This system went 20-0 in the first half

[cisco]

This system went 20-0, plus 20 units, for the first half of the season.


Play on a team that has lost their last 3 or more games as home favorite, and is again favored at home. Must be -110 or better.

Two games are pending:
Cubs
Angels

Breakdown of teams with with consecutive losses as a home favorite this year before winning:

LAA..4 (pending)
LAA..3*
ARI..3
ARI..5
BAL..3 (2)
BOS..3
CLE..4
CHC..4 (pending)
CWS..3
FLA-..3
HOU..3
MIL...3
MIN...4
NYM..3 (2)
NYY..3
NYY..4
PIT...5
SDO..3
SFO..3
STL..4

*corrected Angels losing streak from 5 to 3

 

[rrc]

Question...with the Angels loss as a 190 fave yesterday after three consecutive home losses as a fave what is the next step. Based on a one unit play, the player is down 1.9 units. In their next game as a home favorite do you bet to win 1 unit PLUS the 1.9 units you are down? Thanks.

 

[cisco]

We are playing to win a unit, not break even. The bookie may hold your money for a while but he's going to return it plus give you a unit.

If you bet 190 to win 100 and lost and the next game (vs Oakland) is -160 you will be betting
190+100 = 290 x 1.6 = 464

You need to set your unit size so that you can complete the chase, if necessary. (without dropping out on the last game because the amount is too high.)

Even of you bet $10 you'd be up $200 right now.

 

[deportes]

great work Cisco, keep it up. Will have to follow it next 1/2.

 

[Lefty Guns]

excellent, great info...

 

[Billy Barooooooo]

Your title is so misleading!!!!!

 

[cisco]

No it's not Billy. It's a 3 day chase system and it's 20-0.

Example:

Arizona
6/25 -170 L
6/29 -210 L
6/30 -152 L
7/8 -145 L Begin chase
7/9 -165 L
7/10 ?124 W

Arizona bet;
Gm #1 145 to win 100..Lose
Gm #2 145 +100 x 1.65 = 404..Lose
Gm #3 404 +100 x 1.24 =625 Win

You are +1 unit

 

[LetsMakeMoney]

hey cisco do the national leauge allstars fall under your system play,they've lost 6 in a row :mj07: :mj07: i really hope they do lol

 

[Billy Barooooooo]

What happen to the ANGELS???? 20-0 means you never lost a game. YOU HAVE LOST A FEW GAME. Yeah sure your up 20 units with a system that chases and that is great! I give you props on that but your NOT 20-0!!!!! Do you not count loses? You only count the times you win? I think that is misleading!!!!


BB

 

[Billy Barooooooo]

Fu*king Angels lost again today. This play will be pending until at least July 21 vs the Yankees. Think this was you? So that is a game that lost! I Guess I'm confused cause I read your other post at another site. Wouldn't the angles be a loser? Not trying to have debate you just trying to understand you!


BB

 

[cisco]

Billy'
As you can see from the Arizona example, Arizona lost twice but the system play was srill in effect. The system is for 3 games. 3 league games is the same as 1 system game.
The Angels lost Gm #1 of a possible 3 games. I have 2 to go
Gm #2 is on July 18 vs Oakland-Santana/Saarloos if the Angels are -110 or higher.

 

[infinii]

The semantics of this system essentially mean that there is no easy way of keeping a record.

I agree the 20-0 is misleading. This system basically involves chasing until you win. The zero loss that cisco contends the system to have means that so far this season, if you chased everyone of these situations, you would win eventually.

One thought, I wouldn't use this system near the end of season because you might run out of games to chase.

 

[WHY ASK WHY?]

Even without chasing it still looks like a winner ?
(17-3?) or did I miss something?.........ain't bad I like the idea of ending up plus money
but thats just me...

WHY?

 

[cisco]

Infinii- The chase only lasts 3 games. After that it's a loss. It's not a chase till you win. (martingale system)

The chase's stop two weeks before the end of the season.

 

[ScreaminPain]

Any system (angle) that calls for you to increase your bet size while losing is unplayable.

I can name a few "betting systems" on roulette and blackjack that call for this type of lunacy. They all eventually fail, because you get to the "house limit" before you can recoup your previous losses.

IF, you had an unlimited bankroll, and IF there were no house limits, a system like this may succeed, but until those things occur, it won't work.

 

[smurphy]

it looks like the record without any chasing is 12-8, up a couple units.

chasing is bad, mmmkay.

 

[Super Idiota]

This "system" may prove to be worthy for a bettor with a large bankroll or as ScreaminPain said a house with no limits, but the reality is that chasing previous losses is never a good idea. In fact chasing losses may not even be considered a system rather just a strategy to at some point get lucky and win back all you've lost a still gain a little.

If I understand the strategy correctly, here is a scenario for those with a standard unit wager of $100.

Game 1: -150
Game 2: -125
Game 3: -110

In this scenario, I feel these lines are fair and reasonable as the third game offers the lowest possible line for the play to have action.

Game 1: $150/$100 LOSS = -1.5 units

You lose Game 1 and now are forced to bet more on Game 2 to recoup the lossed units, but still win net 1 unit.

Game 2: $312.50/$250 LOSS = -4.625 units

Had you won Game 2 you would have won $250. Combined with the loss of $150 on the previous wager it nets you $100, but instead you lose and are now down 4.625 units or $462.50.

Game 3: $618.75/$562.50 ???

Now you are faced with having to wager over 6 units to win $562.50. IF you win, your net gain is a mere $100 or 1 unit. IF you lose, you have just lossed a total of 10.8125 units over a three wager stretch.

Now, where can you find someone that is willing to wager 10+ units to win 1. Again this might work for those with a standard unit of $10 or $20, but certainly not for someone with standard units of $500 or $1000.

Good Luck Everybody!

 

[cisco]

Winner yesterday on Day #2.

Now 21-0