2-15 Big 12

Jayhawk_Thor

Rock Chalk
Forum Member
Dec 26, 2004
1,581
12
0
Lawrence, KS
11-2-1 last couple weeks.


Oklahoma -0 (@Col)
--- Interesting game to cap. Because I like to look at both sides, here are the reasons NOT to bet on Oklahoma: in Boulder the last 7 years, they are 2-2, with one of those wins coming by 1 point. They have been mediocre on the road this year, crapping the bed against KU in a loss, losing in Lincoln, and just barely escaping College Station, beating TAMU by a point. I am not as confident in this pick as I was when first looking at the card. However, the fact remains that OU is a far superior team. CU, while enjoying a unique home court advantage, has actually not been that great at home in Big 12 play, blowing out two bad teams in Nebraska and Baylor, but barely sneaking by mediocre KSU (by 4) and TT (by 2), as well as getting drilled by KU. I think OU toughs out a road victory here. Colorado has been overrated all year long, mostly based on their ability to manhandle talent-deprived teams (see: non-conferance) at home. Oklahoma is not talent deprived.

KSU +3.5 (@TT)
--- I'll be damned, Texas Tech is finally starting to show a pulse. Maybe Knight finally got the message through to them... it certainly took longer than it did to get it across to Dana Jacobsen. K. St. manages to keep games close in conferance, almost regardless of who or where they are playing. In their 10 Big 12 games this year, 8 of them have been decided by 4 or fewer points. With that track record, I have no idea how Tech can be favored by 3.5 points, especially because both teams have around the same talent (although I would give that to KSU). Texas Tech has been able to defend their home court well this year, but they have only beaten mediocre-poor teams. While KSU is mediocre, I see them hanging around in this one, possibly pulling it out at the end.

ISU -9 (Neb)
--- I keep giving ISU the benefit of the doubt, and they keep disapointing me. They have not been good in Ames this year, only 8-5, which is obliviously incredibly mediocre when compared to their past. I think that Nebraska is primed for a butt kicking though. Nebraska will be without Velander and McCray of course, and they are going to need some below average guards to defend Stinson and Blaylock, I don't see it happening. ISU can put up points, I don't think Nebraska can hang with them.


Good luck fellas.
 

Destructor D

Destructor
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2005
8,617
111
63
Kansas City, MO
It seems like everyone likes OU tonight, but it's tough to go against the Sooners based on their recent play. This trip to Boulder could be tough as the Buffaloes are 11-1 @ home. OU is 7-1 ATS their last 8 while Colorado is 0-4 ATS their last 4 and they were lucky to beat Texas Tech 66-64 over the weekend.

I think OU will be too physical for the Buffs and pull out the victory.

On your other game, I think it's tough to back Kansas State. The Wildcats are 1-6 on the road including consecutive road losses to Colorado, Baylor, and Misery. Texas Tech is 11-2 @ home and although the Red Raiders probably aren't as talented, they look okay in this spot vs. a Kansas State trying to find its identity without Coach Woolridge (recovering from back surgery).
 

tpaine07

<3gambling<3
Forum Member
Apr 13, 2005
1,511
5
0
IL
Im with you on OU here, just gotta decide how much to wager, most likely just a 1 unit play, looks real appetizing though.
 

Jayhawk_Thor

Rock Chalk
Forum Member
Dec 26, 2004
1,581
12
0
Lawrence, KS
DD...

One of the reasons I like OU is because Sampson is too smart to try and get into a track meet-type game with CU in that altitude. He will slow the game down into a plodding-half court game and let his big guys bang down low. I am thinking about adding a play on the total here in a little bit...

As for K St., I am definately not saying they are a great team, and no pick is ever a slam dunk. This season they have been hanging tight in almost every game, and if they keep that up, they will cover and/or win this one outright. I have my trepadations about the play, but I think that is how it will play out.

Good luck on your play Paine...
 

blgstocks

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2005
3,181
12
0
So. Cal
I like the OU play, im not on it, but i liked t. Im on the other side of the Texas Tech though. I dont see KState Hanging with TT especially at their home, and I think TT has alot more talent. But gl on the others
 

Jayhawk_Thor

Rock Chalk
Forum Member
Dec 26, 2004
1,581
12
0
Lawrence, KS
BLG, how can you say TT has a lot more talent?

Have you seen them this year? They only have a couple players that would ever see the court in a decent program.

K St. isn't good by any means, but Martin is a very good player, and they have transfers from other top programs that are good players as well....

Regardless of our differing opinion, it appears one of us will be happy later on tonight... =)
 

Jayhawk_Thor

Rock Chalk
Forum Member
Dec 26, 2004
1,581
12
0
Lawrence, KS
Well guys, I have to leave for evening classes, but I liked these plays well enough to post them:

OU/CU under 140
---- If the game plays out as I expect it to, it will go under. The danger with playing this and playing OU is that I think I will either go 2-0 or 0-2. I think if the game plays out as a low scoring affair, OU will win, and if they get into the track-meet shoot-em-up affair that I don't think Sampson will allow it to become, I think CU will escape. Regardless I think this is the right play.

Wisconsin -1.5 (OSU)
--- I don't post plays from other conferances, and with good reason. However, the Big 10 is the only other conferance I pay attention to at all, and I think major value is on this play. Big 10 teams at home are almost always cash-in-the-bank, and I am not convinced that OSU is any better than Wisky. Only having to lay 1.5 points here is very nice. I think Wisky pulls this one out at the end.

I'm off until later. GL guys.
 

blgstocks

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2005
3,181
12
0
So. Cal
Jayhawk, I have seen TT play 3 times this year, and to be honest none of it has been pretty, BUT I know last year they were pretty good and even though they lost their go to guy, Ronald Ross, there are a few talented guys returning. Jarius Jackson was a consistent scorer and Martin Zeno is good around basket and plays big. They are just young,

I geuss it would be between Talent/Potential. MAYBE KState has as much talent, no where NEAR the potential.

That makes sense though cause I can garuntee Bobby Knight can do a better recruiting job than Woolridge, who should spend his time on Monster looking for a new job.
Kstate does have Martin and Stewart(who are very talented), but top to bottom TT is more talented with a grip more potential. Best of luck though bud. Tough loss with Okla
 

Jayhawk_Thor

Rock Chalk
Forum Member
Dec 26, 2004
1,581
12
0
Lawrence, KS
BLG, I still think KSU is as talented, but man they got spanked tonight...

I had a tough, tough day. Especially OU... I missed big there, thought they had it sewn up at the break...

Yourcuz, I will shoot you an email.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top