NFC Championship pick...

Glenn Quagmire

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2005
7,067
0
0
NFL YTD (25-18-1)

Ever since starting out well I've been mired in mediocrity. I was thinking about betting on the Broncos game because I like them a lot this weekend, but I figured why not stick with the team I know better than any other? Having said that, I probably won't be able to watch the game based on this pick...

Carolina (+4.5 and ML) Bear with me fellas, this may be long. Anyway, I really like Carolina to win this game by about 7 points. I'll try to isolate my thoughts as best I can. So here we go...

A couple of random thoughts... why were they making such a big deal out of whether or not Locklear would start/play? Womack was the starting RT coming out of training camp. He is every bit as good as Locklear and only lost the job due to injury.

And why is the Foster injury supposed to be so crushing? Granted, he is a better back than Goings. But exactly HOW much better? Goings had 5 100 yards game in the 7 that he started last year. He is more than capable of producing. And the bottom line is this... neither one of those guys was/is going to run on Seattle this weekend. It's not well known, but Seattle has the #5 run D in the NFL. If they can stop Portis, they would have stopped Foster.

Seattle on O - Seattle will spread the field with 3 and 4 WR sets like they always do. These are their most effective formations. It gives Alexander lanes to run in and it gives Hass extra options. I know I'm disagreeing with a lot of people when I say this, but I just don't see Alexander doing much on Sunday. The Panthers have a great run D and he will be keyed on all game long. They can stack the box and take away the run because they have a good secondary. Seattle has no speed burner WRs so Carolina can afford to be aggressive upfront and play 1-on-1 with their very good corners. Like I said before, if Seattle is going to win this game it will be on the shoulders of ol' Matty Hass. And yes, I know Seattle has a great left side of the line and a stud FB blocking for Smiley, I just don't think it will matter. The Panthers have an amazing front 7 and I see them stopping the run all day. Seattle has had a problem with big, physical defenses all season long. Although he didn't play much against Washington Shaun had 6 carries for 9 yards. I don't think he would have magically pulled it together even if he had played the whole game. I don't think Sunday will be any different.

Seattle on D - I expect Seattle to be aggressive. They will do everything they can to slow down Smith, and they have the luxury of knowing the other team's RB probably won't have a big game. I expect them to try to get a lot of pressure on Delhomme and confuse him with multiple blitz packages. This would be uncharacteristic, because Rhodes hates blitzing. He likes to bring pressure with just the front four. Still, I think they will do whatever they can to rattle Jake. Smith will be double and maybe even triple-covered in this game. Seattle knows if they can stop him they have a great chance of winning. The funny thing is, I don't think they can. If the Bears D can't, why should I believe Seattle's can? Their pass D is VERY poor, so I think they are in for a long day. And I may be crazy for saying this, but I wouldn't be surprised to see an unsung hero step up in this game for Carolina since Smith will garner so much attention. Mangum? Hoover? Goings? Someone else is going to get catches. But who?

Carolina on O - I think Goings is going to get bottled up pretty well but I also think Carolina will try to establish him. They know that Seattle will be keying on Smith. I'm sure they want to use the run to loosen things up if they can. If they can establish even a mediocre run game that would set up the play pass. Not saying they will be able to, but I do expect them to try. I also expect them to get the ball to Smith as much as possible. Not just throwing the ball, but end arounds, handoffs, etc. If they don't get him the ball at least 15 times in this game they are making a huge mistake. There's not too much to write about here. I think the whole world knows Carolina will look to get Smith involved. My biggest question is how much time will the line give Jake to throw? That's one of the keys to the game in my opinion. I do think Seattle will get to him, but I also think their aggressiveness could come back to haunt them a few times.

Carolina on D - As I said before, I really think Carolina will sell out against the run in this game. I don't see Alexander gaining more than 70 yards, and I think he would have to have about 25 carries or more to even get that much. Yes Seattle has a potent passing game, but Carolina has a very good secondary. I think they would like to limit Alexander early and force Seattle to throw. And here's the thing... Holmgren has always been a pass first, run second kind of guy. He's done a little better job this year, but mark my words, if the running game sputters this will be a chuckfest for Hass and the Seahawks. I'll say it again, if Seattle wins it will be because of Matt and the receiving corps. For the life of me I just can't see Shaun having a big game. Peppers will definitely play in this game, but how healthy is he? Carolina's front four needs to pressure Hass. He's at his worst when he's being pressured. Anyone remember that whirling dirvish pass last week against Washington when he was backpedaling? If you rattle him he will make some bad decisions. Not a lot of bad decisions, but enough to hurt his team.

