Fresh Pickings from the Wire

Master Capper

Emperior
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2002
9,104
11
0
Dunedin, Florida
Allen on Warner
NH Insider runs an interesting interview with Sen. George Allen (R-VA) that hints at the positions he may take in a presidential campaign. Of particular interest are his comments on former Virginia Gov. Mark Warner (D), who could face him in the 2008 presidential election.
"On issues that Governor Warner and I found common ground ? such as education ? we have worked well together. One of the most important things that Governor Warner did was to resist calls for watering down Virginia?s Standards of Learning and wholeheartedly support the education reforms that were begun when I was Governor. As a result, Virginia?s students have continued to make significant progress in learning and are receiving the best education in the nation.

"We also disagreed on issues. Governor Warner?s tax increase was the largest in Virginia?s long history. Some will applaud it, others will criticize. I think everyone knows where I stood on it. I did not believe that it was necessary and I think that our recent surpluses since have tended to support my view that a tax increase was undesirable. I felt it was wrong to raise the taxes without letting the people vote on it. Governor Warner won office by promising he would not raise taxes. I did not support his tax increase and I was joined by Governor Wilder and others on both sides of the aisle."


Casey Maintains Solid Lead Over Santorum
In the Pennsylvania U.S. Senate race, Bob Casey (D) continues to lead Sen. RIck Santorum, 50% to 40%, according to a new Strategic Vision (R) poll.


The Death of a Presidency
There are some good pieces in the new issue of The Forum, including an essay by John K. White on how presidents battle back from periods of unpopularity.
"Successful presidents have been able to reverse their low standing when they can change the subject. Such was the case for Harry Truman in 1948, Ronald Reagan in 1987, and Bill Clinton in 1995. Truman got back to the New Deal/Fair Deal agenda, Reagan acknowledged mistakes in the Iran-Contra scandal, and Clinton decided to get back to his middle class agenda. Unsuccessful presidents are those who found themselves in political trouble and could not change the subject. These include Truman in 1952 (Korea), Richard Nixon in 1974 (Watergate), Jimmy Carter in 1980 (Iranian hostages and the economy), and George H. W. Bush in 1992 (the economy). George W. Bush is likely to be one of the unsuccessful presidents. Iraq has brought this presidency to new lows in public approval, and it is unlikely that Bush will be able to shift the public focus away from Iraq."


Bush Gets Little Credit for Economy
"White House officials have been frustrated for months that President Bush gets so little credit from the public for an economy that's moving along reasonably well," the Wall Street Journal's Washington Wire observes. "They will have to continue to be frustrated, it appears."

A new Pew Research Center poll "shows that only about a third of Americans (34%) rate economic conditions as excellent or good. Almost twice as many -- 64% -- call conditions only fair or poor. Overall, attitudes are darker than they were a year ago."

Key takeaway: "Public views of the economy are deeply split along political lines. Republicans generally see an economy that is thriving; 56% judge it as excellent or good. Democrats and independents see it much more negatively; just 28% of independents and 23% of Democrats say the economy is doing well. Public perceptions of the economy were far less polarized during the Clinton administration

Prepping for Possible Impeachment
"The Bush administration is bracing for impeachment hearings in Congress," Insight magazine reports.

"Sources said a prelude to the impeachment process could begin with hearings by the Senate Judiciary Committee in February. They said the hearings would focus on the secret electronic surveillance program and whether Mr. Bush violated the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act."

Said the source: "Our arithmetic shows that a majority of the committee could vote against the president. If we work hard, there could be a tie."

Meanwhile, a new USA Today/CNN/Gallup Poll "shows public sentiment is against the program. Fifty-one percent of Americans said the administration was wrong to intercept conversations involving a party inside the USA without a warrant. In response to another question, 58% of Americans said they support the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate the program

Schwarzenegger Deadlocked with Challengers
California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) "is neck and neck with either of two potential Democratic challengers," according to a new Rasmussen Reports poll.

In a match-up with State Treasurer Phil Angelides (D), Schwarzenegger leads 41% to 39%. Against State Comptroller Steve Westly (D), Schwarzenegger trails 39% to 40%.


Conservatives Win in Canada
"Stephen Harper and his Conservative Party defeated the long entrenched Liberal Party in Canadian elections on Monday," the New York Times reports. "A Conservative victory is a striking turn in the country's politics and is likely to improve Canada's strained relations with the Bush administration."

The Washington Post notes Harper "fell short of winning a clear majority in the 308-seat House of Commons. He will need to compromise with opponents to form a government and further his agenda of scaling back social programs, cutting taxes and winnowing the power of the federal government."


