Is Al-Jazeera reporting news or promoting terror?

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
good article....

January 21, 2006


Al-Qaida's network of choice says it is unfairly criticized by U.S. and others for doing its

By Jim Krane
Associated Press

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates -- When bad news from the Middle East comes to America, one station seems to bring it most often: Al-Jazeera. This week, the satellite network got two exclusives from militants: a video of a kidnapped American and an audiotape from Osama bin Laden.

Does that make Al-Jazeera a mouthpiece for terrorists?
"This is news," says editor-in-chief Ahmed al-Sheikh. "Any other station would jump at this. Why label us?"
Two weeks ago, the Arab network carried another goading address from bin Laden's top deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, who said a limited U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq represented "the victory of Islam."
Analysts say Al-Jazeera, which is based in and bankrolled by Qatar and has not turned a profit in its 10 years on the air, has carved out a niche for itself by channeling al-Qaida's statements to the world.
That makes the network controversial. The statements become huge news events, getting picked up by every major news agency and being vetted for authenticity by the CIA.
"They're just like any other news organization. Based on their viewership, they make news choices," said Ben Venzke, a Washington-based U.S. government contractor who analyzes al-Qaida tapes. "The thing that makes them stand apart is that they're the first recipient of the overwhelming majority of releases from bin Laden and al-Zawahri."
That fact hasn't escaped notice in Washington, where President Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld criticized the station, accusing it of fueling anti-American sentiment and giving terrorists a podium.
Al-Jazeera says it deals with tapes on the basis of news value.
When tapes come in -- the network rarely says how it gets them -- Al-Jazeera's editors wrangle over what portions, if any, they can air, al-Sheikh said.
In the case of the bin Laden message broadcast Thursday, the station played only a few minutes of the 10-minute tape, based on what it considered important, he said. The entire tape was transcribed and posted on Al-Jazeera's Web site.
Tapes of kidnap victims are the most problematic. When they arrive, the station gets in touch with the hostage's embassy and asks a representative to view the tape and contact the family. Only when the family is notified does Al-Jazeera air any footage, al-Sheikh said.
Even then, it airs only parts that show the victim in "the most humane light possible," he said. Al-Jazeera's editorial policies now prohibit it from carrying the voices of kidnappers or their victims.
Rumsfeld and other U.S. officials have accused Al-Jazeera of airing videos of hostages being beheaded. But in fact the station has never done so. The gory videos have appeared on Web forums used by Islamic militants.
Militant groups choose to send messages to Al-Jazeera for a variety of reasons, analysts say.
First, bin Laden and al-Zawahri are thought to be most interested in influencing Arab public opinion, and Al-Jazeera may be the best way to reach that audience.
"Al-Qaida's real target isn't the United States or the West, it's Arab public opinion," said Jon Alterman, who heads the Middle East program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
they`re starting "al jazeera international" news network.........i`ve seen dave marash,old abc reporter,i believe,huckstering the new network....

claiming that it will be very fair....i have my doubts...we`ll see...

they really are trying very hard to indoctrinate the west with their message....

our own media bitching about us "planting" news stories in the middle eastern media?....that`s silly...

shouldn`t we reciprocate?...

isn`t propaganda a useful tool in times of war?...

they think so...i think so ,too...
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,486
165
63
Bowling Green Ky
No doubt love affair between NYT/Algazeera but NOW we have one going between UBL and liberals--
as reported on Algazeera--

Bin Laden boosts anti-Bush book


Sunday 22 January 2006, 2:25 Makka Time, 23:25 GMT


Bin Laden says it will be useful to read Rogue State

Osama bin Laden has unwittingly shot an obscure book by a Washington historian into one of the nation's bestseller lists by recommending it in his latest verbal attack on the United States.

Since the al-Qaida leader mentioned Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower in his tape on Thursday, William Blum's book has gone from 205,763 on the Amazon.com list of bestsellers to number 27 on Saturday.

As he fought off media attention, Blum, 72, who lives in a one-room apartment in the US capital, told US media he had no regrets about the boost from bin Laden and had not received any threats.

"This is almost as good as being an Oprah book," he told The Washington Post, referring to the successful book club run by American television media celebrity Oprah Winfrey.

"I was not turned off by the endorsement," he told a New York radio station. "I am not repulsed and I am not going to pretend I am."

Reading list

Terrorism and political experts started scrambling for reference books after bin Laden said in his message: "If Bush carries on with his lies and oppression, it would be useful for you to read Rogue State."

Bin Laden then went on to quote from Blum's book which says that if the writer were the US president, he would "give an apology to all the widows and orphans and all those who were tortured. Then I would announce that American interference in the nations of the world has ended once and for all."

"I am not repulsed and I am not going to pretend I am"

William Blum,
author

Blum said that up to Thursday Rogue State and his other book Killing Hope had sold about 150,000 copies in English and other languages.

His publisher, Common Courage Press, could not give an estimate of the boost given by bin Laden's reference.

Foreign policy problems

Blum has made it clear that there was no justification for the 11 September attacks on New York and Washington, but that they were "an understandable retaliation against US foreign policy".

The son of Polish immigrants, Blum worked at the State Department in the 1960s, but the Vietnam war turned him against US foreign policy, and he quit to help found an underground newspaper, the Washington Free Press.

Though Rogue State may not be to the taste of President George Bush's administration, it has many fans in academia.

Peter Dale Scott, an author and former professor at the University of California at Berkeley, said: "Critics will call this a one-sided book. But it is an invaluable corrective to the establishment portrait of America as the world's greatest force for peace."
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top