+3% SUNDAY +17% LAST WEEK
UW MILWAUKEE +4.5 5% Ml +180 1%
NIAGRA +13 4% Ml +750 .5%
EASTERN KY +16.5 4%
PACIFIC +3.5 4%
UW MILWAUKEE +4.5 5% Ml +180 1%
NIAGRA +13 4% Ml +750 .5%
EASTERN KY +16.5 4%
PACIFIC +3.5 4%
THURSDAY
- Thread starter THUNDER
- Start date
- Status
Can you give me your thoughts on Wisc-Mil Thunder? I have seen a few people in here stating upset, but why are all the espn experts saying Alabama is going to a surprise team and can possibly go far in the tourney? I personally like Wisc-Mil in this game!! Thanks in advance!!
LEE YOU WATCH TOO MUCH ESPN- UwM IS A VERY LONG ATLETIC TEAM PLAYING CLOSE TOO HOME THAT HAS ALOT OF TOURNEY EXPERIENCE WITH MUCH BETTER COACHING. EVERYBODY IS SAYING PACIFIC THIS PACIFIC THAT I HAVE WATCHED THESE GUYS PLAY alot aTHey remind me of wiscy they do all thew little things are well coached and have a couple studs to spice thimgs up.
I come up with a different record for Sunday than +3%
OK STATE UNDER 145.5 6% (WINNER)
DUKE UNDER 142 4% (WINNER)
GT +4 3% (LOSER)
KENTUCKY -3 4% (LOSER)
WISKY +7.5 5% (LOSER)
TT +6 4% (WINNER)
KEnTUCKY 2H -3.5 3% (LOSER)
OK STATE UNDER 145.5 6% (WINNER)
DUKE UNDER 142 4% (WINNER)
GT +4 3% (LOSER)
KENTUCKY -3 4% (LOSER)
WISKY +7.5 5% (LOSER)
TT +6 4% (WINNER)
KEnTUCKY 2H -3.5 3% (LOSER)
i played this system a couple years ago and got burned severely...
good luck this year Thunder (btw, does that stand for The-Under???)
good luck this year Thunder (btw, does that stand for The-Under???)
TWOLVES UNDER 6% POSTED IT ALL TOGETHER- LIVE WITH IT SO IT WAS +5% SORRY- but thanx for the math class. i am looking for a new cfo you my qualify-i may be off a few % here and there up or down but i think i am hanging in there-take care
You've been around here long enough to know the importance of proper recordkeeping. It only invites bashers to start something. Best of luck with the tourney.
) It doesnt matter there is still juice involved. He is not betting 4% to win 4%. If so I would like to play at that book.GRIFFIN said:
ok he's playing % of his bankroll
say his bankroll is $10000
he plays 5% of that,
so $500 is 5% of his bankroll
so its 500 to win 453(something like that)
there is juice but not calculated when he add's up %
say his bankroll is $10000
he plays 5% of that,
so $500 is 5% of his bankroll
so its 500 to win 453(something like that)
there is juice but not calculated when he add's up %
:mj03:G Money said:
A couple of games or % pts off no big deal but Vig must be included or the overall numbers are meaningless and misleading :
GL2ALL
i will never understand the cpa mindset re: record keeping...some peeps seem to be more concerned w/ nitty gritty % accuracy than w/ actually winning...often, a comment from a capper/poster who follows a conference will sway me into a play (hey, it's my money)...my advice, & i acknowledge it's unsolicited, or fwiw, is to simply factor in thunder's plays w/ however you see a particular game's outcome...nobody's infallible, but some are better than most, which is why i always pay attention to thunder's (and other's) plays...glta
- Status
