Media Bias Is Real, Finds UCLA Political Scientist

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
Media Bias Is Real, Finds UCLA Political Scientist


Date: December 14, 2005
Contact: Meg Sullivan ( msullivan@support.ucla.edu )
Phone: 310-825-1046



While the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal is conservative, the newspaper's news pages are liberal, even more liberal than The New York Times. The Drudge Report may have a right-wing reputation, but it leans left. Coverage by public television and radio is conservative compared to the rest of the mainstream media. Meanwhile, almost all major media outlets tilt to the left.

These are just a few of the surprising findings from a UCLA-led study, which is believed to be the first successful attempt at objectively quantifying bias in a range of media outlets and ranking them accordingly.

"I suspected that many media outlets would tilt to the left because surveys have shown that reporters tend to vote more Democrat than Republican," said Tim Groseclose, a UCLA political scientist and the study's lead author. "But I was surprised at just how pronounced the distinctions are."

"Overall, the major media outlets are quite moderate compared to members of Congress, but even so, there is a quantifiable and significant bias in that nearly all of them lean to the left," said co‑author Jeffrey Milyo, University of Missouri economist and public policy scholar.

The results appear in the latest issue of the Quarterly Journal of Economics, which will become available in mid-December.

Groseclose and Milyo based their research on a standard gauge of a lawmaker's support for liberal causes. Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) tracks the percentage of times that each lawmaker votes on the liberal side of an issue. Based on these votes, the ADA assigns a numerical score to each lawmaker, where "100" is the most liberal and "0" is the most conservative. After adjustments to compensate for disproportionate representation that the Senate gives to low‑population states and the lack of representation for the District of Columbia, the average ADA score in Congress (50.1) was assumed to represent the political position of the average U.S. voter.

Groseclose and Milyo then directed 21 research assistants ? most of them college students ? to scour U.S. media coverage of the past 10 years. They tallied the number of times each media outlet referred to think tanks and policy groups, such as the left-leaning NAACP or the right-leaning Heritage Foundation.

Next, they did the same exercise with speeches of U.S. lawmakers. If a media outlet displayed a citation pattern similar to that of a lawmaker, then Groseclose and Milyo's method assigned both a similar ADA score.

"A media person would have never done this study," said Groseclose, a UCLA political science professor, whose research and teaching focuses on the U.S. Congress. "It takes a Congress scholar even to think of using ADA scores as a measure. And I don't think many media scholars would have considered comparing news stories to congressional speeches."

Of the 20 major media outlets studied, 18 scored left of center, with CBS' "Evening News," The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times ranking second, third and fourth most liberal behind the news pages of The Wall Street Journal.

Only Fox News' "Special Report With Brit Hume" and The Washington Times scored right of the average U.S. voter.

The most centrist outlet proved to be the "NewsHour With Jim Lehrer." CNN's "NewsNight With Aaron Brown" and ABC's "Good Morning America" were a close second and third.

"Our estimates for these outlets, we feel, give particular credibility to our efforts, as three of the four moderators for the 2004 presidential and vice-presidential debates came from these three news outlets ? Jim Lehrer, Charlie Gibson and Gwen Ifill," Groseclose said. "If these newscasters weren't centrist, staffers for one of the campaign teams would have objected and insisted on other moderators."

The fourth most centrist outlet was "Special Report With Brit Hume" on Fox News, which often is cited by liberals as an egregious example of a right-wing outlet. While this news program proved to be right of center, the study found ABC's "World News Tonight" and NBC's "Nightly News" to be left of center. All three outlets were approximately equidistant from the center, the report found.

"If viewers spent an equal amount of time watching Fox's 'Special Report' as ABC's 'World News' and NBC's 'Nightly News,' then they would receive a nearly perfectly balanced version of the news," said Milyo, an associate professor of economics and public affairs at the University of Missouri at Columbia.

Five news outlets ? "NewsHour With Jim Lehrer," ABC's "Good Morning America," CNN's "NewsNight With Aaron Brown," Fox News' "Special Report With Brit Hume" and the Drudge Report ? were in a statistical dead heat in the race for the most centrist news outlet. Of the print media, USA Today was the most centrist.

An additional feature of the study shows how each outlet compares in political orientation with actual lawmakers. The news pages of The Wall Street Journal scored a little to the left of the average American Democrat, as determined by the average ADA score of all Democrats in Congress (85 versus 84). With scores in the mid-70s, CBS' "Evening News" and The New York Times looked similar to Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., who has an ADA score of 74.

