Scott4USC

thom24ad

UDFlyers
Forum Member
Sep 29, 2005
2,124
0
0
46
Columbus, OH
what was the wager you had?...USC will land three top 10 RBs in this year's recruiting class...I think you guys said you would go off of Scout.com.. this is just an update with only 5 days to go....looks like SC needs to get some work done if their going to land those three top ten

http://scout.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=9&c=4&yr=2006&pid=11

-looks like Moody is no longer considered a top-10 RB
 

Sun Tzu

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 10, 2003
6,197
9
0
Houston, Texas
In the end Moody may not be a Top 50 back. He has serious issues. And while USC didnt get Goodson they should be glad....and with what has happened with him lately Carroll should be ashamed for even trying to recruit him.

I will also say that I think Rivals rankings are generally much more solid generally than Scout.
 

Sun Tzu

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 10, 2003
6,197
9
0
Houston, Texas
It has been kept a little quiet though rumors floating around. He was possibly going to recommit to Okie State about two weeks ago. On his visit he apparently was quite vocal and demonstrative in trying to seduce his female recruiting escort - one rumor is he flashed what he has, another rumor is it was physical, but stronger rumors are just verbal. Anyway, Gundy calls him in and and tells him it is inappropriate conduct, Goodson cusses him out, and Goodson gets sent home immediately with offer revoked.

Of course stuff like this never impedes Texas AM. Goodson called Texas and Mack told him "not interested." When was all said and done only two scholls - AM and USC - continued recruiting the guy.
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
JUDGE

There is a problem with our hat bet. I just noticed from the link scout took GABLE off their RB list. (that is BULL$HIT) Gable committed to USC last week and SCOUT had him the #6 rated RB when we made our wager. After he publicly commits (i knew he was a silent) scout took him off the RB list and made him a safety. That is not right. You can move him down the list like they did Moody but not take him OFF the list. When we made the bet, I even mentioned GABLE at RB.

I also unfortunately just noticed Moody dropped from #10 to #12. That is valid and went in your favor. Sucks for me but those are the breaks we agreed too. Otherwise my bet be a lock which I originally thought. :mj07:

You have a decision to make. Moody dropping to #12 is valid because we agreed to go by scouts final top 10 not current top 10. But I am not going to allow scout to take away Gable being the #6 rated RB completely off their RB list.

Let me know if you want to keep the wager ON but Gable MUST be considered a top 10 RB between you and me.

JUST AN FYI, USC can still land 3 of the top 10 RB's without MOODY being ranked in the top 10. :(

USC is after Johnson (who is silent verbal) and SPILLER. Daily News said Spiller was a commit but that might be BOGUS. Moody being currently ranked #12 disqualifies him unless he gets back in the top 10 which is still possible.

Do you accept these changes to our wager or do you want to completely cancel the bet? I'll let you decide either way and I will honor either request. I need you to publicly make a statement.

All in all, USC prob. will get 5 of the nations top 20 RB's!

:scared :scared :scared
 
Last edited:

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
Distance kept Goodson from coming to USC. But he appears to be a headcase.
 

3 Seconds

Fcuk Frist
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2004
6,706
16
0
Marlton, NJ
Scott4USC said:
JUDGE

There is a problem with our hat bet. I just noticed from the link scout took GABLE off their RB list. (that is BULL$HIT) Gable committed to USC last week and SCOUT had him the #6 rated RB when we made our wager. After he publicly commits (i knew he was a silent) scout took him off the RB list and made him a safety. That is not right. You can move him down the list like they did Moody but not take him OFF the list. When we made the bet, I even mentioned GABLE at RB.

I also unfortunately just noticed Moody dropped from #10 to #12. That is valid and went in your favor. Sucks for me but those are the breaks we agreed too. Otherwise my bet be a lock which I originally thought. :mj07:

You have a decision to make. Moody dropping to #12 is valid because we agreed to go by scouts final top 10 not current top 10. But I am not going to allow scout to take away Gable being the #6 rated RB completely off their RB list.

Let me know if you want to keep the wager ON but Gable MUST be considered a top 10 RB between you and me.

JUST AN FYI, USC can still land 3 of the top 10 RB's without MOODY being ranked in the top 10. :(

USC is after Johnson (who is silent verbal) and SPILLER. Daily News said Spiller was a commit. Moody being currently ranked #12 disqualifies him unless he gets back in the top 10.

