ats: 6-2 (+3.46)
SU dogs: 0-1 (-1)
Would I love to kick Pierce in the nuts right now! :cursin:
My fault for taking Portland ML, not the +4 available.
(I blame kickserve for bad mojo...and he (and his 'nads) should be banned immediately for taunting!) :142lmao: :142lmao:
Detroit -2.5 (+100)
Is this a HUGE sucker line?
Why is the reigning champ only 2' favs against a team that has lost it's best shooter/scorer and has allowed 100+ in their last 3 games?
They were out-rebounded 45-29 v. Seattle!...I don't expect this to improve too much v. Detroit.
Det are 3-0 SU @ Denver last 3, av. win of 21!!!
Denver 2-12 ats last 3 years off an upset loss...and teams off any OT games have a very good ats record next game. (The effect of the OT sems to be over-rated).
Anyway, like I said, either this is a very silly line, or I'm the exact sucker that keeps Vegas tickin'. :cursin:
Good Luck all
SU dogs: 0-1 (-1)
Would I love to kick Pierce in the nuts right now! :cursin:
My fault for taking Portland ML, not the +4 available.
(I blame kickserve for bad mojo...and he (and his 'nads) should be banned immediately for taunting!) :142lmao: :142lmao:
Detroit -2.5 (+100)
Is this a HUGE sucker line?
Why is the reigning champ only 2' favs against a team that has lost it's best shooter/scorer and has allowed 100+ in their last 3 games?
They were out-rebounded 45-29 v. Seattle!...I don't expect this to improve too much v. Detroit.
Det are 3-0 SU @ Denver last 3, av. win of 21!!!
Denver 2-12 ats last 3 years off an upset loss...and teams off any OT games have a very good ats record next game. (The effect of the OT sems to be over-rated).
Anyway, like I said, either this is a very silly line, or I'm the exact sucker that keeps Vegas tickin'. :cursin:
Good Luck all