I'll take Fox over Holmgren any day and twice on Sunday. Holmgren is a shitty playcaller, pure and simple. He also makes some idiotic decisions, like making Jimmy Williams a punt returner in the first place (never should have happened). And last week, after he muffs a punt, he left him in the rest of the game?! Bobby Engram used to be the punt returner and he did a good job. He's the most sure-handed Seahawk on the team. For some reason Holmgren replaced him. Maybe he didn't want to risk injury? Now he has Warrick returning punts this week. Wow. There's a good idea. Replacing the crappy player with another crappy player who hasn't seen game action in HOW long? Genius.

I'll wrap this up now by saying as great as Seattle's O is, I don't see them scoring too much on Sunday. Washington shut them down pretty well and Carolina's D is even better. As much as I hate to say it, I think Carolina's D will frustrate Alexander and the Seahawks all day long.

Final score -- Carolina 24, Seattle 17

GLTA

P.S. If my crappy sportsbook would ever post the prop for Alexander's total rushing yards I'll probably take whatever the under is. Just a head's up but I'll post that pick too.
 

Glenn Quagmire

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2005
7,067
0
0
Yeah, so I knew I would forget a couple of things. Intangibles...

While injuries for Carolina concern me slightly, the 3rd road game in a row angle doens't really worry me at all. Maybe if this were the regular season it would, but these guys are playing for the friggin' SB. I have to think they will have enough adrenaline running through their veins to play about 8 hours of football, let alone 3.

Experience factor also goes to Carolina. Just a few short years ago they were in the SB. Seattle has never been there. In fact, this is the first Championship game for Seattle since 1984. They finally got over that hump, but can they take it to the next level? I know I already said this a few days ago, but here in Seattle there is a lot of pressure on these guys. These guys can't do an interview on TV or radio without the media bringing up 1984 and/or the fact that the SB is around the corner. They're playing up the whole "Seattle has never had a winner. It's up to you guys." kind of angle. Who knows, maybe that will help. I think it will have the opposite effect. I wouldn't be surprised to see Seattle play tight and make some mistakes on Sunday. The weight of this city is on their shoulders. Historically the Seahawks have folded in the pressure. We'll see how they respond on Sunday...
 

Glenn Quagmire

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2005
7,067
0
0
Thanks Killian. I've been a Hawks fan my whole life so I may not be able to watch this one. It's going to be a bittersweet day for me either way. I either win my bets and my team loses, or I lose my bets and my team wins. I know one thing... if they make the SB I won't be able to bet against them. Besides, I think they would lynch me in Pioneer Square if I did that!

GL to you as well...
 

thom24ad

UDFlyers
Forum Member
Sep 29, 2005
2,124
0
0
46
Columbus, OH
Great write ups Glenn...been busy at work this week...not sure how I am playing this weekend...struggling with Carolina...they seem beat up and Peppers not practicing worries me a little...I should post tonight
 

bike1

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 3, 2001
125
2
18
BOYNTON BEACH, FLA
BEAR'S BALLS??????

BEAR'S BALLS??????

GLENN
" If the Bears D can't, why should I believe Seattle's can?"

THE BEARS HAD THE BALLS AND THE COMPLETE ARROGANCE NOT TO DOUBLE COVER SMITH, THINKING THEIR REGULAR D WOULD SUFFICE. I HEARD FOX STATE IN AN INTERVIEW ON FAN RADIO - NY THAT HE WAS SHOCKED TO SEE THE LACK OF DOUBLE COVERAGE AND EXPLOITED IT, RESULTING IN 2 TDS. I AGREE THAT HAWK'S PASS D IS NOT GREAT BUT IT IS A FAST AND DECENT TEAM DEFENSE. THIS IS A VERY TOUGH PIC. BTW ANY LOCAL WORD ON THE CONDITION OF S. ALEXANDER? HE STATED IN AN INTERVIEW THAT HE WAS OUT FOR 20 MIN -- WHICH IS A MAJOR CONCUSSION.
THANX & GOOD LUCK

BIKE
 

Killian

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 30, 2002
291
0
0
75
Seattle, Wa.
Word here is that Alexander is fine and will play ......Seattle won't have to worry about the run in this game as Goings isn't the type of back that is going to be a game breaker. Longest run from scrimmage in the last two years is 17 yards. With that in mind Seattle won't have to stack the box....their front four will do the job allowing the defense to drop back into coverage and do what they need to do in order to stop the Panther passing attack.
 

