These guys sure dont look like the best team in the nation to me..........I just cant figure how they can continually sleep walk through these first halves of games.......last 2 home games they play Washington and Arizona(the 2 Pac 10 doormats) and they barely take a double digit lead into the break.......these are the types of teams they should be destroying...........
Another inspiring effort by USC.........
- Thread starter maverick2112
- Start date
14-3 at home against a 2-7 team??? I know it's hard for them to get up for Arizona, but seriously.......
maybe the analysts should stop asking who's number 2 between Auburn and OU and ask who's # 1 between the two of them. USC is a distant third (imo).
osc
maybe the analysts should stop asking who's number 2 between Auburn and OU and ask who's # 1 between the two of them. USC is a distant third (imo).
osc
How are these guys the number one team in the nation?? If Zona has any offense they would be leading this game that is why I took off my play against USC; their offense just has no go to guy especially the wr but freelance is right they always seem to play better in the 2nd half too bad they dont play anyone this year to test them Their schedule is pitiful :142lmao:
Mav, the way the OU and Utah games have ended, USC may find a way to lose this one straight up.
GL
Bill
GL
Bill
mjalam said:
Considering Zona averages about 3 points a game........As bad as their offense is, they probably could'nt score against 6 of us posters.........
I feel like "The Man's" Butt Boy today. I now fully understand, "the agony of defeat".
And yes, I am pretty!!! :tmi:
GLTA
I am going to get my thirty eight and shoot this screen of myself.
Goodnight,
Bill :flush:
And yes, I am pretty!!! :tmi:
GLTA
I am going to get my thirty eight and shoot this screen of myself.
Goodnight,
Bill :flush:
Bush loses a fumble that guy is soft and now zona turns that into a td?? Is this game being played at USC; this is sad
look at Cal/UW today, was 3-0 most of fh, (course my under 50 play got shot after looking almost no way wouldnt come in) and Cal crushess UW in 2nd half ... but as Ive said about USC many times, no better 2nd half team in nation
Well............my halftime pep talk worked.........If USC gets serious no one will stop them.........just wonder why they start off so flat in games......
. Why is USC getting a free pass? (college football news)
Why is there the assumption that it’s between Oklahoma and Auburn to see who gets the number two slot to play for the national championship? Why isn’t USC in the mix? No one is saying USC isn’t one of the top two teams in America, if not number one, but everyone is assuming USC belongs in the national title game just because it started the season ranked number one. It didn’t earn the number one spot; it was given the number one spot. No one is even considering the possibility that Auburn and Oklahoma might actually be better. Now it gets down to who deserves to be playing for the national championship and it’s not fair to simply assume USC is the nation’s best team without looking hard at everyone's body of work examining all of the big wins (more on this in a moment). Has everyone forgotten how close USC came to losing to Virginia Tech? How about the close call against a Stanford team that won’t come close to going to a bowl? Are we supposed to be impressed by beating up a Pac 10 that’s not all that strong? Does winning the Pac 10 compare to winning the SEC or Big XII? Everyone needs to realize that there are three teams in this mix and make this a three team race. It's only fair to Auburn and Oklahoma..
Why is there the assumption that it’s between Oklahoma and Auburn to see who gets the number two slot to play for the national championship? Why isn’t USC in the mix? No one is saying USC isn’t one of the top two teams in America, if not number one, but everyone is assuming USC belongs in the national title game just because it started the season ranked number one. It didn’t earn the number one spot; it was given the number one spot. No one is even considering the possibility that Auburn and Oklahoma might actually be better. Now it gets down to who deserves to be playing for the national championship and it’s not fair to simply assume USC is the nation’s best team without looking hard at everyone's body of work examining all of the big wins (more on this in a moment). Has everyone forgotten how close USC came to losing to Virginia Tech? How about the close call against a Stanford team that won’t come close to going to a bowl? Are we supposed to be impressed by beating up a Pac 10 that’s not all that strong? Does winning the Pac 10 compare to winning the SEC or Big XII? Everyone needs to realize that there are three teams in this mix and make this a three team race. It's only fair to Auburn and Oklahoma..
Well slept on the play and woke up and played Mich-4 but not quite as large as I originally intended to play.
There are going to be complaints every year about someone getting screwed by the bcs. Last year SC fans thought they got screwed, this year it looks like auburn or Oklahoma will be complaining. How you can say that SC shouldn't be ranked #1 baffles me, when USC beats Oklahoma or auburn I guess there will be some other reason why the mighty SEC or Big 12 got screwed. 
Last edited:
