KOSAR,CLEM,KDogg and all other liberals....enjoy!!

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
My source is U.S. DEFENSE OFFICIALS FROM THE PENTAGON----

To Kosar and Clem and KDogg and all you other brainwashed pussy liberal dickheads who tried to attack me yesterday on the Al-Qaqaa missing weapons issue............I present to you.....SOLID EVIDENCE THAT YOU CANNOT DISPUTE!!!!!!!....like I ALWAYS DO! :yup

:thefinger

PENTAGON SATELLITE IMAGES OF TRUCKS MOVING MASS AMOUNTS OF WEAPONS OUT OF AL-QAA-QA........2 DAYS PRIOR TO THE INVASION!!!!

The Russian Special Forces team that assisted them was housed at a computer center near the Russian Embassy in Baghdad!! They flew the weapons out of Baghdad Intl' Airport right before we got there!!!!!!!!!!! I DARE ONE PERSON TO DISPUTE THIS. :brows:

Again liberals of Madjacks.....thank you for allowing me to teach you yet another valuable lesson!!! DON'T MESS WITH MANSON!!!

:nutkick

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20041028-115519-3700r.htm
 
Last edited:

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
And BTW if you say that after those images were shot, we shouldn't have waited 2 days to invade................

remember your candidate and your whole pathetic Democratic party said that we "jumped the gun on invading Iraq" :grins:
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,716
290
83
53
Belly of the Beast
TV Video May Show Explosives at Al-Qaqaa

54 minutes ago Middle East - AP



WASHINGTON - Videotape shot by a Minnesota television crew traveling with U.S. troops in Iraq (news - web sites) when they first opened the bunkers at the Al-Qaqaa munitions base nine days after the fall of Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) shows what appeared to be high explosives still in barrels and bearing the markings of the International Atomic Energy Agency.


AP Photo




Latest headlines:
? Kerry Campaign Seizes on Halliburton Probe
AP - 3 minutes ago
? Britain pledges to 'seriously' study report of 100,000 Iraqi deaths
AFP - 8 minutes ago
? Iraqi killed as car bombs target US military patrols in Mosul
AFP - 8 minutes ago
Special Coverage





The video taken by KSTP of St. Paul on April 18, 2003, could reinforce suggestions that tons of explosives missing from a munitions installation in Iraq were looted after the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq. The video was broadcast nationally Thursday on ABC.


"The photographs are consistent with what I know of Al-Qaqaa," David A. Kay, a former American official who directed the hunt in Iraq for unconventional weapons and visited the site, told The New York Times. "The damning thing is the seals. The Iraqis didn't use seals on anything. So I'm absolutely sure that's an IAEA seal."


The question of what happened to the tons of explosives has become a major issue in the closing days of the presidential campaign.


Democrat John Kerry (news - web sites) says the missing explosives ? powerful enough to demolish a building, bring down a jetliner or set off a nuclear weapon ? are another example of the Bush administration's poor planning and incompetence in handling the war in Iraq. President Bush (news - web sites) says the explosives were possibly removed by Saddam's forces before the invasion.


Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld entered the debate Thursday, suggesting the 377 tons of explosives were taken away before U.S. forces arrived, saying any large effort to loot the material afterward would have been detected.


"We would have seen anything like that," he said in one of two radio interviews he gave at the Pentagon (news - web sites). "The idea it was suddenly looted and moved out, all of these tons of equipment, I think is at least debatable."


The Pentagon also declassified and released a single image, taken by reconnaissance aircraft or satellite just days before the war, showing two trucks outside one of the dozens of storage bunkers at the Al-Qaqaa munitions base.


The particular bunker is not one known to have contained any of the missing explosives, and Pentagon spokesman Larry Di Rita said the image only shows that there was some Iraqi activity at the base when it was taken, on March 17. Di Rita said the image says nothing about what happened to the explosives.


Rumsfeld, in one radio interview, also cast doubt on the suggestion of one of his subordinates that Russian forces assisted the Iraqis in removing them.


John Shaw, the deputy U.S. undersecretary of defense for international technology security, suggested to The Washington Times in an interview that the Russians may have been involved, prompting an angry denial from Moscow.