Glenn Quagmire

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2005
7,067
0
0
bike1 said:
GLENN
" If the Bears D can't, why should I believe Seattle's can?"

THE BEARS HAD THE BALLS AND THE COMPLETE ARROGANCE NOT TO DOUBLE COVER SMITH, THINKING THEIR REGULAR D WOULD SUFFICE. I HEARD FOX STATE IN AN INTERVIEW ON FAN RADIO - NY THAT HE WAS SHOCKED TO SEE THE LACK OF DOUBLE COVERAGE AND EXPLOITED IT, RESULTING IN 2 TDS. I AGREE THAT HAWK'S PASS D IS NOT GREAT BUT IT IS A FAST AND DECENT TEAM DEFENSE. THIS IS A VERY TOUGH PIC. BTW ANY LOCAL WORD ON THE CONDITION OF S. ALEXANDER? HE STATED IN AN INTERVIEW THAT HE WAS OUT FOR 20 MIN -- WHICH IS A MAJOR CONCUSSION.
THANX & GOOD LUCK

BIKE


Yeah, the Bears really screwed that up big time. Smith is a stud, why wouldn't you double-team him? I agree with you about the Hawks overall defense. I think it's pretty good too and they have some great young players. I just think their pass D is a bit suspect. Which, for Carolina, is a big plus. I think Carolina would be in a lot more trouble if the Hawks had a great pass D and poor run D. Especially with Goings as their back now. As for Alexander, I think he's fine. He should not only play but start on Sunday. Good luck to you as well...
 

Glenn Quagmire

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2005
7,067
0
0
thom24ad said:
Good Luck with your picks Glenn!

Thanks Thom. Good luck to you as well. I think we're on opposite sides of the Hawks game but I like Denver a lot this week too. I've been considering betting it but I was hoping the line would drop with so many people on Pitt. I just think Pitt is a really popular pick this week because of their win over Indy last week. Maybe I'm crazy, but I think Denver is a much tougher matchup for them than Indy was. Anyway, good luck again with your picks...
 

Glenn Quagmire

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2005
7,067
0
0
I still love Denver -3 but can't seem to pull the trigger. I am however adding this one...

Alexander (Under 101.5 rushing yards) - I just don't see Alexander getting 100 yards on that run D. A few things of note... Alexander averaged about 118 rushing yards a game this year. That's against the likes of the Niners, Cardinals, Rams (whom he played 8 games against) and other crappy teams like the Titans. Now I'm supposed to believe he's going to get almost that many yards against the #2 run D in the NFL? Why??? As I said before, I really think the Panthers will gameplan to shut down Alexander. I also know from watching this guy every week that he does not do well against big, physical defenses. He may be a big back, but he runs like a finesse runner. He doesn't hit the whole hard and he shies away from contact. He was getting shut down last weekend against Washington before he got injured. Another thing is that Holmgren has always been a pass first guy. He's a former QB for Chrissakes. He will VERY quickly abandon the run if it's getting shut down. That's pretty much been his M.O. his entire tenure here in Seattle.

GLTA...
 

longshot

Herbalizer
Forum Member
Dec 12, 2005
139
2
18
alexander

alexander

His playoff avg. is like 2.2 yards/gm. He's one good shot away from being done for the day.
wash. D was kicking the sh!t out of him, I'm afraid to see what Car. does to him. Really liked Car. to win the NFC all playoffs but may have to stay away because I'm going to the game and would like to cheer for the home team.
alexander under 101.5 (-145) odds are killing me but I also really like his under.
 

longshot

Herbalizer
Forum Member
Dec 12, 2005
139
2
18
2.2 yrds/carry

2.2 yrds/carry

will this guy ever step it up in a game that counts?
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top