-3.5 to a pick ?
- Thread starter Senor Capper
- Start date
smart_money said:Miami Ohio opened a -3 vs Iowa St...by kickoff, Iowa St was a -2... ISU won by 4
North Carolina opened a -3 vs Boston College...by kickoff, Boston College was a -1...Boston College won by doubles
Alabama opened a -3.5 vs Minny...by kickoff, game was pk...Minny won by, i forgot, but they covered
USC opened a -3.5 vs Oklahoma...right now, Oklahoma is -1...Oklahoma won by.....
northern illinois opened at -1....by kickoff, troy was -3.
troy got smashed.
bowling green opened at 4.5. by kickoff, it was down to 3.
memphis got smashed.
utah opened at 17. by kickoff, it was down to 13.5
pittsburgh got smashed.
just playing devils advocate.
although to your point, line moves across 'zero' have been profitable for the most part.
Last edited:
As far as the consensus goes for this game I believe it is almost dead even.
Espn shows a 55% edge for USC (over 550,000 votes).
Reason for line movement is sharp money on OU. Game should have opened a pk, no reason for one team to be favored. USC's sexy offense was the only reason for the opening line.
gl
Espn shows a 55% edge for USC (over 550,000 votes).
Reason for line movement is sharp money on OU. Game should have opened a pk, no reason for one team to be favored. USC's sexy offense was the only reason for the opening line.
gl
YEAH BABY..GOOD LUCK SENOR CAPPER...i got + 1 from local yokel............
SENOR SMELLS A RAT... :142lmao:
GOOD LUCK :clap:
SENOR SMELLS A RAT... :142lmao:
GOOD LUCK :clap:
Funny how it seemed the anti-USC stance betting-wise and on the forum started when Cal lost to Texas Tech.
Obviously, if a totally unmotivated, wide- receiverless Cal team (who, when healthy, outplayed USC on their homefield) got crushed by Texas Tech, just no way USC could compete with Oklahoma.
Obviously, if a totally unmotivated, wide- receiverless Cal team (who, when healthy, outplayed USC on their homefield) got crushed by Texas Tech, just no way USC could compete with Oklahoma.
