The Global Warming Myth - Ocelot stands corrected

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,715
290
83
53
Belly of the Beast
CHARLESMANSON said:
*****FROM THE E.P.A. 2004 (The same source you quoted)

"Environmentalist claim that the increase in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the earth's atmosphere are the result of human activity.
Yet this ignores the FACT that a single volcanic eruption produces more of these gases than the entire wood, coal and oil burned by human in ALL HUMAN HISTORY."


Ocelot....please dispute this statement or else please just give up. You are starting to look like a real idiot.

CHARLESMANSON said:
FROM THE EPA=
"Environmentalist claim that the increase in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the earth's atmosphere are the result of human activity.
Yet this ignores the FACT that a single volcanic eruption produces more of these gases than the entire wood, coal and oil burned by human in ALL HUMAN HISTORY."

Compared to how much emissions humans create with the internal combustion engine we don't even make a difference to the environment.
BUT to make the claim that human activity is seriouslt altering the atmosphere while IGNORING the #1 source of these gases - volcanic activity - is absurd in the extreme."

CHARLESMANSON said:
A single volcanic eruption produces more of these gases than the entire wood, coal and oil burned by humans in ALL HUMAN HISTORY.

CHARLESMANSON said:
FACT: A single volcanic eruption produces more of these gases than the entire wood, coal and oil burned by humans in ALL OF HUMAN HISTORY.

Why are you ignoring the above statement??? If you're so bright then please give us a reason.

CHARLESMANSON said:
That's why debating with you is pointless. You are living in a fantasy world Ocelot and I think it's pretty sad. I GIVE FACTS AND I BACK THEM UP WITH SOURCES AND YOU JUST STICK YOUR HEAD IN THE SAND.

Manson, I have already explained that I know very little on the environment and ozone and the like. When I know little about something, I tend not to argue about it because I don?t know what I?m talking about. Ignorance on a subject doesn?t seem to stop you from talking about it infinitem. Just like Scott4USC, there?s an inverse relationship to the validity of your points and the number of smilies that your post contain.

You stated that the EPA stated that a ?"Environmentalist claim that the increase in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the earth's atmosphere are the result of human activity.
Yet this ignores the FACT that a single volcanic eruption produces more of these gases than the entire wood, coal and oil burned by human in ALL HUMAN HISTORY." I don?t care where you got the facts from, somewhere on the expansive world wide web this must be documented somewhere, anywhere, but it?s not.

My posts have never been about whether the environment is getting better or worse, because I have no idea. My point was that you are a liar and your sources are bogus. And that has been proved beyond all reasonable doubt.
 

Palehose

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 22, 2005
590
1
0
CHARLESMANSON said:
Looks like when Ocelot is getting destroyed in a debate or has someone who disagrees with him he resorts to "putting them on ignore". The mind of a liberal is a funny thing.

These liberals will argue until the cows come home!! NO MATTER WHAT. I guess no need for a volcano thread after reading all this lol. NASA, USGS, Univ. scientists etc. Ferdville you could give these guys all the factual information in the world and they will still argue with you no matter what. Our case is rested and if these crybabies want to live in denial then that's their problem not ours. :) These people are priceless, predictable, and it's easy to control their emotions with the tug of a string. Here it is a week later and Bobby Blue Chip is still obsesssing on the Environmental Protection Agency!!! Like I said Bobby, I do not get all of my information from the internet. Does that mean it isn't valid?? Whatever, if you don't want to beleive that volcanos cause more damage than humans then that is your problem not mine....ASK A SCIENTIST! I'd say PLENTY of info has been provided in this thread to support the point. Thanks for all who contributed......nice to see a lot of you out there have a brain. :mj07:

The Madjacks liberals willl whine and complain no matter what. It is pretty funny to see them get all hot and bothered over something as boring as a volcano lol. I even like it better when they get all hot and bothered because of ME! :clap: Like I've said before, the shit I come up is only designed to get these liberals to cry and moan and argue and get all emotional. Works everytime. It's a cinch and quite halarious. They always bite the bait. :) Ocelot, you take the cake. You outta get a job with moveon.org so you have something other to do than spend your life 24/7 complaining and arguing with people online. Don't you have a life? lol Glad I could get your panties in a bunch guys. Remember --- just like a puppet on a string :brows: :142smilie

Amen ! Liberalism is a mental disorder !
Hmm what Ticket will drive them nuts the most ?