Democrats Make Inroads
An analysis of Gallup Poll data from last year "shows that the Democratic Party made gains in party identification among the American public. The year marked new lows in President George W. Bush's job approval ratings amid difficulties in Iraq, high gas prices, and criticisms of the government response to the Hurricane Katrina disaster. Democrats made gains in party identification on the national level and more U.S. states had Democratic leanings in 2005 than any time in the last four years."

"Overall, in 2005, basic party identification was even -- 33% of Americans each identified as Republicans, independents, and Democrats. When independents' leanings are taken into account, the Democrats gain an advantage -- 48% of Americans either identified as Democrats or leaned to the Democratic Party, while 43% identified as Republicans or leaned to the Republican Party. That represents the largest Democratic advantage since 2000."
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
167
63
Bowling Green Ky
"Republicans generally see an economy that is thriving; 56% judge it as excellent or good. Democrats and independents see it much more negatively; just 28% of independents and 23% of Democrats say the economy is doing well."

Thats understandible the market and employment has been at highs--welfare and entitlement benefits were recently cut.

"Iraq has brought this presidency to new lows in public approval, and it is unlikely that Bush will be able to shift the public focus away from Iraq."

New lows--has there ever been any lower ratings than Clintons after cigar stuffing/perjury episode????

"Meanwhile, a new USA Today/CNN/Gallup Poll "shows public sentiment is against the program. Fifty-one percent of Americans said the administration was wrong to intercept conversations involving a party inside the USA without a warrant. In response to another question, 58% of Americans said they support the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate the program"

51 % is public sentiment is against--what a whopping majority--lets see what "portion" of survey results they opted to report and which portion they chopped ;) -hmm seems they didn't want you know a only 500 people were in survey ;) Wish someone could find us a liberal site that wouldn't chop and cut what parts of reports they want you to see and which they don't--

Here is ENTIRE report in context--

The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to take up the issue in public hearings beginning Feb. 6. A new USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll shows public sentiment is against the program. Fifty-one percent of Americans said the administration was wrong to intercept conversations involving a party inside the USA without a warrant. In response to another question, 58% of Americans said they support the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate the program. Both questions were asked of about 500 adults Friday through Sunday and have a margin of error of +/-5 percentage points.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Sounds like they screwed up again. There is many signs this Pres or maybe it's the VP want lots more power. I hope Evey American fights that idea. We don't need to change our government. Just because this bunch seems to see's a enemy behind every tree.
 

Master Capper

Emperior
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2002
9,104
11
0
Dunedin, Florida
By ROBERT BURNS, AP Military Writer
Tue Jan 24, 6:43 PM ET



WASHINGTON - Stretched by frequent troop rotations to Iraq and Afghanistan, the Army has become a "thin green line" that could snap unless relief comes soon, according to a study for the Pentagon.


Andrew Krepinevich, a retired Army officer who wrote the report under a Pentagon contract, concluded that the Army cannot sustain the pace of troop deployments to Iraq long enough to break the back of the insurgency. He also suggested that the Pentagon's decision, announced in December, to begin reducing the force in Iraq this year was driven in part by a realization that the Army was overextended.

As evidence, Krepinevich points to the Army's 2005 recruiting slump ? missing its recruiting goal for the first time since 1999 ? and its decision to offer much bigger enlistment bonuses and other incentives.

"You really begin to wonder just how much stress and strain there is on the Army, how much longer it can continue," he said in an interview. He added that the Army is still a highly effective fighting force and is implementing a plan that will expand the number of combat brigades available for rotations to Iraq and Afghanistan.

The 136-page report represents a more sobering picture of the Army's condition than military officials offer in public. While not released publicly, a copy of the report was provided in response to an Associated Press inquiry.

Illustrating his level of concern about strain on the Army, Krepinevich titled one of his report's chapters, "The Thin Green Line."

He wrote that the Army is "in a race against time" to adjust to the demands of war "or risk `breaking' the force in the form of a catastrophic decline" in recruitment and re-enlistment.

Col. Lewis Boone, spokesman for Army Forces Command, which is responsible for providing troops to war commanders, said it would be "a very extreme characterization" to call the Army broken. He said his organization has been able to fulfill every request for troops that it has received from field commanders.

The Krepinevich assessment is the latest in the debate over whether the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have worn out the Army, how the strains can be eased and whether the U.S. military is too burdened to defeat other threats.