Do you accept these changes to our wager or do you want to completely cancel the bet? I'll let you decide either way and I will honor either request. I need you to publicly make a statement.

All in all, USC prob. will get 5 of the nations top 20 RB's!

:scared :scared :scared

BS Spin now for your own wager. You cant change rules in the middle of bet. If you didnt think of this possibilty that's not Judge's fault.

I cant call up a book after a game starts & say oh wait they said Vince Young was going to play & now he isnt, so I am not going to allow you to keep the original wager. Here are my terms. You give me 17 additional pts or cancel the bet your choice. :mj07:

I think your line:

"But I am not going to allow scout to take away Gable being the #6 rated RB completely off their RB list."

Best sums you up. You wont allow Scout.
com :mj07: What an egocentric jack ass.

Now what if this happened in reverse & a S all of sudden became an RB. You wouldnt want to exclude him if he was a USC guy.

You are soon to become the WORM44 part II.

I can see a welching coming from a mile away.

You are going to lose, just like USC lost & like a little spoiled brat :cursin: you cant accept it & you will try to justify it by spinning away.
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
3 Seconds said:
BS Spin now for your own wager. You cant change rules in the middle of bet. If you didnt think of this possibilty that's not Judge's fault.

I cant call up a book after a game starts & say oh wait they said Vince Young was going to play & now he isnt, so I am not going to allow you to keep the original wager. Here are my terms. You give me 17 additional pts or cancel the bet your choice. :mj07:

I think your line:

"But I am not going to allow scout to take away Gable being the #6 rated RB completely off their RB list."

Best sums you up. You wont allow Scout.
com :mj07: What an egocentric jack ass.

Now what if this happened in reverse & a S all of sudden became an RB. You wouldnt want to exclude him if he was a USC guy.

You are soon to become the WORM44 part II.

I can see a welching coming from a mile away.

You are going to lose, just like USC lost & like a little spoiled brat :cursin: you cant accept it & you will try to justify it by spinning away.

If I was going to welch on the bet, I would bring this up AFTER signing day to cover my a$$ and get out of it. Why would I bring it up before signing day?

I have a good argument. YOU CAN'T TAKE OFF A RB FROM THE RB LIST and change his position AFTER he commits to USC. That is bogus. Moving a RB up and down is fine. For example Moody went in Judge's favor which we agreed. But you can't take off a RB from the list. That is bull$hit.

I think JUDGE would agree. I will allow Judge to keep the BET or CANCEL the bet. It is his decision. I will honor his decision either way but GABLE must be rated top 10 RB in the country which he is.
 

thom24ad

UDFlyers
Forum Member
Sep 29, 2005
2,124
0
0
46
Columbus, OH
Scott even if he gives you Gable, i think you might still fall a little short...five RBs in one class in crowded backfield...don't you think that could influence some of those guys decisions...so far I only count two in the top 20 that have committed and Gable doesn't count in my book if he's not going to play RB
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
Sun Tzu said:
Scott you are in the wrong. Period.

Who cares what you say. You are always bitter so of course you would say I was wrong. Nothing but negative comments from you at this site 24/7.

This bet is between JUDGE and ME and IMO I bring up a valid argument. GABLE cannot be placed ON THE RB LIST to then OFF THE RB LIST. That is BOGUS! When we made our wager, I mentioned GABLE as one of the 3. Moody going from 10 to 12 is valid. Gable switching positions isn't.
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
thom24ad said:
Scott even if he gives you Gable, i think you might still fall a little short...five RBs in one class in crowded backfield...don't you think that could influence some of those guys decisions...so far I only count two in the top 20 that have committed and Gable doesn't count in my book if he's not going to play RB

It is up to JUDGE to give me GABLE or to call off the bet. If he gives me Gable and I still lose the bet, that is fine. I know for a fact Stafon is a verbal. Basically the bet is Spiller or anyone else coming to USC and Williams is supposed to be having second thoughts about coming to LSU. Moody easily could get back in the top 10. Its all up in the air. It is a fun bet but I will not lose it because Scout takes one of USC verbals and switches positions. That is bogus. Best part of all is I even mentioned Gable at RB when we made the bet. :) I just noticed this from the link you posted. Thanks for posting it. Hopefully Judge and I clear it up.
 
