I see a lot of talk about how good the Pats D has been over the last 2 months...But look who they've played...
Jax...hobbled at both RB and QB
Miami, lost.
Jets, rubbish.
TB, terrible offense, esp. on the road.
Buff, rubbish.
@ KC, lost.
NO, rubbish.
Throughout the season they have played 5 teams who av. more than 4.0 yards a carry;
lost @ home to SD 17-41!...gave up 183/40 on the ground.
beat Atl 31-28 BUT...no Vick. (which totally negates their running stats anyway...although they still allowed 116/26)
lost @ Denver 20-28...were 28-6 down at 3/4 time!...allowed 178/34.
won 23-16 @ Miami...77/25...did well....of course they were a 3-6 team at the time!
lost @ KC...16-26....119/31
lost v. Miami...26-28...gave up 148/40.
A QB comparison:
Season:
Plummer...rating 90.2...60.7%...ypa 7.4...INT 7..WINS 13- 3
Brady......rating 92.3...63.0%...ypa 7.8...INT 14..WINS 10-6
SINCE wk.12: (even if we don't count the last 'meaningless' games for both)
Plummer...rating 84...60.3%...ypa 7.9...INT 4....WINS 4-1
Brady......rating 89...66%......ypa 7.3...INT 8....WINS 4-1
DIRECT COMPARISON: (4 games, @ KC, v. Oak, v. SD & @ Mia)
Plummer...rating 69.8...58.9%...ypa 7.6...INT 6....WINS 2-2
Brady......rating 76.0...58.9%...ypa 7.2...INT 7....WINS 2-2
So...we can clearly see that there just isn't anything at all between the two QB's!...but...
We've got a 13-3 team v. a 10-6 team, off a BYE, with the best legit rushing offense, the second best rushing D, a QB who throws less INTs, a defense that gets more INTs, a much better pass D (inc. more sacks), they've already beaten their opposition, have arguably the biggest home field advantage...allowing just 12.5 ppg at home!...and only laying a FG??!!
Too many people living off the memories in this one...Denver -3 thanks very much. :clap:
Jax...hobbled at both RB and QB
Miami, lost.
Jets, rubbish.
TB, terrible offense, esp. on the road.
Buff, rubbish.
@ KC, lost.
NO, rubbish.
Throughout the season they have played 5 teams who av. more than 4.0 yards a carry;
lost @ home to SD 17-41!...gave up 183/40 on the ground.
beat Atl 31-28 BUT...no Vick. (which totally negates their running stats anyway...although they still allowed 116/26)
lost @ Denver 20-28...were 28-6 down at 3/4 time!...allowed 178/34.
won 23-16 @ Miami...77/25...did well....of course they were a 3-6 team at the time!
lost @ KC...16-26....119/31
lost v. Miami...26-28...gave up 148/40.
A QB comparison:
Season:
Plummer...rating 90.2...60.7%...ypa 7.4...INT 7..WINS 13- 3
Brady......rating 92.3...63.0%...ypa 7.8...INT 14..WINS 10-6
SINCE wk.12: (even if we don't count the last 'meaningless' games for both)
Plummer...rating 84...60.3%...ypa 7.9...INT 4....WINS 4-1
Brady......rating 89...66%......ypa 7.3...INT 8....WINS 4-1
DIRECT COMPARISON: (4 games, @ KC, v. Oak, v. SD & @ Mia)
Plummer...rating 69.8...58.9%...ypa 7.6...INT 6....WINS 2-2
Brady......rating 76.0...58.9%...ypa 7.2...INT 7....WINS 2-2
So...we can clearly see that there just isn't anything at all between the two QB's!...but...
We've got a 13-3 team v. a 10-6 team, off a BYE, with the best legit rushing offense, the second best rushing D, a QB who throws less INTs, a defense that gets more INTs, a much better pass D (inc. more sacks), they've already beaten their opposition, have arguably the biggest home field advantage...allowing just 12.5 ppg at home!...and only laying a FG??!!
Too many people living off the memories in this one...Denver -3 thanks very much. :clap: