hates America)

In the meantime I think its interesting that reviews such as this one come out:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5335853/site/newsweek/site/newsweek/

Lets see a few months ago the public was dumbed down, REAL TV watching morons who followed NASCAR & drank beer, etc., etc. (I think this desciption comes close). Now they are enlightened masses ready to take back the WhiteHouse.

Well its only gonna get worse and if Kerry/Billiary win- more power to them & you. Guess we'll be the ones kicking off and you'll be receiving. :thumb:


I don't think Hellahs comments bear any resemblance to the notion that, for whatever reasons, this admin led us into an unjust, unwise war at the exact same time that every last bit of our money and our men were needed to go after Al-queda.

Please explain how it's a racial thing. Hellah, who happens to be arab, blamed our government and Israel for being directly involved in 9/11.

Moore, who is white, thinks there were other motives besides those given publically to invade Iraq. There is some reason that people agree with that, apparently, as about half the country agrees with him. There's a pretty big difference between the two ways of thinking. I can't really see the racial connection.

Of course I supported attacking Afghanistan. I don't really get your point on that one.

We didn't take Saddam out at that time because Dubyas dad had a lot more sense than this admin. Even with a million+ troops over there and a broad, ACTUAL coalition, Bush 1 recognized that this would not be best for our country. He predicited very accurately the pitfalls of occupying that country. I posted his quote a few months ago. You might remember it.

Sure, i'll watch 'Moore Hates America.' Is that going to be in theaters, or if not, how do you get ahold of it? Hopefully it will address some of Moores more cogent points. While they aren't all valid, many of them have been on a lot of peoples minds for a long time. It's not so much that Moore lays out any, or many, new thoughts, but he's basically just made a vehicle to display, and try to thread together, what a lot of people were already thinking.

I'm not trying to get anybody to post 'on my terms', but I am curious if any of the people who have been bashing the film, or have been bashing Moore, have actually seen it. So far, that's a 'no'.

That review you linked is long, and I only skimmed it. But obviously those reviewers didn't agree with the movie. I could post 100 that agree with it, at least in part. I could post articles that support much of what Moore suggests. It just doesn't matter, though.

You mentioned that you like to go with information at hand, yet the only information in *your* hand seems to always be slanted in one direction. What you may call information, I might call propaganda, and vice versa. But please don't pull the old 'Can't teach old Dogs That Barks new' trick in talking about needing 'facts' and then attempting to buttress them with some sort of slanted article from God knows where.

Where you guys prefer cutting and pasting articles and you seemingly aren't really that interested in interpreting those 'facts', I would prefer to see the views of Chanman, or even Dr. Freeze, rather than George Will. Or better yet, a discussion of a piece by Will, or whoever. But it seems that a lot of people are content to throw up an article and then go back in their hole(Turfgrass comes to mind, but there are plenty), as if that's the last word.

I have no idea what that bit about Nascar and all that is all about.

You mention 'more power to you' if Hillary runs with Kerry. I'm pretty sure that just today I said i'd be very scared if she becomes Pres or VP.

:)
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top