Most of the outlets were less liberal than Lieberman but more liberal than former Sen. John Breaux, D-La. Those media outlets included the Drudge Report, ABC's "World News Tonight," NBC's "Nightly News," USA Today, NBC's "Today Show," Time magazine, U.S. News & World Report, Newsweek, NPR's "Morning Edition," CBS' "Early Show" and The Washington Post.

Since Groseclose and Milyo were more concerned with bias in news reporting than opinion pieces, which are designed to stake a political position, they omitted editorials and Op‑Eds from their tallies. This is one reason their study finds The Wall Street Journal more liberal than conventional wisdom asserts.

Another finding that contradicted conventional wisdom was that the Drudge Report was slightly left of center.

"One thing people should keep in mind is that our data for the Drudge Report was based almost entirely on the articles that the Drudge Report lists on other Web sites," said Groseclose. "Very little was based on the stories that Matt Drudge himself wrote. The fact that the Drudge Report appears left of center is merely a reflection of the overall bias of the media."

Yet another finding that contradicted conventional wisdom relates to National Public Radio, often cited by conservatives as an egregious example of a liberal news outlet. But according to the UCLA-University of Missouri study, it ranked eighth most liberal of the 20 that the study examined.

"By our estimate, NPR hardly differs from the average mainstream news outlet," Groseclose said. "Its score is approximately equal to those of Time, Newsweek and U.S. News & World Report and its score is slightly more conservative than The Washington Post's. If anything, government‑funded outlets in our sample have a slightly lower average ADA score (61), than the private outlets in our sample (62.8)."

The researchers took numerous steps to safeguard against bias ? or the appearance of same ? in the work, which took close to three years to complete. They went to great lengths to ensure that as many research assistants supported Democratic candidate Al Gore in the 2000 election as supported President George Bush. They also sought no outside funding, a rarity in scholarly research.

"No matter the results, we feared our findings would've been suspect if we'd received support from any group that could be perceived as right- or left-leaning, so we consciously decided to fund this project only with our own salaries and research funds that our own universities provided," Groseclose said.

The results break new ground.

"Past researchers have been able to say whether an outlet is conservative or liberal, but no one has ever compared media outlets to lawmakers," Groseclose said. "Our work gives a precise characterization of the bias and relates it to known commodity ? politicians."

-UCLA-
 

dawgball

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2000
10,652
39
48
50
Very interesting, AR. I'm sure there are going to be people that tear this post to pieces.

I feel that I agree with most of what it says. I have always felt that NPR was less "liberal" than it is accused by the right. I also feel that Fox, overall, is less "conservative" than it is accused by the left.

I noticed that CNBC was not mentioned in the article. I always feel like they give a pretty centrist view of the current state of the American economy and other news.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Thanks, will read more completely, later.

One thing I'd like to point out...I would assume the print and broadcast journalists at a high level to generally be more liberal. Everyone knows it takes a lot of intelligence to go to college, major in English and communications, be hired by major news organizations, and flourish. I've always found it a little humorous that conservatives squawk about left bias in one of the areas where intelligence and the ability to communicate go hand in hand as a requirement to really be successful.

I'm kind of kidding, but not too much.
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
Chadman said:
Everyone knows it takes a lot of intelligence to go to college, major in English and communications, be hired by major news organizations, and flourish. .

:mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:

yeah those English and Communication/Journalist majors are where the brain trust is

could probably handle 4 years of curriculum in 4 months when i was in junior high
 

Palehose

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 22, 2005
590
1
0
Come on folks of course its left wing Bias and your article dosent even touch on the absolute biggest reason as to why its leans so far left . Can anybody tell me why ? Its very logical to say the least .
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
dr. freeze said:
:mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:

yeah those English and Communication/Journalist majors are where the brain trust is

could probably handle 4 years of curriculum in 4 months when i was in junior high

I forgot you were so smart, Freeze, which is difficult to do since you feel compelled to remind everyone of it at the drop of a hat.

Funny how someone who communicates so abruptly and suck-sinctly makes fun of English majors.

I stand by my comment. People who have taken the time to appreciate the english language and choose to use it so successfully are probably good stewards of communicating current events. I understand how this could be a touchy subject of supporters of our current President, however.

Wee sertenlie no how gud hee tawks.
 

Palehose

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 22, 2005
590
1
0
So Chad you cant figure out the easy reason as to why the media has been so historically Liberal ??? it so easy !
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
I confess, palehose, I do not know what you think the reason for that is. Please share.

Kosar, thanks for the signature update of Larry's quote. I think I know what measures he and his wife have taken to avoid pregnancy. I'm guessing she won't have sex with him...

:mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:
 

Palehose

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 22, 2005
590
1
0
Well News Flash ! The reason and I mean true reason the media has been so historically Liberal is money and power of course . The only ones to ever take money and power away from the media has been no other than the Consevatives ....yep we are the only ones that sometimes feel the need for Censorship . That one word right their is the Media's demise a true threat to all their money and power . The last thing on earth they want is go back to the days when they werent allowed to be on the front lines of a war or to be censored as such as to controll their programing in any way shape or form . Right now in these times they have run amok and are reaping profits at an all time high . They are welcome all over the place even were they shouldnt be . Last thing in the world they want to see now is some conservative telling them they shouldnt be on the front line of the war or that South Park is inapporpriate programming . They have never been this powerful and dont plan on giving up that power anytime soon .
They will continue to shun conservatives because its the only threat they have to worry about .
 

Palehose

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 22, 2005
590
1
0
kosar said:
Teach us, Obi-Wan.


Really bro for someone who wouldnt know the 1st thing to do with a women or sex futher than your right hand you really should make a new sig . I stated the Iran Contra thing wrong go back to that one it makes ya's feel good I was wrong once here and gives ya a little confidence and believe me you guys need it . Go do something challanging like casting a vote :mj07: :mj07:

P.S. your still my Fav Dimpled Chad ! Merry Christmas !! :mj14:
 

dawgball

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2000
10,652
39
48
50
I think it's a stretch to say that journalists are generally of high intelligence. At least any higher than any other professional job. They just enjoy the spotlight and think of their opinion as gospel most of the time.

This applies to whatever the journalist's political stance.

There are very few real journalists today. Everything is an op-ed piece.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Palehose, I think you are safe with that last post. I don't know how anyone could really know what you were posting in that one. I get the jist of it, but pretty hard to zero in on some of those essay entrees.

Interesting that you say that the biased left wing media has never been this powerful and don't plan on giving that up any time soon. Traditional newspaper circulations are down (left wing bias-controlled, right?). From EVERYTHING I've read of late, network news ratings are way down, and cable news ratings are way up. And what cable news channel garners the highest ratings? That's right, Fox News. Owned and operated by one of the upper 1% of the upper 1%, Rupert Murdoch. The administration, senate and congress are controlled by conservatives. Am I missing something here?

Or, more likely, are you?
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
we have a grand jury investigating valerie plame....thanks to the media scrutiny....

we`ll have an investigation on bush monitoring calls from al qaeda operatives...from inside the country to foreign lands...or vice versa...

but,nation states that are helping the u.s. on the q.t.(allowing operations and prisoner transfers) are outted by the media.....this is secret intelligence,btw....compromising these countries....and making them reticent to help in future situations,,,

and even more egregiously,the media outting top secret monitoring of these phone calls from our enemy...into or out of the country..


not within the country...an important distinction...i know i i haven`t called afghanistan,syria or indonesia recently....

and no mention of an investigation on this....

the valerie plame affair...in comparison to our monitoring enemy phone conversations from abroad into this country....is a pimple on an elephant`s ass...

this is about 1,000 times more important than plame`s lame ass...

even more agregiously,newspapers leaking secret government counter-terrorism strategies is absolutely frightening...

no investigation on that,nyt`s?....

we`re trying to keep a catastrophe from happening......

the media and some congressmen are working actively to subvert our counter-terroism strategies.....

if there`s proof that bush is spying on you and i...then let`s hear about it.....

but,i don`t think that`s going to prove to be the case...

gimme a fricking break...

it`s o.k. for bill clinton,though....even before we got hit with a cataclysmic event like 9/11....

see below...
 
Last edited:

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
and btw...i hate bringing clinton up...i don`t have an axe to grind with him....but.....

the nyt`s lies again....where was the furor over clinton`s actions?....not to mention all those secret files on enemies of his administration that found their way into the white house?....

double standadrd???

whattaya think?


Clinton did it first!

Sunday, Dec. 18, 2005 10:10 p.m. EST
Clinton NSA Eavesdropped on U.S. Calls

""During the 1990’s under President Clinton, the National Security Agency monitored millions of private phone calls placed by U.S. citizens and citizens of other countries under a super secret program code-named Echelon.

On Friday, the New York Times suggested that the Bush administration has instituted “a major shift in American intelligence-gathering practices” when it “secretly authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States to search for evidence of terrorist activity without [obtaining] court-approved warrants.”

But in fact, the NSA had been monitoring private telephone conversations on a much larger scale throughout the 1990s - all of it done without a court order, let alone a catalyst like the 9/11 attacks.

In February 2000, for instance, CBS “60 Minutes” correspondent Steve Kroft introduced a report on the Clinton-era spy program by noting:

“If you made a phone call today or sent an e-mail to a friend, there’s a good chance what you said or wrote was captured and screened by the country’s largest intelligence agency. The top-secret Global Surveillance Network is called Echelon, and it’s run by the National Security Agency.”

NSA computers, said Kroft, “capture virtually every electronic conversation around the world.”

Echelon expert Mike Frost, who spent 20 years as a spy for the Canadian equivalent of the National Security Agency, told “60 Minutes” that the agency was monitoring “everything from data transfers to cell phones to portable phones to baby monitors to ATMs.”

Mr. Frost detailed activities at one unidentified NSA installation, telling “60 Minutes” that agency operators “can listen in to just about anything” - while Echelon computers screen phone calls for key words that might indicate a terrorist threat.

The “60 Minutes” report also spotlighted Echelon critic, then-Rep. Bob Barr, who complained that the project as it was being implemented under Clinton “engages in the interception of literally millions of communications involving United States citizens.”

One Echelon operator working in Britain told “60 Minutes” that the NSA had even monitored and tape recorded the conversations of the late Sen. Strom Thurmond.

Still, the Times repeatedly insisted on Friday that NSA surveillance under Bush had been unprecedented, at one point citing anonymously an alleged former national security official who claimed: “This is really a sea change. It’s almost a mainstay of this country that the NSA only does foreign searches.” ""

:nooo:
 

Palehose

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 22, 2005
590
1
0
Chadman said:
Palehose, I think you are safe with that last post. I don't know how anyone could really know what you were posting in that one. I get the jist of it, but pretty hard to zero in on some of those essay entrees.

Interesting that you say that the biased left wing media has never been this powerful and don't plan on giving that up any time soon. Traditional newspaper circulations are down (left wing bias-controlled, right?). From EVERYTHING I've read of late, network news ratings are way down, and cable news ratings are way up. And what cable news channel garners the highest ratings? That's right, Fox News. Owned and operated by one of the upper 1% of the upper 1%, Rupert Murdoch. The administration, senate and congress are controlled by conservatives. Am I missing something here?

Or, more likely, are you?


LOL

1. Yes Newpaper circulation is down but Internet and cable is up Media is Media bro and the power they wield also lies in not being Censored so maybe your not fully understanding ?

2. The media being left wing bias only means they try to get Americans to believe in that BS it dosent mean they will ...hence the high ratings on Fox. The country has many conservatives and their tired of the mainstream media's left wing bias why is that so hard for you to take in ?

3. Yep your missing the fact that Congress consists of Reps and Senators please pay attention to the history of your country ! The conservative Republicants cannot behave conservatively or they lose their jobs because of the left wing media . Imagine what the Media would do to a true conservative that wanted to eliminate welfare programs .....please dont be so gulible it would be political suicide and you know it :cursin: so we are now stuck with people who cannot vote for what they believe in . :cursin:
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
I would also criticize this going on under Clinton's watch if he authorized it. It could definitely lead to abuse of power. Criticism for one, is good enough for the other. He should have gone through proper channels and done exactly what Bush is being criticized for. I don't know anything about the sources listed in this post, of course. The main guy apparently worked for the Canadian government, so not sure what to make of that. Bush personally admitted that he okayed the monitoring of citizens, so that's a pretty direct source.
 

Palehose

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 22, 2005
590
1
0
Now you have lost me compleatly I think you miss posted in the wrong thread ? This one is Media bias . which is a no brainer for 30 or more years now probably a lot longer they were just so censored it wasent as evident.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top