Halftime Thread
- Thread starter Theboundbook
- Start date
BET ID=37228755
Straight Wager 12/23/05 00:21 ET
100.00/90.91 Result: Pending
2Navy (2ndHalf)
2ColoradoSt (2ndHalf) 12/23/05 (01:00 ET)
Over 30
WINNER
Straight Wager 12/23/05 00:21 ET
100.00/90.91 Result: Pending
2Navy (2ndHalf)
2ColoradoSt (2ndHalf) 12/23/05 (01:00 ET)
Over 30
WINNER
Last edited:
40025369-1 12/23/2005 0:28 AM Total 110.00 100.00 Football - 357 Navy/Colorado State over 30 -110 for 2nd Half
40025432-1 12/23/2005 0:29 AM Parlay 50.00 116.88 Football - 357 Navy -? -130 for 2nd Half
Football - 357 Navy/Colorado State over 30 -110 for 2nd Half
Football - 357 Navy/Colorado State over 30 -110 for 2nd Half
Kinda like the Under 30. Navy will use a bunch more runs up the middle & work the clock much harder in the 2nd half....
MY BAD!!!
MY BAD!!!
Good call on the OVER!!! These Clowns play no freaking DEEE. STATE has no DEEEE!! MY bad!
Jersey
MY BAD!!!
Good call on the OVER!!! These Clowns play no freaking DEEE. STATE has no DEEEE!! MY bad!
Jersey
PITIFUL
PITIFUL
My 9 year could throw a TD against both DEFENSES. I am SERIOUS- the boy has GAME!!!!
JERSEY
PITIFUL
My 9 year could throw a TD against both DEFENSES. I am SERIOUS- the boy has GAME!!!!
JERSEY
wow, that was a serious phuck job I just took on that second half bet......unreal, an obvious TD for Colorado St. taken away at the end and then they don't even review...whatever. typical BS!!
congrats navy second halfers!
congrats navy second halfers!
mcity:
whats sad is that the booth reviews tons of plays that have no business being reviewed, where its basically a waste of time and energy because the play in question is so blatantly obvious. then in that case, the receiver was in bounds with room to spare (and two officials staring at the play) and they not only miss the call, but dont review it. sure the TD ultimately doesnt matter but theres something to be said for the integrity of the game
whats sad is that the booth reviews tons of plays that have no business being reviewed, where its basically a waste of time and energy because the play in question is so blatantly obvious. then in that case, the receiver was in bounds with room to spare (and two officials staring at the play) and they not only miss the call, but dont review it. sure the TD ultimately doesnt matter but theres something to be said for the integrity of the game
gman,
that is exactly what I was going to write.....what is the point of having review if you aren't going to use it regardless of time and situation.....yes the TD wouldn't have mattered in the outcome but like you said, where is the integrity? where is doing chit the right way? if they are going to be subjective on when to use that review then phucking scrap it because that is flat out BS! I've seen worse blow-outs than that....with less time left in the game where the guys in the review booth are sitting with hard-ons waiting to make a decision on something. Good luck tomorrow gman.
that is exactly what I was going to write.....what is the point of having review if you aren't going to use it regardless of time and situation.....yes the TD wouldn't have mattered in the outcome but like you said, where is the integrity? where is doing chit the right way? if they are going to be subjective on when to use that review then phucking scrap it because that is flat out BS! I've seen worse blow-outs than that....with less time left in the game where the guys in the review booth are sitting with hard-ons waiting to make a decision on something. Good luck tomorrow gman.
gman2 said:
What's sad is that there is something to be said about Navy independant conference and there strenght of Schedule, but then again who the heck am I??????????????/ just JOE SMOE
