O'Reilly the Coward

[Chadman]

Ed Schultz, although I think you know, is the talk show host that was denied a spot on Armed Forces Radio (PAID FOR BY ALL TAXPAYERS, LIBERALS, TOO, LIKE OUR MILITARY) by conservatives. The only voice they evidently can hear is Rush Drugbaugh. And they are supposedly fighting for equal rights and freedom. Nice.

 

[kosar]

Wayne,

MC did not stretch it much, if at all. I think we can all agree that Murtha advocates us getting out of there as soon as we can. In fact, his comments have kind of spearheaded this momentum to get some sort of plan or timeframe or explanation or something about this war.

So, who exactly is O'Reilly referring to when he says this, and would this not include Murtha? Of course it would.

O'REILLY: These pinheads running around going, "Get out of Iraq now," don't know what they're talking about. These are the same people before Hitler invaded in World War II that were saying, "Ah, he's not such a bad guy." They don't get it.

 

[Chadman]

How would setting my VCR bring O'Reilly more money?

You wouldn't have had such an interest in the show withour Kerry being on. Like many more viewers, which brings in ad $$. I thought you were smarter than this.

Can you imagine the increase in ad cost for a show like that? Sorry, I am in advertising and marketing...I understand what I'm talking about here.

But you know this anyway...just trying to deflect from losing the argument.

 

[CHARLESMANSON]

Ed Schultz, although I think you know, is the talk show host that was denied a spot on Armed Forces Radio (PAID FOR BY ALL TAXPAYERS, LIBERALS, TOO, LIKE OUR MILITARY) by conservatives. The only voice they evidently can hear is Rush Drugbaugh. And they are supposedly fighting for equal rights and freedom. Nice.

News to me but I'll keep an ear out for this guy. Is he a liberal?

 

[CHARLESMANSON]

You wouldn't have had such an interest in the show withour Kerry being on.

What are you talking about? Kerry was never on, that's my point!! He's too scared lol

#1 cable news show in the country and Bill O'Reilly gets the same paycheck weather John Kerry appears or not. Nice try. Keep backpedalling lol.

 

[Chadman]

Do you think that advertising dollars stay the same for every show, every day? Don't you think that more high profile guests generate more money for the network, because of increased viewership and advertiser interest in reaching them?

John Kerry on O'Reilly would bring top dollar from advertisers, making O'Reilly more valuable to the network and more money in the future because of it. They would simply charge more for that, and don't think they wouldn't plan it that way.

So, he gets paid the same...so he doesn't care who he has on the show? He doesn't want or need high profile people on the show? How many talk show folks have just gotten tired and old without the good guests? Nearly all of them. O'Reilly is a product of Ruppert Murdock's money and advertising.

 

[CHARLESMANSON]

Ok dude whatever you win LOL. I guess O'Reilly's $25 Million contract isn't enough for him. The whole point is being missed here.

KERRY IS TOO CHICKEN TO DO AN INTERVIEW WITH O'REILLY....give it your Sheehan spin all you want.

You say Bill O'Reilly needs a John Kerry interview for attention and money???

What a rediculous fukking argument you make but oh well, what do I know. You are the authority on media marketing and salary distribution.Maybe, just maybe, O'Reilly wants to ask John Kerry why he voted to use force in Iraq then voted against the $87 Billion that goes to the troops. Ever thought of that or are you just living in denial?

 

[Chadman]

I see you have a hard time losing arguments. That's understandable. Kerry has no benefit, O'Reilly has all the benefit.

Why did O 'Reilly write a book, then, if the $25 mil was enough?

Simple. Thanks for losing.

Kerry explained the quandary you seem to have missed about the two votes. Not that you would pay attention to that, or accept it.

And so it goes.

 

[CHARLESMANSON]

Why did O 'Reilly write a book, then, if the $25 mil was enough?

Simple. Thanks for losing.

All proceeds from O'Reilly's book go to charity. Same with the stuff he seels on his website.

Now who's losing? you!!! :s4:

 

[Master Capper]

DTB,,

I can tell you point blank that O'Reilly has slammed Murtha very unfairly on his radio show, as I unfortunately have had to hear his garbage for the past two weeks. O'Reilly is one of the worst talk show host commentators that I have ever heard, how this guy talks down to people and criticizes anyone whom disagrees with his ideas is sickening. This guy badgering others about their morales and beliefs is too funny especially since he had to pay off a co-worker that he sexually harassed now thats one upstanding Christian. Now your choice is to throw out your typical Clinton reference on morales which is a typical tactic of conservatives when they can't handle the shortcomings of their idols.

