The way this game started I dont think the 2nd half 0/u can be put high enough. 35pts scored and the 1st quarter isnt even over yet. 
GB Shootout
- Thread starter bubbas1
- Start date
if this game were to stay under the total (yeah, RIGHT!!!!).....i expect to see EVERYONE that was on the over post the name of the person or object that they KILLED in YYZ's thread in general discussion "how angry have you ever gotten over a loss"
Theboundbook said:
You KNOW Manning is going to be let loose to break the record of 7 td passes, and the Packers aren't going to "quit".
I like the over if it is under 24
was just about to post the same thing YYZ..... went to look at the total first, while thinking liking the over at 27.5 and down...
first line of thinking was RIGHT with you... Manning WILL go for the record, and second line of thinking is sort of with you
agree, Favre will NOT lie down, as long as it stays close, he may not get too wild, and they may be the ones helping put that total over... if it does get too far apart, Farve will start throwing things up for grabs, and we may see some Indy defensive TD's too.
first line of thinking was RIGHT with you... Manning WILL go for the record, and second line of thinking is sort of with you
agree, Favre will NOT lie down, as long as it stays close, he may not get too wild, and they may be the ones helping put that total over... if it does get too far apart, Farve will start throwing things up for grabs, and we may see some Indy defensive TD's too.
When a half "giggles", over or under in the first generally the opposite happens in the second half. I think it was Nolan Dalla that pointed this out to me a couple of years ago in a thread of his. And over time this has been one of the best tools for me in second half wins.
I still would have figured this game to be the exception to the rule.
I would assume that with two shit defenses, the scoring would have contined. IMO, the only coin flip was would GB score first? Well, they did, and I thought Manning would come right back. They did not. Indy played a far more lack luster game than anyone would have thought in that second half.
Another reason why I consider the NFL to be an "unbeatable" sport to wager on.
I would assume that with two shit defenses, the scoring would have contined. IMO, the only coin flip was would GB score first? Well, they did, and I thought Manning would come right back. They did not. Indy played a far more lack luster game than anyone would have thought in that second half.
Another reason why I consider the NFL to be an "unbeatable" sport to wager on.