Rep. John Murtha (news, bio, voting record), the Pennsylvania Democrat and Vietnam veteran, created a political storm last fall when he called for an early exit from Iraq, arguing that the Army was "broken, worn out" and fueling the insurgency by its mere presence. Administration officials have hotly contested that view.

George Joulwan, a retired four-star Army general and former NATO commander, agrees the Army is stretched thin.

"Whether they're broken or not, I think I would say if we don't change the way we're doing business, they're in danger of being fractured and broken, and I would agree with that," Joulwan told CNN last month.

Krepinevich did not conclude that U.S. forces should quit Iraq now, but said it may be possible to reduce troop levels below 100,000 by the end of the year. There now are about 136,000, Pentagon officials said Tuesday.

For an Army of about 500,000 soldiers ? not counting the thousands of National Guard and Reserve soldiers now on active duty ? the commitment of 100,000 or so to Iraq might not seem an excessive burden. But because the war has lasted longer than expected, the Army has had to regularly rotate fresh units in while maintaining its normal training efforts and reorganizing the force from top to bottom.

Krepinevich's analysis, while consistent with the conclusions of some outside the Bush administration, is in stark contrast with the public statements of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and senior Army officials.

Army Secretary Francis Harvey, for example, opened a Pentagon news conference last week by denying the Army was in trouble. "Today's Army is the most capable, best-trained, best-equipped and most experienced force our nation has fielded in well over a decade," he said, adding that recruiting has picked up.

Rumsfeld has argued that the experience of fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan has made the Army stronger, not weaker.

"The Army is probably as strong and capable as it ever has been in the history of this country," he said in an appearance at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies in Washington on Dec. 5. "They are more experienced, more capable, better equipped than ever before."

Krepinevich said in the interview that he understands why Pentagon officials do not state publicly that they are being forced to reduce troop levels in Iraq because of stress on the Army. "That gives too much encouragement to the enemy," he said, even if a number of signs, such as a recruiting slump, point in that direction.

Krepinevich is executive director of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, a nonprofit policy research institute.

He said he concluded that even Army leaders are not sure how much longer they can keep up the unusually high pace of combat tours in Iraq before they trigger an institutional crisis. Some major Army divisions are serving their second yearlong tours in Iraq, and some smaller units have served three times.

Michael O'Hanlon, a military expert at the private Brookings Institution, said in a recent interview that "it's a judgment call" whether the risk of breaking the Army is great enough to warrant expanding its size.

"I say yes. But it's a judgment call, because so far the Army isn't broken," O'Hanlon said
 

bjfinste

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
5,462
18
0
AZ
DOGS THAT BARK said:
"Iraq has brought this presidency to new lows in public approval, and it is unlikely that Bush will be able to shift the public focus away from Iraq."

New lows--has there ever been any lower ratings than Clintons after cigar stuffing/perjury episode????

Didn't Clinton's approval ratings not only stay high, but rise following the impeachment stuff? I don't know that for sure, but from what I can recall that was the case.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
i really don`t know why anyone.....would put so much stock into polls....

i see the news citing poll after poll...i see both sides do it time and again....

i`m not talking about exit polling...or polling in regards to making a choice at election time....black and white issues...

i`m talking about the shading of polling questions to lead the respondent in a certain direction...

polls are worded to elicit a certain response...i wish i still had the article that showed how different poll results can be by basically rewording the same question....

pollsters are no different....no different...than politicos,guys on forums or media members....

they aren`t made up from some magical bi-partisan dna strain....

they ALL have a point of view....and in today`s society,ideology is even more biased than at any time i can remember...


and it`s been shown time and again that what people say in public ....and what they do.... are sometimes not the same...


from both ends...

this polling stuff is laughable 80 % of the time,imo...


unless it`s a straightforward black and white issue..."who you gonna vote for?"....."do you own a cat or a dog?".....yada yada...
 
Last edited:

Master Capper

Emperior
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2002
9,104
11
0
Dunedin, Florida
DTB,

I know you hate Clinton and would like to blame him for everything that this administration gets wrong, but at least give accurate numbers when you are bashing the guy...geesshhh your starting to twist facts like Fox News. The fact of the matter is that on the day when impeachment articles were issued Clinton had an approval rating of 73% of the American people. Also, at the same stages of their second term, Clinton had an approval rating of 59% whereas W had an approval rating of 41%!



In the wake of the House of Representatives' approval of two articles of impeachment, Bill Clinton's approval rating has jumped 10 points to 73 percent, the latest CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll shows.

