nit championship: saint joseph/south carolina .....

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
south carolina under 123

total is really low, but its there for a reason imo. both teams are solid defensively, and both marteli and odom have no problem playing the game at a crawl if thats what it takes to win. neither is worried about style points, and thats a good thing because there isnt much 'style' on either roster. should see a lot of shot clock used on most possessions. st.joes has a poor team FT% but i dont think thats necessarily indicative of their ability to knock down FTs overall. its dwayne jones at 53% that kills them; if you take him out of the equation, saint joes makes 72% as a team instead 66%. (note to south carolina: foul that guy at any time). south carolina is bad all around from the line. 61% as a team, and only two guys on their entire roster shoot better than 66%. overall, just two solid defensive teams going at it for the nit title. only one team has shot better than 39% against st.joes in the entire tournament. south carolina held 2 potent offenses (maryland and unlv) to well below their average in their matchup (maryland scored just 67, unlv just 66) and for the tourney as a whole, south carolina allowing 66.5 ppg (and st.joes allowing just 52.6 ppg). just dont see anything that points to an over here. obviously if the refs are whistle-happy and get these teams into the bonus early, that low number might be in jeopardy, but both teams are perimeter-oriented and are content to shoot a lot of jumpers. this one should finish in the 100-teens.
 

HoopsGuru

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 6, 2004
1,478
5
0
you definitely have this one pegged right on. said in another thread a strong play on the under 57 for the 1st half. this game will be lucky to reach 50 by halftime. im not getting screwed by late ft's possibly pushing this one over. as long as carroll/stachitas don't combine for like seven 3's in the first half, its gonna be a winner. good luck with your play, hope it hits.
 

HoopsGuru

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 6, 2004
1,478
5
0
under 57 barely comes in. thankfully that last shot was short. no idea what the 2nd half is gonna bring. i'll be rooting for the under though. lets go hawks!
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
saint said:
You are one lucky bastard :) Nice work.

overtime would have been a brutal way to lose a game that played out as a dead under for 39:53 of the 40:00.
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
on an unrelated note (ptgrd1 and other basketball guys), can you tell me why the hell south carolina wasnt switching screens on carroll in the final minute of the game? every level ive played on, thats basketball 101 in crunch time. on the last st.joes possession (the one where carroll tied it) the kid for south carolina hedged the screen and then recovered back to his man. i about wanted to put my fist through the tv screen when carroll got that clean look. fu.ck hedging in the final 0:30. switch every screen. over the course of the game, switching screens can leave you open to mismatches obviously. but in the final 0:30, theyre going for 3s and youre not switching? what the hell?
 

vyrus858

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 9, 2003
3,137
46
0
44
San Diego, CA
wow, looked like we were both headed towards another meltdown in the end for OT, but we got it brother...had SC, and you had the under, nice to see both of us catch a winner in the same game
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top