GOP used Schiavo for Political Gain

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
I know one of the "Fair and Balanced" cut and pasters we have would post this. But I thought I would save the the trouble.

Counsel to GOP Senator Wrote Memo On Schiavo

By Mike Allen, Washington Post Staff Writer

The legal counsel to Sen. Mel Martinez (R-Fla.) admitted yesterday that he was the author of a memo citing the political advantage to Republicans of intervening in the case of Terri Schiavo, the senator said in an interview last night.



Brian H. Darling, 39, a former lobbyist for the Alexander Strategy Group on gun rights and other issues, offered his resignation and it was immediately accepted, Martinez said.


Martinez, the GOP's Senate point man on the issue, said he earlier had been assured by aides that his office had nothing to do with producing the memo. "I never did an investigation, as such," he said. "I just took it for granted that we wouldn't be that stupid. It was never my intention to in any way politicize this issue."


Martinez, a freshman who was secretary of housing and urban development for most of President Bush's first term, said he had not read the one-page memo. He said he inadvertently passed it to Sen. Tom Harkin (news, bio, voting record) (D-Iowa), who had worked with him on the issue. After that, officials gave the memo to reporters for ABC News and The Washington Post.


Harkin said in an interview that Martinez handed him the memo on the Senate floor, in hopes of gaining his support for the bill giving federal courts jurisdiction in the Florida case in an effort to restore the brain-damaged Florida woman's feeding tube. "He said these were talking points -- something that we're working on here," Harkin said.


The mystery of the memo's origin had roiled the Capitol, with Republicans accusing Democrats of concocting the document as a dirty trick, and Democrats accusing Republicans of trying to duck responsibility for exploiting the dying days of an incapacitated woman.


Conservative Web logs have challenged the authenticity of the memo, in some cases likening it to the discredited documents about Bush's National Guard service that CBS News reported last fall.


The staff of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, at the request of a Democrat, spent a week trying to determine the memo's origin and had come up empty, said an official involved in the investigation.


The unsigned memo -- which initially misspells Schiavo's first name and gives the wrong number for the pending bill -- includes eight talking points in support of the legislation and calls the controversy "a great political issue."


"This legislation ensures that individuals like Terri Schiavo are guaranteed the same legal protections as convicted murderers like Ted Bundy," the memo concludes.


It asserts that the case would appeal to the party's core supporters, saying: "This is an important moral issue and the pro-life base will be excited that the Senate is debating this important issue."


The document was provided to ABC News on March 18 and to The Post on March 19 and was included in news reports about congressional intervention in the Schiavo case. Bush returned from an Easter vacation in Texas and signed the bill shortly after 1 a.m. on March 21.


At the time, other Senate Republican aides claimed to be familiar with the memo but declined to discuss it on the record and gave no information about its origin.


In a statement issued last night, Martinez said that Harkin asked him for background information on the bill and that he gave him what he thought was a routine one-page staff memo on the legislation. "Unbeknownst to me, instead of my one page on the bill, I had given him a copy of the now infamous memo that at some point along the way came into my possession," the statement said.


Harkin said that when he read the part about the politics of the case he thought that was "rather out of line," but he said he did not discuss the matter with Martinez. Harkin said he has no complaints about Martinez.


"I really worked in good faith with Senator Martinez on this issue and I found him to be a decent, caring person to work with on this, and so I have a lot of respect for him," he said.


Martinez said Harkin called him about 5 p.m. yesterday and told him that the memo had come from his office. Martinez said he then called in his senior staff and said, "Something is wrong here." He said that Darling later confessed to John Little, Martinez's chief of staff, and that he said he did not think he had ever printed the memo.

"It was intended to be a working draft," Martinez said. "He doesn't really know how I got it."

Reached by telephone last night, Darling said it would not be appropriate for him to discuss the matter at this time.

Sen. Frank Lautenberg, a member of the Rules and Administration Committee, wrote to the panel's leaders last week to ask for an investigation into the "document, its source, and how it came to be distributed."

"Those who would attempt to influence debate in the United States Senate should not hide behind anonymous pieces of paper," he said.