 

[CHARLESMANSON]

Chadman vanished after I taught him a lesson. Cut n Run. :clap:

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

"MC did not stretch it much, if at all"

Don't know how you figure Matt and not blaming MC as much as liberal press. Heller Keller can see it was their intent not to put what he said in context but rather make it appear he was directly referring to Murtha which if you would have saw his remarks backing Murthas service and torching any that would defame his service--you would know his thoughts on Murtha are quite the opposite.
Thses smear sites are noted for there out of context munipulations-half truths-and total lies and you see major media having to make retractions on daily basis trying to get 1st coverage without looking into facts.
When anyone see these half quotes or articles put out there with no link to entire transcript or author you know theres 98% chance your being duped.
We all make mistakes but I think if a person puts something up here they should at least put up link and/or author and let people decide on there own whether it has merit.

 

[Nosigar]

Equating bravery to showing up on a right-wing Fauxnews talk show and having a professional talker shout you down and cut you off as you try to give a differing viewpoint. Hannity is exactly the same...Fauxnews puts up the dorkiest-looking, poorest-communicating people to defend democrats and liberal ideas on these shows, and they can't get an important word in edgewise if they start embarrassing them.

Yeah, O'Reilly and Hannity are real tough guys...I'd love to see them go one on one with an aging John Kerry. He'd have them choking for air in about 10 seconds, I would guess.

You may be right, though I'd hardly consider Faux hard right-wing.

But just imagine the decades that smart conservative folks have endured listening to the big 3 and CNN et al. And you complain about one little network that gives a little more news than just what you want to hear?. Ridiculous. Once again proving the point that commies don't accept other points of view. Anybody who watches FOX is a beer bellied trailer-meister, per you guys. But watching CNN or CBS News, both boring and extremely uninformative, is sophisticated?

You neo-socs are getting a little desperate.

 

[Nosigar]

WHY is you liberals have to resort to this Micheal Moore reporting.

Per your
On Today Show, O?Reilly Compares Murtha With Hitler Sympathizers

I defie you to show me "anywhere" where Oreilly refers to Murtha to Hitler-coward or any negative attribute--I have heard him (not cut and chop interpretations) use nothing but respect in any acknowledgement of Murtha.

Here is his quote in interview--YOUR using to interject Murtha for pinheads.

From Today:

O'REILLY: These pinheads running around going, "Get out of Iraq now," don't know what they're talking about. These are the same people before Hitler invaded in World War II that were saying, "Ah, he's not such a bad guy." They don't get it.

Also link to video of entire segment--show us where he mentions Burtha
http://mediamatters.org/items/200511300009

Your opening line--
I just don't get what makes guys like Bill O'Reilly want or feel the need to attack guys like Murtha that have served our country

To that I ask you is it ignorance that you can't tell the diff from liberal interpretations and fact-- or is it you can but just have agenda---

Now you got 2 choices you can gain some credibilty by showing us "factually"one quote where Oreilly even remotely defames Murtha or you can back out like a sand crab and come back with more liberal opinionated opinions to support previous spin.

Exactly what I wanted to say. I mean these libs don't even know how to tell the truth. Every single word they say is "untrue" or a "lliberal" interpretation of some fact.

It's not that you liberals are getting desperate, I believe you folks have always been so false and fake. It's really sickeining and disrespectuful.
Geeze' it's like spoiled little kids!! Grow up! :mj16:

 

[kosar]

Wayne and Nosigar,

While it's admirable that you guys would like a little truth in reporting, do you have any comments on Manson spamming the board with quotes taken out of context with no link or reference or inclusion of the rest of the speeches? I guess that's ok, huh?

How about throwing out glowing numbers regarding amounts of trained Iraqis and all sorts of great stuff, with no source other than 'W said it?' No problem with that when it supports(sic) your views.

 

[Nosigar]

Wayne and Nosigar,

While it's admirable that you guys would like a little truth in reporting, do you have any comments on Manson spamming the board with quotes taken out of context with no link or reference or inclusion of the rest of the speeches? I guess that's ok, huh?

How about throwing out glowing numbers regarding amounts of trained Iraqis and all sorts of great stuff, with no source other than 'W said it?' No problem with that when it supports(sic) your views.

Matt, i don't read Manson's links.

As for "W" being a source of info, you may be right. After all, presidents can't be trusted. "I did not have sexual relations with that woman.... Ms. Lewinsky".

Yeah, I know, another Clinton thing. But it was just too easy.

 

[kosar]

Sigar,

You have 35,000 more Clinton references until you catch up to Wayne, so we'll give you a pass.

 

[Clem D]

Matt, i don't read Manson's links.

As for "W" being a source of info, you may be right. After all, presidents can't be trusted. "I did not have sexual relations with that woman.... Ms. Lewinsky".

Yeah, I know, another Clinton thing. But it was just too easy.

You dont read Manson? Nosigar you truly are a smart man and a role model to us all. Maybe if we all put him on ignore he will go away,

 

[djv]

Clem D we do need a laugh now and then. So we may need to keep-em around . ?????

 

[Nosigar]

Clem D we do need a laugh now and then. So we may need to keep-em around . ?????

Actually, djv, that's what we got you for. And it might be even funnier if I understood what you were saying at least half of the time. :s2: