no tzu....hussein`s entitled to a defense....
my comments were in regards to clark`s penchant for defending genocidal mass murderers,war criminals,extreme nut cases and in general,anyone that basically hates america....
he attended a human rights conference in baghdad,i think in "98"..... where in his keynote speech he pointed out how "the governments of the rich nations, primarily the u.s., england and france," dominated the wording of the "universal declaration of human rights", which showed "little concern for economic, social and cultural rights." .......
lol....the social and cultural rights claimed by his iraqi hosts include the right to hang opponents in public at the airport, or poison thousands of kurds and torture and execute any opponent of the regime...... ....
from all reports,he`s a sham of an attorney...
malpractice shysters(i.e. ambulance chasers)?.......i don`t think,in most cases,their motives are any more noble than your average defense attorney....
unfortunately,the way the system`s set up,they`re a necessity.....
also unfortunately,there are so many stupid people that don`t have a clue in our society,that the jury system has become laughable...
an example of the mentality of some juries...
""First WTC bombing: terrorists 32% to blame, building owners 68%....
Twelve years after the event, a jury finds someone to blame for the Islamist van-bomb attack that killed six, injured nearly 1,000, and caused costly business dislocation (Sept. 21, 2005, Dec. 5, 2004, Oct. 12-14, 2001). The culprit? The Port Authority, an agency whose losses are likely to be ultimately borne by New York and New Jersey taxpayers, motorists and air travelers:
The jury voted unanimously that the Port Authority [then-owner of the WTC] was negligent. It found the authority 68 percent at fault for the bombing, while the terrorists who carried it out were 32 percent at fault.
Mr. [David J.] Dean, the plaintiffs' lawyer, said that because the jury apportioned more than half the blame to the Port Authority, the agency will have to pay 100 percent of any damages for pain and suffering, the so-called non-economic damages, that might be awarded.
Regardless of how the blame was shared, the Port Authority would have to pay 100 percent of any economic damages, like lost business, he said."""
now,i understand,there`s a class action lawsuit against soft drink manufacturers for putting soft drink vending machines in schools....
lmao....i shouldn`t laugh...it`s downright pitiful...