A Republican Senate official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he is not a committee spokesman, said yesterday that an informal inquiry began almost immediately and is likely to be concluded within a week.

Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) said in an interview Friday that he considered it "ludicrous" to suggest that his party created the document and said Republicans were using such talk to divert responsibility.

"I guess the best defense is a good offense -- that's their theory," he said.

In interviews at the Capitol yesterday, senators from both sides said they found the case perplexing, and a sign of the intense partisanship that permeates the building. Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (news, bio, voting record) (R-Utah) said that the torrent of accusations reflects the bitterness over the life-and-death issues in the Schiavo case, which he said were a proxy on both sides for what provokes "every other ugly political conversation -- that's abortion."

Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.) said he believed that the memo originated with the GOP because it is "totally consistent" with how the Republicans have operated for the past four years. "They just shouldn't lose their memos," he said.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
I was just thinking how Fox must seem cheated. The Republicans paying Journalist to pushed and print there ideas. Fox does it everyday free. They should have charge to.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
I dunno about that DJV. I think that Murdoch is the top Neocon and the others are just doing what he says. Real Republicans and Conservatives are getting pretty nervous lately. The party is starting to split. They can't even keep their memos straight! LOL!
When mentioned their interest was political, and Bush was grandstanding, back in the debate about this I almost got my head handed to me.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
this is huge news?....and sandy" burglar" literally stealing and destroying documents from the national archives barely gets mentioned in the national media....

the guy DESTROYED documents from the national archives....pertaining to pre 9-11 terror intel from the clinton administration....

copies they were....but,there were notes written on those copies that we`ll never see....

why???

because the burglar destroyed them....and he won`t do day 1 in jail...

imagine if it were condy rice or a high profile bush advisor....

you`d never hear the end of it...

thank the lord that the media isn`t biased...

lol

and btw...why isn`t the cronyism involved in the judiciary regarding the sciavo case being reported in the media...all the tie-ins between judges and felos....all the campaign contributions ,law changing and general sneaky bullshit that went on so felos could pocket his $500,000 fee that was earmarked for terri`s rehab?....

and how come nobody`s inquiring as to whether or not there was a life insurance policy involved?....or in actuality.how much of the settlement is left...that will go into poor mark`s pocket....

the good ole` biased mainstream media...

that door swings both ways,gents...
 
Last edited:

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
I am begining to wonder about you GW. I remember when you used to love our country. Now you seem Hell bent on tearing it down and rebuilding it. Without judges!

What Burger did was a terrible thing and it was on all the news stations and it even has it's own thread here on Madjacks. (If that doesn't prove somebody took it serious I don't know what does) But this thread is about The GOP playing politics and playing with your emotions for their political gain. Remember the President riding in from vaction on his great winged stallion in the middle of the night to save the day and sign a piece of legislation that would only benefit one person. When they could have just as easily sent him the paper to sign. Not to mention that it was not constitutional anyway.
Oh, and those Florida judges you mention, you kind of liked them when they handed Bush the Presidency in 2000.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
c`mon,stevie.....what`s this forum come to?.....

can`t a guy a whine a little bit without being brow beaten anymore.... :142squint :mj17:
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Witch is Schiavo or Berger. Not sure where he comes in. Did he rush back to Washington to vote on some stupid amendment.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Sorry GW. It is just that this place is beginning to look like a Board Meeting of the Young Neocons of America by a bunch who claims to be in the middle!.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,494
171
63
Bowling Green Ky
I fail to see the hoopla--the same story was reported by Fox.
Senetors counsel admitted writing memo offered resignation and was accepted. So whats the deal?? or do you find it strange someone admitting to something and not lying about it?
I find it refreshing they don't have to have someone empty their socks or go to Kum Kleen Cleaners to get the goods before they admit fault--depending on what "it" means. :)

Here is your fair and balanced report from Fox--but I think the one on New York Times under it is more interesting/per fair and balanced ;)

The Culprit Is Found

Thursday, April 07, 2005

By Brit Hume



Now some fresh pickings from the Political Grapevine:

The Culprit

Florida Republican Senator Mel Martinez (search) now says that memo on the potential political benefits of the Terri Schiavo case to the GOP came from his own office. Martinez says his legal counsel, Brian Darling (search), wrote it up without his knowledge.

