roughing kicker you kidding

west coast guru

Registered User
Forum Member
May 18, 2001
1,696
1
0
How is that a roughing the kicker you kidding me....what a joke.....now tampa had no reason to rush the kicker but they did and that is not roughing
 

west coast guru

Registered User
Forum Member
May 18, 2001
1,696
1
0
just hate to see calls like that in a big game.....it turned the whole game around on that call.....
 

west coast guru

Registered User
Forum Member
May 18, 2001
1,696
1
0
just a shame that a lot of nfl games are turned on questionable calls.........they call that running into the kicker and it is probably 7-0 at the half....just so hard to put any money for me on nfl games when the flag controls the game.....stick with college hoops and football where one call is not so pivotal like the nfl.....league so balanced one call is huge
 

Smitty

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 5, 2005
7,387
1,974
113
Upstate NY
agreed. the guy tripped over his teammate and stumbled into the punter. pathetic call. HUGE momentum swing. :cursin: my under was looking great.
 

johnnyonthespot

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 6, 2002
1,459
18
38
46
Cottonwood Heights, UT
Nick, you can claim the call didn't matter for the side but it certainly matters for the total. As this is a gambling forum and not a sports forum, the total is every bit as important as the side winner. That call mattered.
 

west coast guru

Registered User
Forum Member
May 18, 2001
1,696
1
0
that call changed everything 7-0 is nothing and the style of game the bucs want.....keep it close and play field position.....they were doing a great job.....offense is not that good but they wanted to control the clock and keep it low scoring....they had accomplished everything they wanted and then a bullshit roughing the kicker call......7-0 a lot better than 21-0....you stupid or what
 

lowell

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 6, 2003
9,177
89
48
he hit him when he was stretched out. i thought the call was right. it should be 15 yds for being stupid
 

west coast guru

Registered User
Forum Member
May 18, 2001
1,696
1
0
being stupid you are right but that does not justify 15 yards.....hit your tivo and watch it again lowell he was not stretched out and got barely touched on side.....i think that would be a definition of running into a kicker or rather tapping a kicker
 

OKD

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 6, 2002
311
0
0
55
It definitely should have been running into the kicker.

Unbelievable.

I FOCKING HATE STUPID REFS. :cursin:
 

TouchdownJesus

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 13, 2004
6,140
75
48
North Carolina
I think you could argue the call either way. Prob. should have been running into and not roughing...
Here's the thing I hate. If Pats had done it, it would have DEFINITELY been running into.
Pats are good, but they get all the breaks. Little things that add up. A call here, a no-call there. Then the calls sort of even up when they don't really matter. Like the late hit on Simms in 2nd half. That was bullshit but game was already decided.
If you say Pats get more calls, they can point to that.
Very similar to Duke basketball.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top