Strong Sagarin Plays (rivalry week)

[Scott4USC]

You still havn't explained where you got all your bogus info on the penn st/wisky game.
-alvarez imposing gag order?
-bernstien playing?
-walk-on lineman?
practice what you preach. gl

:nono: :nono: :nono:

I don't need to explain where I got my info from. I explained why I was betting so much on Wisky. I think my average wager size this year has been around 3-4 units. I put 16 units on Wisconisn and explained EXACTLY why I put that much on them. In my analysis i said I did not guarantee anything. Wisky lost and I lost 8k on the game. I paid the price for being incorrect.

 

[BUCKY1]

so you're betting on wisky because barry imposes a gag order
you're betting because bernstein is playing
you're betting because the healthy d-line is back
all false info
I really don't want to beat a dead horse but I use this site to get reliable info especially on games and teams I don't know a lot about and I'm sure most other players do too. and you just flat out posted crap. you probably know the most here about the trojans but that is about it.

 

[Scott4USC]

so you're betting on wisky because barry imposes a gag order
you're betting because bernstein is playing
you're betting because the healthy d-line is back
all false info
I really don't want to beat a dead horse but I use this site to get reliable info especially on games and teams I don't know a lot about and I'm sure most other players do too. and you just flat out posted crap. you probably know the most here about the trojans but that is about it.

I posted why I was taking Wisconsin. It was all in my analysis. So yes those were major reasons for me backing Wisky. My info was wrong. $hit happens. I won most of my other posted bets to turn a huge profit despite losing big 16 units on Wisky so I was happy. My personal analysis on other games was correct. Guess I relied to heavily on inside info. If you think I am BS, you do not have to read or wager on my plays. Sorry that my Wisky info was incorrect. I paid for it! :cursin: Maybe this is why posters don't post their reasonings behind their plays. People like you.

 

[maverick2112]

:nono: :nono: :nono:

I don't need to explain where I got my info from. I explained why I was betting so much on Wisky. I think my average wager size this year has been around 3-4 units. I put 16 units on Wisconisn and explained EXACTLY why I put that much on them. In my analysis i said I did not guarantee anything. Wisky lost and I lost 8k on the game. I paid the price for being incorrect.

You are never going to live down that pathetic play and all that bs information you posted before the game........noW when it comes tell is why you told us players were playing that didnt........you have nothing to say ...what gives

 

[maverick2112]

I posted why I was taking Wisconsin. It was all in my analysis. So yes those were major reasons for me backing Wisky. My info was wrong. $hit happens. I won most of my other posted bets to turn a huge profit despite losing big 16 units on Wisky so I was happy. My personal analysis on other games was correct. Guess I relied to heavily on inside info. If you think I am BS, you do not have to read or wager on my plays. Sorry that my Wisky info was incorrect. I paid for it! :cursin: Maybe this is why posters don't post their reasonings behind their plays. People like you.

Why dont you tell us where you get this so called INSIDE INFO.......by not telling us you lead a lot of us to believe you JUST MAKE THIS BS UP.......to justify your selection.......

 

[Tduji]

Why dont you tell us where you get this so called INSIDE INFO.......by not telling us you lead a lot of us to believe you JUST MAKE THIS BS UP.......to justify your selection.......

First off I am neither touting nor bashing Scott. But for the love of God, leave the man alone.... I for one like to read his analysis on his games. I cap my own games and like to see if others in this forum agree or disagree and why. I dont think anyone should blindly follow or fade anybodys picks. Just gotta figure if you agree then great... if you dont... so be it. Whether he bets $1 on a game or $1000000 on a game whats it to anyone else ? Units won or lost is more important isnt it ? I myself cannot play for as much per unit as most handicappers here but I have fun with it and try to turn profit. Genuinely hope every capper in this site turns more than 56% a year... GLTA and hopefully we can all get around this senseless and ridiculous bashing of others....

 

[Scott4USC]

Thanks for positive words Tduji.

You are never going to live down that pathetic play and all that bs information you posted before the game........noW when it comes tell is why you told us players were playing that didnt........you have nothing to say ...what gives

Never live down that pathetic play?

Why do posters focus on that one big loss? I had an absolute MONSTER WEEKEND! Why not focus on me going 10-4 ATS? Why not focus on me winning over 9 units profit despite losing a 16 unit wager? Take away the Wisconsin game and I won over 25 units. Why not focus on me digging myself out of a -30 unit hole and now up over 4 units!!!!!!! I am up over 4 units on posted plays despite losing 3 HUGE HUGE DOUBLE DIGIT WAGERS (Louisville, NM, and Wisky) I think that is impressive.

I always reply to anybody who has a question. I try and explain all my big wagers with reasonings WHY I AM betting that team. Never have I been dishonest with my record or anything. Always straightforward. Stop bitching about the Wisky game. My info was wrong and I lost 8k because of that. $hit happens. But I had a monster day. I won around 4.5k but if Wisky covered like I expected, I could have won 20k. But that has been my season all year. I always take big risks when I am really confident on a game.

If you choose to believe I made it up, thats fine. Sorry if I lose credibility with you or anybody else. I admit my Wisky analysis certainly wouldn't earn me any credibility. But I always have and always will lay myself out there at this site. I speak the truth and explain why I like a side. I certainly don't have a history of posting BS.

However, all my "documented" winnings at this site and me getting myself out of a 30+ unit hole should already give me more credibility than I need. You don't see too many posters posting a double digit unit loss record and work their way back to the plus side. I did! I guarantee you I lost 8k on Wisconsin. SO I would highly doubt I was making anything up. I also said I did not guarantee anything in my analysis about the players. I could guarantee stuff about USC but Wisconsin is not my team so I had to rely on others. But the players coming back was not the entire reason for me backing Wisky. I explained everything in my analysis. Barry let me down!

 

[COYOTEBLUE]

GOOD LUCK ON ALL YOUR PLAYS ...

I CAN'T BELIEVE SOMEONE HAVING TO EXPLAIN THEIR PLAYS LIKE THIS ... AS ONE POSTER SAID ...

PLAY IT OR DONT PLAY IT ...

GGGGGEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHH!!!

 

[INtheBLUE]

Scott, I actually said nice things about you and I didnt get a thank you.

Advice: You have explained yourself 800 times, god knows I have had to piddle through everyone of them. Next time some dumbass wants to tell you how to set up your system to pick your games without you paying them for advice, just tell them to :stfu: and read previous posts.

Call it whatever you want, it has hit over 80% for what now, 4 weeks? I'd call it pretty damn nice!!

:mj14:

 

[ShivaShante]

These guys are the type that come to this site, write down a capper's picks, and then play their whole paycheck on what essentially boils down to that person's opinion on the game, and they probably do it without any capping of their own. One day hopefully they will all grow up and become MEN (or women, sorry) who use the advise of experienced cappers (Scott) in addition with their own knowledge to make their own decisions. Then, if they lose, they will hopefully chalk it up as just G-A-M-B-L-I-N-G, and not blame someone :cursin: who is just trying to be helpful.
thanks and gl Scott
glta

 

[ROCKHARD]

Scott,
I for one like to read your analysis and second, I don't see why you keep explaining over and over again the same s#it.If these guys don't understand what your doing then the h#ll with them.You don't have to explain yourself or how you get your info. like you said ,IT'S SOMETHING NEW YOU ARE TRYING OUT,so qiut trying to explain yourself to these idiots and just keep up the good work.Everyday I get on here and you are one of the first post I like to look at. Is this wrong?,not in my opinion.it doesn't mean i am going to play all of your picks,but I like to read your caps and analysis.
KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK.....

 

[Scott4USC]

Thanks for the nice replies. I don't mind answering legit questions. If someone asks something about the system, i don't mind explaining. I prob. should copy and paste explanation to all my threads.

To those who have problem with me. Be a big boy and ignore me OR better yet put me on your ignore list. Simple as that.

If I got no replies or views on my plays, then I wouldn't post it. But since people appreciate it I do it. I hope it has big weekend after starting the week 0-1.

 

[Agent 0659]

Some very good line moves from your original post, I like them even more!!

 

[socrstud]

Scot......new to the forurm and I like your plays...being that you are a USC fan, I dunno if you like Fresno or not? How's your system look for the Fresno game?

 

[skillrules]

Sorry the wheels fell off, my friend.

 

[mw]

Why are "you" telling me how to calculate "my" system?

Your reading comprehension is piss-poor. I didn't tell you how to calculate your system; I told you that a statement you made is false. You said Sagarin had Ohio winning by 2.65.

He didn't. YOU did. Do you understand the difference?

 

[AU2001]

So they are "Sagarin" plays but "your" system. I got it.

 

[dlvlsu]

That spells Fade big time!!