That's not only an all-time high for Clinton, it also beats the highest approval rating President Ronald Reagan ever had.

At the same time, the number of Americans with an unfavorable view of the Republican Party has jumped 10 points; less than a third of the country now has a favorable view of the GOP.

Despite concerns that public calls for Clinton's resignation would rise after his impeachment, the number of Americans who want Clinton to resign has remained statistically unchanged. Only 30 percent want Clinton to resign; only 29 percent want the Senate to convict Clinton and remove him from office.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
167
63
Bowling Green Ky
Clintons low point was 43% on June 1993--when he left office it was high @ 65% I believe.

Yep GW polls are munipulated by both sides mostly on how the question is asked. Example you might find 50% rating on war but if asked how many would prefer Hilliary or anyone else you get some real low ball #'s and in the case of Kerry we found the "real" #'s during election.
--also I'd like to know which areas they poll--which they never tell--also important is what time they call--if its during the day the only ones home are the Opra watching /non working class.

Per your stats MC one must assume the general public likes a 2 time felon as pres--and lying and cigar escapeds are of no concern--in fact if after leaving office --pardoning 7th most wanted on FBI list for cash to him -hilliary and her brother is also no cerncern.
I really doubt values of ave citizen has dropped that low--but maybe your right--i'd say this forum is about 50/50 on issue.

and it wasn't administration I hated MC--it was Clinton character or lack there of.
 

bjfinste

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
5,462
18
0
AZ
DOGS THAT BARK said:
-also important is what time they call--if its during the day the only ones home are the Opra watching /non working class.

That also elmiinates a large chunk of the mid-to-late 20's population that only use cell phones and don't have house numbers to call. For example, I work an unorthodox work schedule... different hours on different days. Today I was off at 10:30 a.m. and am home the rest of the day, but I won't get polled because I only have a cell, and even if I did, it's a Texas number from my former residence. That would be another interesting factor if they polled cells, at least among college graduates, because I have several friends in random parts of the country that still have their cell numbers from the 608 area code and never changed their college cell numbers.
 

Master Capper

Emperior
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2002
9,104
11
0
Dunedin, Florida
Per your stats MC one must assume the general public likes a 2 time felon as pres--and lying and cigar escapeds are of no concern--in fact if after leaving office --pardoning 7th most wanted on FBI list for cash to him -hilliary and her brother is also no cerncern.
I really doubt values of ave citizen has dropped that low--but maybe your right--i'd say this forum is about 50/50 on issue.

and it wasn't administration I hated MC--it was Clinton character or lack there of.


But you accept a administration that is headed by a past cocaine abuser whom also hid his arrest record about a DUI charge instead of coming clean when running in 2000. So what your basically saying that you will accept someone whom obviously has issues as long as they are Reupublican? My numbers come from the AP news story with the same date as the articles of impeachment, thus I cannot validate them but if my memory serves me right then I believe they are correct.
 

Master Capper

Emperior
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2002
9,104
11
0
Dunedin, Florida
Hamas Declares Victory in Palestinian Elections
"In a stunning development ahead of official election results, Prime Minister Ahmed Qorei said he and others in the Palestinian Authority government will resign in the wake of Hamas' apparent parliamentary victory," CNN reports.

"The announcement followed estimates from Wednesday's election that said Hamas had won a majority of seats in the 132-seat Palestinian Legislative Council, supplanting the ruling Fatah party."

In an interview yesterday with the Wall Street Journal, President Bush said that despite the "trend toward democracy that produced Palestinian elections," Hamas "isn't a suitable partner for diplomacy until it renounces its position calling for the destruction of Israel."


GOP Suspends K Street Jobs List
Republican lawmakers "ended their long practice of routinely summoning lobbyists to the Capitol to try to persuade them to hire their aides and colleagues, in the wake of the Jack Abramoff political corruption scandal," Jeffrey Birnbaum reports.

The program "is a remnant of the K Street Project once championed by Rep. Tom DeLay (R-TX) as a way to coerce trade associations and companies to hire Republicans as their top lobbyists and to warn firms that hired Democrats that they would not be welcome."

"The change removes the formal involvement of lawmakers from the process and any implied encouragement by them to transform K Street into a Republican bastion."


Pat?s payoff. Under President Bush, right-wing fundamentalist Pat Robertson?s international ?charity? Operation Blessing has increased its annual revenue from government grants from $108,000 to $14.4 million


52% Percentage of Americans who think Congress should consider impeaching Bush if he wiretapped U.S. citizens without court approval, according to a new Zogby poll
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top