Giuliani - Rice ?

nah how bout this one :

Jeb Bush - Rice for 2008! Thats the ticket! They will start throwing themselves off cliffs and each splat will make this country a better place ! :mj07:
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,715
290
83
53
Belly of the Beast
No way is palehose Manson. While they both support a war they want no part in themselves, there's no way that Manson would marginalize the American troops in WWII - No way.
 

ferdville

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 24, 1999
3,165
5
0
78
So Cal
True. He is consistent and would assume an entirely different persona. It could well be the work of the two Allens or the two Castles.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
It's pretty rare that a true newbie signs up at madjacks sports gambling forum, doesn't post for a month, then barrages us in the political area and doesn't post anywhere else. Whatever the case, he's just as annoying.
 

Palehose

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 22, 2005
590
1
0
As usual you guys are clueless :

1. I never marginalized our efforts in WWII I only told the truth we came in at the end of the war in Europe ....Again what part of a war that started in 1940 and The US Landing on D-Day June 6th 1944 and a German surrender on VE day May 8th 1945 Cant you get through your thick heads ? What part of 95 % or more of the approximate 50 or more Million death's in the Europeon theater were dead Before we landed do you not understand ?? The only point I was trying to make is that our Troops today in Iraq are doing a very Honorable and worthy deed one just as honorable as us landing on D-day to return countries back to people that were not willing to defend themselves in the 1st place ! The onlly people marginalizing our troops is the liberals and the liberal media and they dont deserve it !

2. I found Mad Jack sports when looking for a Sports site to post at ,after browsing the forums and realizing it was aimed more at the gambling aspects of sports I happend to see This Forum full of Liberal idiots that needed to be slapped around with some facts . Lets face it a fact is the biggest enemy of the Liberal mindset !

Edited for numbers of Casualties I always confuse Holocoust totals with WWII casualties
 
Last edited:

Palehose

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 22, 2005
590
1
0
BobbyBlueChip said:
No way is palehose Manson. While they both support a war they want no part in themselves, there's no way that Manson would marginalize the American troops in WWII - No way.


What a stupid thing to say ! I have family members their and we are very proud of them !
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
WWII we were in it behind the seen way before 1944. We came in at end of war my ass. Germany ran over Europe and was just relaxing when the real war started on D Day. What the hell Poland took a month. France first words from there mouth was surrender.
South Africa was a walk over till we got there.
Russia beat Germany. Well it's a good thing we sent all the equipment we did to Russia in early 40's or they would have chit there pants. And if we had not stopped more of the German army from going to the Russian front by doing D Day. Well they and the Russian might still be fighting today.
The real war was when we kicked there ass out of South Africa and Italy. Then it was France and Denmark. I guarantee you none of that get's done with out the U S A. Including part of the Russia victory.
 

Palehose

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 22, 2005
590
1
0
Big Diference between supporting a war and fighting in one, and as far as us fighting in the Europeon Theater its was at the very end and Germany had no chance of holding the land they took with or without the help from US forces .
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
Palehose said:
....I happend to see This Forum full of Liberal idiots that needed to be slapped around with some facts....
:mj07: I like this guy.....maybe as much as Manson :mj14:
 

Palehose

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 22, 2005
590
1
0
You keep laughing we will keep winning elections sounds great to me ! Any of you clueless wonders ever think of why the south had been devout blue states since the civil war , but all of the sudden the last 3 elections or so they have become Red states ???? Its because of the liberal morons that stole the once great Democratic party ! Many Thanks guys we needed those states , keep on spewing your only helping us :mj07:

May see ya's on Monday keep up the good work !!!
and thanks again !
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
you seem to enjoy rubbing elections in the faces of democrats more than actually having a healthy, balanced nation. who are you, ann coulter?

you definitely are manson, by the way. either that or they clone you guys better than i realized.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Pale if we didn't kick them out of France, Italy, So Africa just who was going to. They might still be in France today. Maybe we should have let them keep em.
 

ocelot

Registered User
Forum Member
May 21, 2003
1,937
0
0
Mount Shasta
djv,

You are correct about our contribution in WW2 but it was North Africa and not South I believe.

I have to say Russia did a lot of the heavy lifting but probably would not have turned the tide without USA equipment.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
You are correct N Africa. I just don't believe anyone can think England and Russia were goning to defeat Germany.
 

Palehose

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 22, 2005
590
1
0
djv said:
Pale if we didn't kick them out of France, Italy, So Africa just who was going to. They might still be in France today. Maybe we should have let them keep em.

Well DJV why dont you read a little history about what France and The Brits were going to do if they couldnt get the support of US Troops which by the way came pretty close to not happening . I will give you a little hint ....there was an entire plan simular to the D -day operation that would have been put into effect had the US forces not been available.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top