And Martinez claims he accidentally passed it on to Iowa Democratic Senator Tom Harkin on the Senate floor, thinking it was a different document related to the Schiavo case. Martinez says he had no idea he was involved until Harkin named him as the memo's source. He then launched an internal office investigation.

Martinez insists he hadn't seen the memo when he gave it to Harkin. And when FOX's Chris Wallace showed it to him two and a half weeks ago on "Fox News Sunday," Martinez said, "I've never seen [it] before today." Darling, meanwhile, has resigned.

Ban Broken

Zimbabwean dictator Robert Mugabe (search) ? whom world leaders have accused of rigging last week's parliamentary elections ? has defied a European Union travel ban and flown to Rome to pay his respects to Pope John Paul II. But at a mass earlier this week, Mugabe used the occasion to attack Western nations, insisting they're meddling in Zimbabwe's affairs, and saying, "It is sad to note in today's world there are people who want to dominate other people."

Mugabe was not arrested because the Italian government is obliged under treaties with the Vatican to admit people such as Mugabe for the pope's funeral. An archbishop and human rights advocate in Zimbabwe says Mugabe's trip is "shameless," adding, "That man will use any opportunity to fly to Europe to promote himself." Last week, Mugabe called the same archbishop a "half wit" and prayed for God to kill him.

Professors "Cleared"?

The New York Times has reported that a committee at Columbia University (search) has "cleared" professors of allegations they promoted anti-semitism, and found only one instance in which a professor acted beyond "commonly accepted bounds," when he became angry at a student for defending Israel.

The Times then quotes that professor, denying the incident ever took place. But the Times never quotes any of the students who complained in the first place and it turns out that's because the Times struck a deal with Columbia officials: If they provided the committee's report ahead of its official release, the Times wouldn't seek comment from other interested parties. The Times now says its story was "incomplete ... [and] should not have appeared in that form.
 
Last edited:

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Thank God for Fox news! Wow, and the Senator didn't know anything about it! LOL!
It is big because that poor woman was all we saw on our tv screens because even the President, in a great case of showmanship, got involved. If you read the memo it says it will benefit them politically to get involved. I wonder if Fox has reporters working to uncover what was meant by that. Stay tuned!
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
stevie...in all fairness....i`m much closer to a centrist than you`ll ever be...

have you ever strayed from the strict democratic party line?.....

i honestly can`t remember seeing it.....

unlike kosar and smurphy who appear to actually form their own opinions....

you never seem to sway...even a little..

people who live in glass houses.....
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
What Democratic line have I taken GW. I told you I was only voting for Kerry because he wasn't Bush. I try to keep Clinton and Kerry out of conversations about Bush because that is what the right does. You attack Bush and they go oh yeah, well how about Clinton. You don't have to go far to see it. Dogs did it in this very thread. Somehow, he mentions a stained dress in this thread about Terri.
I am against a lot of what the dems do. The problem is that they are not in charge. I mentioned I like Boxer. I like her much better than Biden, who I don't trust.
I have never seen you take the Democratic side of any issue either.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
StevieD said:
What strict Democratic line have I taken GW. I told you I was only voting for Kerry because he wasn't Bush. I try to keep Clinton and Kerry out of conversations about Bush because that is what the right does. You attack Bush and they go oh yeah, well how about Clinton. You don't have to go far to see it. Dogs did it in this very thread. Somehow, he mentions a stained dress in this thread about Terri.
I am against a lot of what the dems do. The problem is that they are not in charge. I mentioned I like Boxer. I like her much better than Biden, who I don't trust.
I have never seen you take the Democratic side of any issue either.
Why aren't you posting stories about Tom Delay. You and the other Centrists out there?
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
i`m actually not a republican...i`m conservative....but i could give a whit about republicans....or democrats....

it`s the extremists of both parties that scare me....

liberals admittedly scare me more.....

