February 4, 2005 -- CAN a professional handicap per, in good conscience, advise people to bet their hard-earned money against Bill Belichick and the Patriots on the NFL's biggest stage?
At first this appeared an easy tout, but the spread and the Eagles have made it tough.
The line quickly went to Patriots -7 and hasn't fluctuated. When the number is so close to the anticipated outcome, it leaves very little margin for error, especially when you're playing the favorite.
But the real holdup here is the opponent. Consider the three biggest advantages the Patriots have against most teams going in: coaching, quarterback, kicker.
Belichick and departing coordinators Charlie Weis and Romeo Crennel are the best at what they do. You certainly don't want to go up against them if they've had two weeks to prepare and dissect your offensive and defensive operations. But what about Andy Reid? His Eagles are 9-0 after bye weeks, including 3-0 in the postseason.
Tom Brady has never lost a playoff game and already has two Super Bowl MVPs on his mantel. You don't expect him to be rattled by the Eagles' blitzes, choreographed by coordinator Jim Johnson. Brady also has a 1,600-yard runner in Corey Dillon and a handful of non-glorified receivers who make big play after big play.
But what of Donovan McNabb? If not for Peyton Manning, McNabb easily would have been the NFL's MVP. He threw 31 TD passes with only eight interceptions, but what makes him a scary betting foe is that he can still take off and run with the best of them. In this Sunday's Post, ESPN's Ron Jaworski will diagram an Eagles play in which three WRs and the tight end all run deep post patterns, covered by five DBs. On the play, which Jaws took from last season's Pats rout of the Eagles, New England blitzes from all angles out of a 2-4-5 set. This forces Brian Westbrook to stay in and block, which is a Belichick goal, but leaves the whole center of the field wide open. If McNabb can escape the swarm, he can go 20-30 yards or more. Or, he can let loose way down field to any of four receivers, three of whom will be in single-coverage.
Then there's Adam Vinatieri, Mr. Clutch, who has already been the deciding factor in two Super Bowls. But if you're the Patriots, would you want your dynasty to be decided by the Eagles' David Akers kicking a 47-yarder? Didn't think so.
So there it is, a compelling case for Philadelphia, a team that is 15-1 in games in which it has even tried to compete this season, and also is getting the NFL's best receiver of 2004, Terrell Owens, back. But now it goes back to the original question: Can one advise people to bet against the Patriots? Against Brady? Against Belichick?
The answer is: No.
And the main reason is Belichick. He will identify the Eagles' most dangerous weapon, which is Westbrook, and keep him under wraps with blitz responsibility and the NFL's best playmaking linebacker, Tedy Bruschi. He will confuse McNabb with multiple different alignments and personnel packages that he's never seen before, even on Patriots film. He will have Rodney Harrison and the other DBs punish the Philly receivers early, sapping their will (remember what BB's Giants DBs did to Andre Reed in Super Bowl XXV).
How can he do this all at once? Doesn't he need 15 players to spy Westbrook, blitz everyone, watch for McNabb's escape runs and cover all the receivers? He doesn't, because of the sequencing. The Patriots' defense is always ready for the adjustment. One move ahead, or more, in the chess match.
We are watching a dynasty at work, and there's no doubt here that Bob Kraft will be hoisting a third Vince Lombardi Trophy in four years at about 10:15 Sunday night. The margin will determine whether you'll be sipping the $200-a-bottle Cristal or the $4 Andre.
Patriots 31, Eagles 20
=============
It's Super Bowl weekend and not only are the Patriots [stats, news] the team to beat, they are also on the verge of creating a dynasty.
Forget all the stats you'll hear - and have heard for the past two weeks - and focus on this: No team had a tougher road to the Super Bowl than New England, yet no team had an easier trip.
As the AFC playoffs loomed, three things were obvious: The Steelers would get the top seed and home-field advantage throughout the postseason; the Pats weren't far behind the Steelers but would have the unenviable task of winning in Pittsburgh, and the one team nobody wanted to play was the high-scoring Colts, led by Peyton Manning.
In back-to-back weeks, the Pats frustrated the league's best offense in a 20-3 drubbing of Indy, and followed that up by scoring 41 points vs. the NFL's top-rated defense in a 41-27 rout of Pittsburgh.
Off those two efforts, it is safe to say the Pats are on a postseason roll that has them poised to win their third Super Bowl in four years.
But before simply handing them the Lombardi Trophy, remember: The Eagles are a force to be reckoned with.
Philly has lost one meaningful game this season - it was hammered at Pittsburgh one week after the Pats met the same fate - and its losses in the season's final two games were a product of Andy Reid protecting his starters in meaningless games. The Eagles rebounded nicely with two easy wins in the playoffs.
Remember, too, that Reid has never lost a game he has had two weeks to prepare for, and that Philly's defense came together when Jeremiah Trotter became the starter at middle linebacker several weeks ago.
The absence of Terrell Owens - or reduced role if he does play - will hurt, but the Patriots are well aware it is possible to overcome injuries to superstars. And while the lack of Super Bowl experience could hurt the Eagles, New England was in that same position three years ago when it upset the Rams.
Finally, while the 7-point favored Patriots have won two recent Super Bowls, they have done so on final-second field goals and their margin of victory was just three points in both.
This figures to be another down-to-the-wire contest, and the Eagles with a touchdown head start get the call.
Eagles +7