VY performance put in perspective....

3 Seconds

Fcuk Frist
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2004
6,706
16
0
Marlton, NJ
LINK

January 4th, 2006

Rose Bowl - Texas 41 ... USC 38
By Matthew Zemek

In a once-in-a-lifetime national championship game, Vince Young became a once-in-a-lifetime college football legend.

Of all the ways to put the 2006 Rose Bowl into perspective, that is the foremost statement one can make after seeing a game from the gods, and a Texas football hero for the ages.

Understand this: in contemporary American life, there exists a widespread and unwelcome tendency to view contemporary sporting events more favorably than great sports moments from the past. Every remotely close or exciting championship game is viewed as an instant classic. Every new college football powerhouse is viewed as the best team of all time. Events that happened more than ten to fifteen years ago (in other words, the 1980s or earlier) are forgotten and relegated to the trash bin of history. This inclination to disregard the past, and ignore over 100 years of college football history, is shameful.

Some examples: the 2003 Oklahoma Sooners were once viewed as one of the greatest college football teams of all time. Then they lost the Big XII title game to Kansas State. Some might view the 2003 Fiesta Bowl as the greatest college football game ever. True, that game was theatrical and dramatic, but far better punch-counterpunch football games have been played through the years. And ESPN joined the act the past week with its stupid polls involving the greatest college football teams of all time. Great teams such as the 1972 USC Trojans and the 1945 Army squad weren't included on the short list. Memories are short in America today, but college football is a sport where history looms large, and never larger than in the Rose Bowl, the great old stadium in the shadows of the San Gabriel Mountains.

And so it must be said: if a game and a player are going to make a legendary mark on college football, the Granddaddy demands only the very best. Close games aren't great just because they're close. Greater-than-great players don't just win games, they win games by dominating and seizing the spotlight in unforgettable ways.

On January 4, 2006, the Texas Longhorns and USC Trojans didn't just play a close game; they staged a classic that was worthy of the overwhelming, even suffocating, hype. And amidst the many football players who fashioned remarkable and dazzling plays, Vince Young became the biggest man on the field. If you saw what VY did to win Texas' 800th game and its first national title since 1969, no words could possibly do justice to the mastery, magic and magnitude of No. 10's performance. If you didn't see Vince Young's heroics in Pasadena--and you care about college football--get a game tape from someone... for any price. Why? Because in a time when hyperbole comes easily, and exaggeration is so ridiculously commonplace, it is entirely fair and legitimate to say the following: Vince Young is easily the greatest single player in the history of the Rose Bowl (a mouthful of a statement in its own right), and likely the owner of the greatest single-game performance in the 137-year history of Division I-A college football.

To be fair to the men whose names belong to the past--Red Grange and Anthony Davis; Archie Griffin and Tommie Frazier; Ron Vander Kelen and Tom Clements, among hundreds of others--the college football community must not forget those who established a name for this sport and then sustained it over the long march of time. But in the final game of the 2005 college football season, a long way from 1869 and that first game between Rutgers and Princeton, it is hard to argue with the singlehanded brilliance and indomitable will of Texas' swashbuckling quarterback. VY's performance was so good that a Young man seemed to eclipse old legends with each yard he gained, each USC tackler he shook off. And if the raw quality of his effort wasn't awesome enough, consider the more cosmic connections involved in Vince Young's triumph over Troy. Yes, as good as the merits of your effort might be, you need a touch of the poetic and the amazing to have a game better than any other college football player who has ever lived, and VY has those cosmic kinds of connections.

Consider: this now makes two straight Rose Bowls that VY has almost singlehandedly won. Okay, maybe that doesn't blow you away. But we're just warming up here.

Try this on for size: Vince Young wound up scoring the winning touchdown near the same pylon of the same end zone at the same south end of the Rose Bowl stadium where he scored his final (and go-ahead) touchdown against Michigan the year before. What's more is that Young scored in much the same fashion as he did against the Wolverines: he dropped back to pass, then saw the play break down, then turned to his right while a number of defensive linemen desperately pawed at his feet, and then bolted to paydirt inside the pylon. When one man destroys two Rose Bowl opponents in the same way, with the same level of astonishing ease, on the same spot on the field, in two consecutive years, you realize just how great Vince Young is. For two full years now, defensive coordinators have tried to scheme, plan and adjust to stop him. They've failed. They've failed not because their scheme is bad or their concept is poor. They've failed because Vince Young has proven to be above and beyond the ability of defenses to stop him, especially late in games when opposing defenses are tired. It's just that simple. When one man looms that large in the Granddaddy in consecutive years, capping a national championship season with a jawdropping peformance against a celebrated defending champ that didn't play poorly, hyperbole turns into honest, dead-on analysis: Vince Young played the greatest game ever in college football history.

Still not con-Vinced? Fine. This is a weighty historical argument that demands a lot of proof. Here's more evidence:

Matt Leinart entered this game with a chance to win three national titles (yes, LSU, you shared one of them) and become, arguably, the greatest quarterback in college football history (after all, how many quarterbacks could have shared that distinction?). Moreover, Leinart played a second half befitting a legend after a shaky first half in which he threw one pick and nearly had a few other balls intercepted. Yes, in that second half, Leinart threw the ball better than he ever has in his storied USC career, repeatedly hitting Dwayne Jarrett (who stepped up admirably after an inconsistent regular season) to complement LenDale White's awesome power running. Leinart entered the game as a legend, and played like a college football immortal throughout a glorious second half.

And Vince Young easily dwarfed anything and everything Matt Leinart did.

