Morris said:Thought sure Seattle would open up about a 4 1/2 pt. favorite. Time to rethink.
Don't know about other Offshores, but one of mine (Millenium) had a line out over the bowl games of NFC +10'
Morris said:Thought sure Seattle would open up about a 4 1/2 pt. favorite. Time to rethink.
:cursin: I saw the same line...I should have played it just for the hell of ittrolln4walii said:Don't know about other Offshores, but one of mine (Millenium) had a line out over the bowl games of NFC +10
thom24ad said:-Bettis playing in Detroit makes absolutely no difference in Pitt's ability to run the ball and/or Seattle's ability to stop the run...the Seahawks run D is very solid
-that wasn't the case last season...I believe NE didn't cover the points...but I think your right about favorites usually win but do they cover? Does anyone have a stat for that?
-Its not like Seattle is flying in the night before the game. They will have plenty of time to get used to the time zone. And what evidence do you have that Seattle plays bad against East coast teams they went 6-2 against East Coast teams this season. Excluding the last three games because they had home field wrapped up. One of the East Coast losses were Wash and well they beat Wash when it mattered the most. And to get to the SB they had to beat two east coast teams.
-then why even play the game let's just give Pitt the SB trophy and be done with it
I'm not going to argue the fact that Pitt will have more fans then Seattle but that aspect of the game is more then obvious. And I still haven't made up my mind on my play just yet so I am backing neither team, but most of your logic of why Pitt wins is somewhat questionable
socrstud said:Totally agree....Pitt -7 easy....Pitt's D will get to Hassel back and Polamalu will keep the recievers honest.
Note: For the comment about home field adv:
Detroit is a 4 hour drive and Mich is same time zone (Eastern) Distance for fans for Pitt, and Distance for Seattle fans....No comparison, unless everyone from Seattle is planning on flying and paying 300 for airfare + thier 500-800 dollar superbowl ticket...
Also lets not forget about what Pitt did against Detroit in the dome....And to Indy in the Dome, and to Minnesota....I think they played Minn at Minn but could be wrong
Fans are going to be 4-1 meaning 4X as many Pitt fans....
----------
Also for the comment about Time zone and managing a team....
Obviously that comment is wrong and they have never played on a collegiate traveling team or professional traveling team....
Seattle is not going to take a field trip to Detroit for a week and let their players get soft. Are they going to do laps around the hotel parking lot? And if you do think they will, where are they going to train, are they going to compete for field time with Pittsburgh getting their a week early....DON"T THINK SO....
Seattle will train all week, and get there 2 at the most 3 days before the superbowl....Prolly 2 days to rest, review film, and have meetings 3 times a day, and yes prolly stretch and lightly condition somewhere....
And as the saying goes....for every hour you lose or gain through the air takes a day to get use to. I would be surprised if they get thier 4 days in advance. Either way these football players biological clock is all screwed up....
Pittsburgh will drive in thier bus, or either fly a couple days in advance and make sure they are ready..... And again
NFC stands for No Freaking Chance....This line will move about 1.5 to 2 points in favor of Pitt unless something gets leaked out that a player is hurt or something....(just a prediction)
GL with everyones plays
:mj07: :142smilie :142smilieSun Tzu said:gjn agreeing with me twice in a week....if Scott admits Texas was better and Carroll isnt perfect the apocalypse could be near
No...actually played Philly...but seriously thinking Pitt is just going to be able to run the ball just because Bettis is from Detroit is retarded along with Seattle doesn't play good against East Coast teams...Hey, I just questioned your logic with some of your top five reasons or whatever that wassocrstud said:Is that what you said last year when New-England was the favorite???? I hope not
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.