i have no use for moral phonies like o` reilly.....or rush limbaugh....

but i see the real danger in liberals that literally hate this country and want to turn it into another europe...

i see danger in the strangling intellectual diversity in the arts and humanities. ...

i see people that want endless amnesty for illegals...want to lay open the borders...want to remove any and all remnants of religion from the national consciousness...

fighting any and all efforts to keep the country safe...by using scare tactics to undermine the patriot act.....

in a nutshell,i believe that the life of free men and women has to be a life of self-discipline, self-control and self-sacrifice' and it has to be based on an elementary moral system....


i see liberalism(hollywood,the judicial system,the universities)as a form of elitism. its advocates have the feeling that they have been chosen to advise, to moralise, to know better than the 'normal' people what is right or wrong, what the people should do, what will be good for them.....

that scares me...
 

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
I certainly appreciate your viewpoints, weasel. I think most of us are very close to the center, but have been forced to choose sides in recent years - both of which have been somewhat hijacked by the extreme. Damn shame.

I don't see the same dangerous liberal agenda - or at least I see it as being pretty much offset by the other side. There are certainly specific examples from each side.

What is interpreted by some as "hating America" is often just hating or disagreeing with things going on. Many opposed to the Iraq war, for example, actually feel that the war hurts our country. So their criticism is based on caring and wanting to protect the US.

But again - unfortunately, the loud idiots on each side of the spectrum have basically hijacked everything. The quieter, patient, logical voices closer to the middle get lost. I hate it - I catch myself trying to compete with that and realize that all I do is become one of them.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
SM, I don't know how anyone can be in the middle on the war. You either buy the line the President is selling or you don't. Now, if you don't, then the Corporate Press labels you an extremist. If you are for the war the Corporate Press calls you a conservative or a centrist or some other crock of crap. I happen to think that before you put American soldiers in harms way a certain criteria has to be met. I don't care who the President is. But Iraq was not a threat to the United States and therefore it was not worth the lives of over 1500 kids. I also feel that if a President does decide to send our young into battle he has a moral obligation to tell us the truth. I feel Mr. Bush has failed on that level too. I don't think any of those views makes me an extremist but I could argue that anyone taking the other side is an extremist.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
StevieD said:
SM, I don't know how anyone can be in the middle on the war. You either buy the line the President is selling or you don't. Now, if you don't, then the Corporate Press labels you an extremist. If you are for the war the Corporate Press calls you a conservative or a centrist or some other crock of crap. I happen to think that before you put American soldiers in harms way a certain criteria has to be met. I don't care who the President is. But Iraq was not a threat to the United States and therefore it was not worth the lives of over 1500 kids. I also feel that if a President does decide to send our young into battle he has a moral obligation to tell us the truth. I feel Mr. Bush has failed on that level too. I don't think any of those views makes me an extremist but I could argue that anyone taking the other side is an extremist.
Ya know - I agree, it would be wonderful if the administration would tell the truth. The backpedalling on reasons for the war are nauseating.

But at this point - it's almost moot. We have to get the the job done as best as possible. People opposed to the war have to swallow pride and actually root for things to turn out well enough for Dubya too actually look good. It's obviously best for everyone. We know the reasons for the war were sh!t, and Dubya is a wreckless moron - BUT - I want him to end up looking good and the Left to look wrong - because basically that means things went well.

Lose the battle, win the war. Pragmatism at it's finest.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
SM, I want to win the war too. I do not want to promote the liars who got us into the mess. Think about it, either they lied, or they are incompetent. The whole planning of the war was wrong, even if you agree with the war you have to agree the planning was wrong. Even Cheney admits that. I don't know of anybody on the left who wants us to lose. I just don't want to keep promoting the scoundrels who got us into it.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Soon we leave Iraq I hope. There starting to demostrate for us to go home. And there importing oil now instead of exporting. I wonder why. I'm still trying to find what Bush has done other then a tax break, that helped few. And those few are starting to pay it back in higher and higher interest rates. And gas is such a great deal. Even milk at all time high. Health cares a real deal.
As for Schiavo bring used. That was stupid on there part.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top