National Championship In Game Thread

[Hoops]

ive been more impressed with jarrett the times ive seen him this year than i was with williams last year. seems jarrett has more reliable hands.

Wow...shocked that anyone would say that. Jarrett is a very good receiver, but Williams is in a totally different class.

 

[vinnie]

well at least I'm not going to take it up the :142hump: in the last minute. I'll have plenty of time to prepare myself for the loss :142lmao:

 

[bookkilla]

damn, there goes my UNDER play... :cursin:

 

[Sun Tzu]

What happens in this game doesnt meanone conference is great or bad. That's just silly. I could just as easily argue the same nonsense from the Cal-Texas Tech game and it would be just as invalid.

 

[RexBudler]

that one play is the difference between winning and losing .

If that one play ends up to be the difference which I doubt it will be, thats not saying much for Okl. Good teams overcome mistakes. Still a long ways to go

 

[gman2]

Wow...shocked that anyone would say that. Jarrett is a very good receiver, but Williams is in a totally different class.

i dont know why it is. i just have never been all that impressed with williams. i got into it with scott last year when i said williams wasnt anywhere near keyshawn johnson as far as a college receiver. williams reminds me of terrell owens....without the hands. great physical tools, dominant physical presence, but dropped too many balls.

 

[mjalam]

INT USC


LET THE ROUT BEGIN!!!!

 

[mjalam]

whoever said peterson was gonna run all over usc

was smoking


they play big games well.


LET'S GO TROJANS!

 

[saint]

Game. Set. Match.

 

[Hoops]

Long way to go, but USC looking good obviously. Classic example of one play making a game. USC might win by 30 and that one play is the difference between winning and losing - exactly why things like scoring margin and comparing scores of games should never be the basis of much of anything.

Like when Cal was driving to go up 21-10 over Texas Tech and one of Cal's receivers hands of brick led to an INT and resulting score the other way?

Come on...excuses and the like for when a Big 12 team is losing, but when it the situation is reversed, the Pac-10 is obviously a fraud and sucks?

 

[mjalam]

Like when Cal was driving to go up 21-10 over Texas Tech and one of Cal's receivers hands of brick led to an INT and resulting score the other way?

Come on...excuses and the like for when a Big 12 team is losing, but when it the situation is reversed, the Pac-10 is obviously a fraud and sucks?

exaclty

 

[ELVIS]

looks like white should have left early for the draft last year

bet he doesn't get drafted until the 7th round this year. :moon:

 

[ststrl]

PAC-10 haters, where far out thou?

I know it's early but how do we have a 4 point swing in such a major game????

 

[bosco]

this is like the f-ing loiusville game, lets give them 21 points and see if we can still win

 

[Trentwalker]

You know what's real classy? Rubbing it in after the fact.

 

[fla]

All Right Now, baby it's All Right Now!

:clap:

 

[Sun Tzu]

Hoops I didnt say anybody sucked. And I wasnt on here during the Holiday Bowl. I also dont come on here rating conferences. And I certianly am not making excuses. I am just saying to base some concept of what conference is best based on one game is absurd, and when folks compare scores of who played who doesnt have some great meaning. Why are you insisting on making more of it than what I said?

 

[mjalam]

You know what's real classy? Rubbing it in after the fact.

and all of the other people who said the pac 10 sucks...usc will get ran all over by peterson...they were classy too.

 

[mjalam]

28-7 touchdown


LET THE ROUT CONTINUE....

LET'S GO TROJANS...KEEP POURING IT ON

 

[baby johnson]

usc by 34+