Doctor Mistakenly Amputates Wrong Foot

bookie

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 9, 2004
111
0
0
Mon Dec 27,10:03 PM ET


TUXTLA GUTIERREZ, Mexico - A doctor at a public hospital in southern Mexico mistakenly amputated the right leg of an elderly patient who had sought treatment for an infection in his left foot, the patient's family announced Sunday.

Seeking treatment for a foot wound aggravated by diabetes, Alberto Lopez, 74, was admitted to a Social Security Institute hospital in Tuxtla Gutierrez, 430 miles south of Mexico City, and underwent surgery on Friday.

But the patient emerged from surgery without a right leg — and still suffering from the original infection — according to family members who filed a complaint Sunday with the state attorney general's office and a national medical arbitration commission.

As of Sunday, Lopez had not yet been notified that the wrong limb was amputated unnecessarily, according to his daughter, Esperanza Lopez.

"He could die on us just from the impact," she said. "What we are demanding of the authorities is that the person responsible be punished."

Hospital director Jesus Siman acknowledged that a mistake was made and said the responsible doctor had been removed from the hospital while authorities investigate the incident. The doctor under investigation could not be reached for comment.
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
Hmmm....notice where this took place.

Notice also that it makes headlines.

Ebenezar and his band of thieves would make you believe that this happens every other day in our country.

Guess what happens if you try to take away this guy's license in the USA?

Ebenezar and his band of thieves sue you on his behalf!!!
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
Several assumptions there Doc which I may have to take issue with. First, how do you figure its a headline? Second, I never said, implied or insinuated that it happens every other day in the USA. It happens more than every other day. Actually it happens over 120 times a day if we take the lower end of this study. There are between 44,000 and 98,000 deaths due to medical mistakes as determined by your very own Institute of Medicine.

Yep, lets get rid of the lawyers so that doctors can continue to kill and chop off wrong limbs with impunity. We really don't want to get into there pocket books.

Eddie
 

ferdville

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 24, 1999
3,165
5
0
78
So Cal
What about lawyers that knowingly contributed to getting their guilty clients off scott free? Does Johnny Cochran ring a bell? This also happens every day no doubt hundreds of times. Let's just admit that there are lousy lawyers, lousy doctors, lousy cops, lousy teachers, and lousy clerks at the local 7-11. Blindly defending incompetents in any profession makes no sense.
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
Eddie -- here is a memo to you --

about 80-90% of patients are in some way mismanaged.

Now what are we supposed to do -- have everyone sue?

That number is pretty much right on target -- we DO have about 50-100K deaths due to medical "mistakes".

Now can you imagine if all these people sued? The price of medicine would go up by thousands just to be admitted for a day.

And guess what happens if you try to get rid of a bad doctor? Some numbnut lawyer sues on his behalf and it creates even more of a hastle and takes YEARS to get rid of him.

When we have perfect diagnostics and perfect protocols for every sequence of symptoms and patients elicit perfect histories and treatments never have any side effects maybe just maybe we will start to cut down on that number.

Doctors have clear intentions of doing their best and realize for the most part that their practice is limited by human nature. Regardless, they are always intending to help everyone.

Lawyers, on the other hand, screw people over any time they get involved with anything. They are intentionally dishonest, and there are no repercussions for such behavior. And they interfere with health care by lowering the quality by preventing doctors from being decertified. Some folks believe that this is intentional so that more patients can be harmed -- thus helping their feeding frenzy.

Vultures I tell you....Vultures.
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
You don't like the verdict in the Simpson case do you Ferdville? Your kinda happy about the verdict in the Peterson case though? Thats what happens when you try the cases in the media. My comment was meant as a retort to all the lawyer bashing and tort reform garbage tjat Freeze. Wayne and guys like you post on a daily basis.

We ain't talking perfection here Freeze, just chopping off the wrong leg. What should we do with the 50k - 100k mistakes? Fire all those docs and hospitals.

Raymond, it depends. If its Jason Elam well into eight figures. If its Orlando Mare- 10 bucks.

Eddie
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
Well we sure shouldnt be paying lawyers for medical mistakes and deflecting the cost towards people who actually pay for the medicine.

Doesn't appear like you lawyers are quite the help that you appear to be with all these "mistakes" still going on does it?

All it demonstrates is your lack of knowledge about how little we know even with all our current technology.

And just like the dishonest snake you are, you insinuate that the 50-100K mistakes are the fault of doctors -- not at all the fault of diagnostics, poor histories from patients, side effects from medicine, etc. etc.

Modern medicine prolongs and saves more lives than it takes, and you lawyers seem to think/or dishonestly insinuate that no risk is involved in going to the hospital -- nor should there ever be.

Every therapeutic treatment plan has its shortfalls. We are humans.

The solution to the problem definitely does not lie in the hands of greedy rotten lying snakes.

No Ebenezar, filling up your pockets does not help the situation at all. All it does is

1 increase costs
2 hinder us from getting rid of offending doctors
3 takes away time spent in clinics to time spent in the courts -- increasing the already problematic availiabiltiy problem.
4 cause emotional distress for the sued doctor who is a victim of plunder in our lottery based court system
5. as you can see does not help in limiting mistakes as 50-100K affect life or death as it is even with all these lawsuits.
6. increase time spent in hospital for patients because of fear of a guy with a heart condition for example -- who could be discharged but handled as an outpatient -- but no we now have to handle all these "scary" things in house so we dont get sued for sending someone home how has a .001% chance of having a suddem MI when he would have died just as easily in the hosptial

I could go on Ebbie but I will leave you with those to think about now.

Maybe you can start reforming your profession and "do the right thing" by helping the little guys -- all of us who want affordable, accessible, quality--evidence based (now scared-of-lawsuits-based) healthcare
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
168
63
Bowling Green Ky
I agree Edward, the doctor should be held accountable and the patient compensated where we differ is that you should have a windfall at anothers expense.
An arbitration board would do just fine and cut out the middle man and direct "all" compensation to the one that actually had the loss.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
What's the big deal. You think mistakes even worse then this don't happen every day here. They just don't report them all because many are payed off way before the court date even gets set. No big story for FOX and CNN to play with. If they can't stir the pot they don't report it. The ones you here about are the ones asking for to much. The everyday 1 or 2 million go un-noticed. And why some of these hospital give Doc's 3/4 chance is just nuts.
 

maverick2112

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 16, 2001
2,967
5
38
Wyoming
ferdville said:
What about lawyers that knowingly contributed to getting their guilty clients off scott free? Does Johnny Cochran ring a bell? This also happens every day no doubt hundreds of times. Let's just admit that there are lousy lawyers, lousy doctors, lousy cops, lousy teachers, and lousy clerks at the local 7-11. Blindly defending incompetents in any profession makes no sense.


And after this last 4 weeks......LOUSY AND I MEAN LOUSY HANDICAPPERS...........ME!!!!!!!
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top