Rumsfeld said, "I have no information on that at all, and cannot validate that even slightly."


But at issue is whether the weapons were moved before or after U.S. forces occupied that region of the country in early April. No one has been able to provide conclusive evidence either way, although Iraqi officials blamed it on poor U.S. security after Baghdad fell.


The Pentagon has said it's looking into the matter, and officials note that 400,000 tons of recovered Iraqi munitions have either been destroyed or are slated to be destroyed.
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,716
290
83
53
Belly of the Beast
Proving his ?facts? (sic) wrong is turning into a little hobby of mine, djv, but I doubt it will shut him up.

Very comforting that a camera crew from a third-rate Minneapolis news station has better information on the existence/non-existence of weapons than the Pentagon.
 

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
You obviously just missed the Pentagon News conference!!...ouch!!

:clap: Bobby if deiscreditting "my" facts is a new hobby for you I suggest you take up windsurfing or hunting instead.....you never have once proved me wrong!

How are my facts wrong? Any way you can be specific instead of just trying to pat yourself on the back for no reason?

You want to say the Pentagon Satellite photos are FAKE? Let's start with that one ok???

I just watched the Pentagon Press conference with my own eyes and the Military major in charge stood up in front of America and said that his troops removed about 250 tons of the explosives out. The remainder was most likely removed on that day 2 days prior to the invasion (The day the Pentagon shot images of large trucks removing items from the site.)

DJV, no he most certainly didn't shut me up!!! He needs to get his facts straight!!!

You spoke too soon once again my friend :nono:


AGAIN BOBBY---
Since you mentioned it, what facts of mine did you prove to be wrong?
 
Last edited:

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,716
290
83
53
Belly of the Beast
What the hell happened to the explosives being removed by covert Russian forces? You showed a satellite photo yesterday that had trucks shipping the explosives to the Sudan and that came from the Pentagon. And now that video is published stating that the explosives were there after the invasion, Now they think that some soldier removed 250 tons of explosives? Where?s the rest? And why the hell doesn?t anybody know?
 

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
Unlike John Kerry, the rest of us will wait until all of the facts are in before all of those questions can be answered. I do not work in Washington so I do not know why you are directing these questions at me.
All I know is what I've seen so far and when I saw the Pentagon Press conference this morning, I laughed because John Kerry wrongly accussed Bush and the military of not guarding those weapons!!!!

What were those trucks doing there 2 days before the invasion Bobby?
 

danmurphy jr

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 14, 2004
2,966
5
0
Still, don't you think you should get help, listen how you are talking at people you don't even know. sound like one of those o'reilly guys. more people have regstered to vote this year than any time in history. the elephants are trying to keep the poor and blacks from voting but if it doesn't work bush is toast. you'll all be in white coats
 

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
Dan I hate to break it to you but this is only an internet chatboard. Nobody is going to "get help" for themselves because they piss off a few anonomous web-posters. You're taking this way too seriously.

I will say however, one of the things we do in Madjacks Politics is we try our best to "stay on topic". I know you're a little new here, so I'll let you slide. In the future, especially if it's my thread, please try to discuss the issues at hand, not my personal state of mind. Thanks and welcome to the boards!
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,716
290
83
53
Belly of the Beast
Certainly, I?m not asking you. I?m saying that the Pentagon releases a photo showing a truck or two outside of a building that held explosives 2 days before the invasion and then there?s talk of covert Russki?s in Iraq helping Saddam hide weapons. Then a video tape shows that the weapons were there after the invasion. And then they send some soldier out there to say ?Yep, it was me, I destroyed the weapons.?

So since their first version of what really happened was confirmed to be a lie, the next story is something that no one can confirm.

It?s one thing for Bush to say that Kerry talking without knowing the facts. It?s an entirely more severe matter when no one knows the facts.
 

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
Just refer to my above posts...you keep saying the same shit over and over again Bobby. I'm not going to sit here and repeat myself 10 times. Sober up and quit obsessing on me.

If you're not going to tell me what you think those trucks were doing at the weapons facility 2 days before we invaded just let me know.
 

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
BTW - Actually the first version was the NY Times article and John Kerry accussing our military of "Blundering", which was a lie. You stand corrected. :)
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top