Last edited:

thom24ad

UDFlyers
Forum Member
Sep 29, 2005
2,124
0
0
46
Columbus, OH
Scott4USC said:
YOU CAN'T TAKE OFF A RB FROM THE RB LIST and change his position AFTER he commits to USC.
You can if he is not going play RB at SC, hell the kid could be top 10 other categories as well but he's not listed in those either...there a ton of kids that play other positions in what they were original thought of...for example AJ Hawk was originally recruited as a backup fullback for OSU but obviously that wasn't the case...But if I'm not mistaken you made it clear that you both would go by what scout.com says in there final rankings...If this was an argument over safeties then Gable would have been to your advantage but since it is not this should rule in Judge's favor...and bottom line you both agreed on what the final rankings were listed on scout.com
 

thom24ad

UDFlyers
Forum Member
Sep 29, 2005
2,124
0
0
46
Columbus, OH
Scott4USC said:
It is up to JUDGE to give me GABLE or to call off the bet. If he gives me Gable and I still lose the bet, that is fine. I know for a fact Stafon is a verbal. Basically the bet is Spiller or anyone else coming to USC and Williams is supposed to be having second thoughts about coming to LSU. Moody easily could get back in the top 10. Its all up in the air. It is a fun bet but I will not lose it because Scout takes one of USC verbals and switches positions. That is bogus. Best part of all is I even mentioned Gable at RB when we made the bet. :) I just noticed this from the link you posted. Thanks for posting it. Hopefully Judge and I clear it up.
I'm sure its not going to be that much of an issue...just wanted to give my two cents on it
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
thom24ad said:
You can if he is not going play RB at SC, hell the kid could be top 10 other categories as well but he's not listed in those either...there a ton of kids that play other positions in what they were original thought of...for example AJ Hawk was originally recruited as a backup fullback for OSU but obviously that wasn't the case...But if I'm not mistaken you made it clear that you both would go by what scout.com says in there final rankings...If this was an argument over safeties then Gable would have been to your advantage but since it is not this should rule in Judge's favor...and bottom line you both agreed on what the final rankings were listed on scout.com

I agreed to final rankings of scout and Moody going from #10 to #12 is valid. But I did not agree to taking a RB who was ON THE LIST and switching him to another position AFTER he commits to USC. That is bogus. USC already has 2 of the nations top safeties in the bag. Gable would be the 3rd. Gable will get shot at RB and DB. USC is not even looking at him as a safety. USC told him RB or DB. When we made the wager, Gable was listed as the #6 RB in the country. Why the hell would Scout suddenly take him off the list AFTER he verbals to USC? If he verballed to another school, he would stay at RB? That is bogus and I will not allow that. Moody going from #10 to #12 is ok. Gable situation I will not allow. I hope Judge agrees with me and sees my argument.
 

thom24ad

UDFlyers
Forum Member
Sep 29, 2005
2,124
0
0
46
Columbus, OH
good point and thank god this just a small bet...I guess its in the judges hands at this point...but I like the wager
 
Last edited:

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
thom24ad said:
good point and thank god this just a small bet...I guess its the judges hands at this point...but I like the wager

I am a very competitive person and I don't like losing. To me it is about winning or losing the wager. Paying up is not an issue. It was a fun and unique wager. A wager that IMO I had a 90% in winning (if Moody did not get dropped). I also felt USC had a 30% chance in landing 4 of the top 10 RB's. I would like to keep the wager but it is up to Judge. It will make Signing Day interesting. Judge needs to reply soon because Stafon Johnson is going to announce tom. (friday) Judge can't wait to decide AFTER Johnson gives his school of choice. If Johnson goes to UGA then I will lose the wager. If Johnson goes to USC, I am still in it. But I want Jude to decide before Johnson makes his verbal.
 

3 Seconds

Fcuk Frist
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2004
6,706
16
0
Marlton, NJ
I love how its up to Judge to allow it to be your way or nothing. You little spoiled brat. Sack up & honor your bet.

JOKE!!!
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
link to Spiller verbal. Spiller and his parents say it was untrue and that the writer mixed up the names with CJ GABLE. But Gable publicly verbaled last week.

link




***Now Judge has all the sources in front him to make this HAT BET official. :mj07: I hope Judge understands my argument and agrees with me. Will be interesting to see his take.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top