While USC had multiple heroes, and while Texas' gutsy, gritty defense had to make an unforgettable 4th and short stand with 2:09 left to give VY his final chance at glory, history will rightly regard this game as the story of how one man wouldn't let his team lose. That man was not Leinart, who refused to bow to Notre Dame in college football's other legendary contest from this now-completed season. No, that man was Vince Young, the non-Heisman winner who outdueled the two trophy-holders on the opposite side of the field. It wasn't that Leinart played poorly, and it wasn't as though Bush didn't wow the throng of nearly 94,000 with his spectacular touchdown run in the fourth quarter. No, while USC's legends played really well, Vince Young played on another planet.

From every conceivable angle, from every legitimate historical perspective, VY's masterpiece in the 2006 Rose Bowl really does hold up under scrutiny as the greatest single-game college football performance of all time. And as a result of Young's singular display of gridiron heroism, Mack Brown and the Texas Longhorns are now national champions for the first time since the Darrell Royal era.



:mj14:
 

CHERRYMAN

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 3, 2005
12
0
0
GO HORNS

GO HORNS

:clap: :clap: :clap:

Thank you for your justified glorification of the best football player in college in 2005. He did not win the HEISMAN :cursin: , but now everyone in the world knows who the best player in NCAA was in 2005.

We in TX are praying that he returns to UT for another NC - but he deserves every accolade and all of the millions his performances throughout 2005 have earned him.

Vince Young is also a humble man who gave all credit to his team mates for his historic year and showed no ego after the game.

Congrats to UT and VY as NATIONAL CHAMPIONS - they deserve it more than any other team.
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
Why is VY the best player in the NCAA after the Rose Bowl?

He was the best player on the field that night but to be the best player in the NCAA you have to factor in ALL games played.

I think there be a lot of people say VY after the RB but I think majority still feel Reggie Bush is better than VY.

Remember, Texas O is run through VY. USC O is run through everyone. Much easier for VY to run with the ball from QB spot vs Bush to run the ball from handoff. A lot of VY highlights are off broken plays.

Something I was thinking about. How would VY perform in the USC offense. Would it be better than it is now? Before the RB I thought no way would I trade Leinart. But in CFB, a mobile QB is scary. Imagine YOUNG and BUSH in backfield together?

:scared :scared :scared
 

BUCKY1

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,541
6
0
Wisconsin
not going to debate who is better, but VY did a lot of the work himself, whereas USC had a lot of weapons.
 

BleedDodgerBlue

Admin
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2004
7,383
82
0
49
los angeles
based on the voting for the heisman before the bowl games i think reggie bush should have won, or at least you really can't fault voters for voting for him. he really is an exceptional college player. i think his biggest problem heading to sundays is his durability. i just don't see him as a 3 down back.

maybe vince young was the best player in college this year. maybe he wasn't. but the biggest problem with the heisman is their wanting to have it voted on before the bowl games. they will say that its so players not in a bowl get just as much a chance as those in bowls, but when was the last time a player not in a bowl won it? has it ever happened?

i dont' have a problem with bush winning it. i have a problem with the heisman being voted for before the bowl games. not a lot of people got to see texas play a lot this year outside of the south. regionally they always played in time slots where other regions were airing their games. pac-10 played a lot of night games which the whole country could see.

vote on the award after the games. then vince would have had a shot. it definitely would have been closer. if you are going to judge a persons performance on how they do against inferior teams in their conference, than its silly. you should base it upon how they perform on the big stage against equal opponents. if you include the rose bowl, bush loses votes for that stupid lateral and vince wins votes for an outstanding performance. pre-game i would vote for bush if i had one, and post game when it mattered i would vote for young. you have to include the biggest games when everything is on the line and one shined and one didn't. in such a close race, the biggest and best performances should matter and the heisman is stupid for not taking it into consideration.

gl
 

Sun Tzu

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 10, 2003
6,197
9
0
Houston, Texas
BDB,

All these kind of votes are done terribly. Pro Bowl selections with 3 games left to play? The announced Butkus finalists 3 weeks into the season - it is crazy.

Of course Heisman voting used to be even worse. In 1974 the voting was finished before Anthony Davis destroyed Notre Dame and thus Archie Griffin won.
 

CHERRYMAN

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 3, 2005
12
0
0
VERY GOOD POINT

VERY GOOD POINT

I too believe that the voting should take into account the biggest games.

My point of VY as the best player this year is that he was the specific player who took over the NC game (he could change his initials to MJ) and won it almost single handedly against one of the most prolific teams in NCAA history. His ability did shine all year as fans from the south who watched this phenom knew as far back as middle of last year in his tremendous 400+ yard comeback wins over OKST and finally in the RB last year.

Both of these stars future is bright on the next level. It should be fun to watch in NFL over next 3-7 years.

Hook em Horns
 

RexBudler

Wonder Dog
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2003
14,927
30
0
54
Irvine, California
I know Vince has had good games before and he has been a stud in college. But its sooooooo funny how after this Rose Bowl performance he is now like the greatest college QB prospect in the HISTORY of football :mj07: :mj07: .......By the way some peeps talk he is also gonna be hands down the greatest NFL QB of ALL time.....

Can you say Kordell Stewart :mj07: :mj07: :s4: :s4:
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
There is one problem with voting after bowl games. Lets flip it around. VY during the season had the Heisman locked up. Then he had an off day and Bush closed season strong. = Bush winning it.

Lets say Bush didn't close season strong and was just steady. Young was Young. Young has the Heisman locked up and Bush clear #2. In the NC game Bush dominates and USC wins. Young plays above average but nothing special.

BUSH WILL WIN THE HEISMAN! That is not right and not fair to Young.

Another problem is it most likely will go to the player on the winning team if both contenders are playing against each other.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top