If Philly settles for a fg to go down by 7........the books would have gotten killed. As that was a possibility I was trying to think if anyone would have lost..........all the NE big bettors would have had them at -6.5 whether they bought 1/2 or bet early.........all the big Philly bettors would have pushed or won.........all the book woulds have had to of taken a bath if NE would have won by 7.......
I bet the books loved that Lewis td.......
- Thread starter maverick2112
- Start date
I HAD 7.7 WITH 3 DIFF. LOCALS, ALL SAID THEY WERE BURIED WITH NE -7 AND OVER 47.5
THE PUBLIC SQUARES LOSE AGAIN
THE PUBLIC SQUARES LOSE AGAIN
mode the lode said:
I cant see even why a $100 bettore would not lay 120-100 to get NE at -6.5?????
maverick2112 said:
I agree. I always buy 1/2 pt on ALL football wagers when its at +/- 3 and +/- 7.
Dont mean this as a cut or bash guys........
But why even bet it it you have to lay those poor odds? .................mav/scott...................
I dont even know what you guys had in this game, but just commmenting on this point
Franky
But why even bet it it you have to lay those poor odds? .................mav/scott...................
I dont even know what you guys had in this game, but just commmenting on this point
Franky
Franky Wright
I only had $10 on Eagles and I bet them +7.5 -120. So I had $12 to win $10 instead of $11 to win $10. I don't see a big difference. I was very very close to pulling the trigger and betting 1k on Eagles and I would have laid $200 juice to get +7.5 because I want to be a WINNER if Eagles lose by 7pts. What if Eagles kicked a FG instead of TD at the end? That $100 extra won me $1000.
But I will buy pts even when I bet $1000's. Whats another 10% vig when it means I win instead of pushing. Or maybe even pushing instead of losing.
I rather lose another $100 on a $1000 wager if it means I have chance to win on a key # or push on a key # instead of losing. For me, key #'s are 3 and 7. Sometimes I will buy +9.5 to 10 or -10.5 to -10.
I know statistically it prob. doesn't benefit you in the long run but me personally I am not a grind it out handicapper. I pick very few games and I pound them. I play $5-$100 on regular wagers.
All in all, I don't really care about losing that extra 10% juice.
I only had $10 on Eagles and I bet them +7.5 -120. So I had $12 to win $10 instead of $11 to win $10. I don't see a big difference. I was very very close to pulling the trigger and betting 1k on Eagles and I would have laid $200 juice to get +7.5 because I want to be a WINNER if Eagles lose by 7pts. What if Eagles kicked a FG instead of TD at the end? That $100 extra won me $1000.
But I will buy pts even when I bet $1000's. Whats another 10% vig when it means I win instead of pushing. Or maybe even pushing instead of losing.
I rather lose another $100 on a $1000 wager if it means I have chance to win on a key # or push on a key # instead of losing. For me, key #'s are 3 and 7. Sometimes I will buy +9.5 to 10 or -10.5 to -10.
I know statistically it prob. doesn't benefit you in the long run but me personally I am not a grind it out handicapper. I pick very few games and I pound them. I play $5-$100 on regular wagers.
All in all, I don't really care about losing that extra 10% juice.
Last edited:
:142crying :mj07: :violin:
Alrighty then...................
You won!!! :clap:
$10 big ones..............
Nice going............
Alrighty then...................
You won!!! :clap:
$10 big ones..............
Nice going............
Scott,
I pointed out that it was not a bash or cut in my thread, just an observation like you are so privledged to give.......................
Just my two cents, dont get all bent out of shape...........
By the way I took a futures bet on your Trojans next year
But I have to be honest, they were not the glow in the dark ones :scared :mj07:
GL this year,
Franky
I pointed out that it was not a bash or cut in my thread, just an observation like you are so privledged to give.......................
Just my two cents, dont get all bent out of shape...........
By the way I took a futures bet on your Trojans next year
But I have to be honest, they were not the glow in the dark ones :scared :mj07:
GL this year,
Franky
I just think an extra 10% is not that big of a deal if I lose.........now I am not saying you can lay 10% extra on every bet........but on big games like playoff games, super bowls etc where the line is 7 I just dont mind the extra 10%..........now buying off of 3 means I have to pay like 1.30 for 100 so sometimes I wont do that.......like today if I would have taken NE or Philly I would have bought down........
..........................................................Franky Wright said:But I have to be honest, they were not the glow in the dark ones :scared :mj07:
GL this year,
Franky
Franky
were they the dicks ?
KOD
